Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 211–227 | Cite as

Social information processing and sociometric status: Sex, age, and situational effects

  • Esther Feldman
  • Kenneth A. Dodge
Article

Abstract

Theoretically based measures of social information-processing patterns in specific situations were developed and administered to popular, average, socially rejected, and socially neglected girls and boys in the first, third, and fifth grades (total n=95). Measures included interpretations of peers' intentions, quantity and quality of responses generated to problematic stimuli, evaluations of responses, and enactments of particular responses. Three kinds of situations were generated empirically as stimuli: being teased, being provoked ambiguously, and initiating entry into a peer group. Deviant children (rejected and neglected) were found to respond deficiently compared to average and popular children, but only in the situation in which they were teased. Older children performed more competently than younger children in all three situations. Interactions among gender, sociometric status, and age also were found. Findings were interpreted as evidence of the elusiveness and complexity of social information-processing defects among low sociometric status children.

Keywords

Young Child Information Processing Specific Situation Social Information Social Information Processing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1981). Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen.Society for Research in Child Development Monographs, 46(1).Google Scholar
  2. Asher, S. R., & Renshaw, P. D. (1981). Children without friends: Social knowledge and socialskill training. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (Eds.),The development of children's friendships (pp. 273–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children's loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 500–505.Google Scholar
  4. Berndt, T. J. (1983). Social cognition, social behavior, and children's friendships. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.),Social cognition and social development: A socioculturel perspective (pp. 158–192). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cantrell, V. L., & Prinz, R. J. (1984).Multiple perspectives of rejected, neglected, and accepted children: Relationship between sociometric status and behavioral characteristics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  6. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.Google Scholar
  7. Coie, J. D., & Kupersmidt, J. (1983). A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys' groups.Child Development, 54, 1400–1416.Google Scholar
  8. Coie, J. D., & Pennington, B. F. (1976). Children's perceptions of deviance and disorder.Child Development, 47, 407–413.Google Scholar
  9. Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. D. (1972). Longterm followup of early detected vulnerable children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 438–446.Google Scholar
  10. Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status.Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.Google Scholar
  11. Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.),Minnesota symposium in child psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 77–125). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Brakke, N. P. (1982). Behavior patterns of socially rejected and neglected preadolescents: The roles of social approach and aggression.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 389–409.Google Scholar
  13. Dodge, K. A., McClaskey, C. L., & Feldman, E. (1985). A situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 344–353.Google Scholar
  14. Dodge, K. A., Murphy, R. R., & Buchsbaum, K. (1984). The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: Implications for developmental psychopathology.Child Development, 55, 163–173.Google Scholar
  15. Dodge, K. A., Schlundt, D. G., Schocken, I., & Delugach, J. D. (1983). Social competence and children's sociometric status: The role of peer group entry strategies.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 309–336.Google Scholar
  16. Feldman, E. (1984).Assessment of social-cognitive skills in popular, average, rejected, and neglected girls and boys. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  17. Feshbach, N., & Feshbach, S. (1969). The relationship between empathy and aggression in two age groups.Developmental Psychology, 1, 102–107.Google Scholar
  18. Garber, J. (1984). Classification of childhood psychopathology: A developmental perspective.Child Development, 55, 30–48.Google Scholar
  19. Goldfried, M. R., & d'Zurilla, T. J. (1969). A behavior-analytic model for assessing competence. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.),Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 151–196). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kupersmidt, J. B. (1983).Predicting delinquency and academic problems from childhood peer status. Paper presented as part of a symposium, Strategies for Identifying Children at Social Risk: Longitudinal Correlates and Consequences, J. D. Coie, Chair, presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit.Google Scholar
  21. Ladd, G. W. (1983). Social networks of popular, average, and rejected children in school settings.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 337–345.Google Scholar
  22. Ladd, G. W., & Oden, S. L. (1979). The relationship between peer acceptance and children's ideas about helpfulness.Child Development, 50, 402–408.Google Scholar
  23. McFall, R. M. (1982). A review and reformulation of the concept of social skills.Behavioral Assessment, 4, 1–35.Google Scholar
  24. McGuire, J. (1973). Aggression and sociometric status with preschool children.Sociometry, 36, 542–549.Google Scholar
  25. Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status.Developmental Psychology, 19, 856–867.Google Scholar
  26. Parke, R., & Slaby, R. (1983). The development of aggression. In P. H. Musen (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. IV. Personality and socialization processes, E. M. Hetherington, Vol. ed. (pp. 547–643) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Putallaz, M., & Gottman, J. M. (1981). Social skills and group acceptance. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (Eds.),The development of friendship: Description and intervention (pp. 116–150). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rubin, K. H., & Krasnor, L. R. (1986). Social-cognitive and social behavioral perspectives on problem-solving. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.),Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 1–65). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Singleton, L. C., & Asher, S. R. (1977). Peer preferences and social interaction among third grade children in an integrated school district.Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 330–336.Google Scholar
  30. Spivack, G., Platt, J. J., & Shure, M. B. (1976).Social adjustment of young children: A cognitive approach to solving real life problems. Washington: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Sroufe, L. A., & Rutter, M. (1984). The domain of developmental psychopathology.Child Development, 55, 17–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esther Feldman
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Dodge
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Miami Medical SchoolMiami
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Human DevelopmentGeorge Peabody College, Vanderbilt UniversityNashville

Personalised recommendations