Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 455–471 | Cite as

Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood: Relations to peer status and social context dimensions

  • Joseph M. Price
  • Kenneth A. Dodge


Although there has been an accumulation of evidence to suggest a link between peer-directed aggression and social rejection, little attention has been given to the relations between specific subtypes of aggressive behavior and social rejection. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the relations between two subtypes of aggressive behavior (reactive and proactive aggression) and children's classroom peer status. The reciprocity of each of these subtypes of aggressive behavior and the social contexts in which these behaviors occur were also examined. Assessments of each of these forms of aggression among 70 boys (ages 5 and 6) were conducted using direct observations and teacher ratings. In general, directing reactive aggressive behavior toward peers was associated with social rejection, while utilization of instrumental aggression was positively related to peer status. The findings also indicated that directing proactive forms of aggression toward peers was related to being the target of proactive aggression. Finally, among older boys, both subtypes of aggression were more likely to occur during rough play than during any other type of play activity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asher, S. R., & Hymel, S. (1981). Children's social competence in peer relations; sociometric and behavioral assessment. In J. D. Wine & M. D. Smye (Eds.),Socio competence, (pp. 125–157). New York Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1973).Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, L. (1963).Aggression: A social psychological analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Burnstein, E., & Worchel, P. (1962). Arbitrariness of frustration and its consequences for aggression in a social situation.Journal of Personality, 30, 528–540.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and divergent validation of the multitrait-multimethod matrix:Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar
  6. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.Google Scholar
  7. Coie, J. d., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1983). A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys' groups.Child Development, 54, 1400–1416.Google Scholar
  8. Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social rejection and isolation.Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.Google Scholar
  9. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.Google Scholar
  10. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Brakke, N. P. (1982). Behavior patterns of socially rejected and neglected preadolescents: The roles of social approach and aggression.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 389–409.Google Scholar
  11. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. S., & Price, J. M. (1987).Peer status and aggression. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  12. Dodge, K. A., & Richard, B. A. (1985). Peer perceptions, aggression, and the development of peer relations. In J. B. Pryor & J. D. Day (Eds.)Social developmental perspectives of social cognition (pp. 35–38). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Dollard, J., Doob, C. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939).Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hartup, W. W. (1974). Aggression in childhood: Developmental perspectives.American Psychologist, 29, 336–341.Google Scholar
  15. Hartup, W. W., & deWit, J. (1974). The development of aggression: Problems and perspectives. In J. deWit & W. W. Hartup (Eds.),Determinants and origins of aggressive behavior (pp. 5–32). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  16. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1980). Sex differences in aggression: A rejoinder and reprise.Child Development, 51, 964–980.Google Scholar
  17. Mallick, S. K., & McCandless, B. R. (1966). A study of catharsis of aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 591–596.Google Scholar
  18. Parke, R. D., & Slaby, R. G. (1983). The development of aggression. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 547–642). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Rule, B. G., Dyck, R., & Nesdale, A. R. (1978). Arbitrariness of frustration: Inhibition or instigation effects on aggression.European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 237–244.Google Scholar
  20. Strayer, F. F. (1980). Social ecology of the preschool peer groups. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Development of cognitive affect and social relations.Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 165–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph M. Price
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Dodge
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Diego State UniversitySan Diego
  2. 2.Vanderbilt UniversityNashville

Personalised recommendations