The social behavior of peer-identified Aggressive, Withdrawn, and Aggressive/Withdrawn children
- 60 Downloads
- 20 Citations
Abstract
The behavioral patterns associated with peer ratings of aggression and withdrawal were explored. First, a discriminant function analysis (N=74) using seven observational variables was found to significantly identify groups of Aggressive, Withdrawn, and Contrast fourth-and fifth-grade girls and boys. Aggressive/Withdrawn children were not distinguishable from Contrasts. In subsequent analyses comparing the behaviors of children in the four groups at two schools (total N=117), children in the Aggressive and Withdrawn groups each showed distinctive patterns of social behavior, which were consistent across the two schools. The behavior of the Aggressive/Withdrawn children was not significantly different from that of Contrast children. However, results from one school suggested that Aggressive/Withdrawn children may receive a disproportionate amount of aggression from peers. Finally, the behavior patterns displayed by the deviant groups were similar for girls and boys, allowing for sex differences in base rates of playground behavior. These results confirm the observability of peer-identified patterns of aggression and withdrawal, and provide a detailed description of the behavior of such children in a free-play situation.
Keywords
Function Analysis Social Behavior Discriminant Function Base Rate Distinctive PatternPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1978). The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of empirical efforts.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1275–1301.Google Scholar
- Bower, E. M. (1969).Early identification of emotionally handicapped children in school (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
- Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. A. (1973). Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 438–446.Google Scholar
- Feltham, R. F., Doyle, A. B., Schwartzman, A. E., Serbin, L. A., & Ledingham, J. E., (1985). Friendship in normal and socially deviant children.Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 371–382.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, D. P. (1977). Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimated.Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 12, 103–116.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. M., & Bolstad, O. D. (1973). Methodological issues in naturalistic observation: Some problems and solutions for field research. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. C. Handy, & E. J. Mash (Eds.),Behavior change: Methodology, concepts, and practice (pp. 7–68). Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
- Kent, R. N., & Foster, S. L. (1977). Direct observational procedures: Methodological issues in naturalistic settings. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral assessment (pp. 279–328). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ledingham, J. E., & Schwartzman, A. E. (1984). A 3-year follow-up of aggressive and withdrawn behavior in childhood: Preliminary findings.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 157–168.Google Scholar
- Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment.Developmental Psychology, 21, 523–533.Google Scholar
- Michael, C. M., Morris, D. P., & Soroker, E. (1957). Follow-up studies of shy, withdrawn children II: Relative incidence of schizophrenia.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 27, 331–337.Google Scholar
- Milich, R., & Landau, S. (1984). A comparison of the social status and social behavior of aggressive and aggressive/withdrawn boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 277–288.Google Scholar
- Moskowitz, D., Schwartzman, A. E., & Ledingham, J. (1985). Stability and change in aggression and withdrawal in middle childhood and adolescence.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 30–41.Google Scholar
- Moskowitz, D. S., & Schwarz, J. C. (1982). Validity comparison of behavior counts and ratings by knowledgeable informants.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 518–528.Google Scholar
- Pekarik, E. G., Prinz, R. J., Liebert, D. E., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. M. (1976). The Pupil Evaluation Inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 83–97.Google Scholar
- Robins, L. N. (1979). Follow-up studies. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood (2nd ed., pp. 483–513). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schwartzman, A. E., Ledingham, J., & Serbin, L. A. (1985). Identification of children at risk for adult schizophrenia: A longitudinal study.International Review of Applied Psychology, 34, 363–380.Google Scholar
- Serbin, L. A., Lyons, J. A., Marchessault, K., Schwartzman, A. E., & Ledingham, J. E. (1987). Observational validation of a peer nomination technique for identifying aggressive, withdrawn, and aggressive/withdrawn children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 109–110.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983).Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Zax, M., Cowen, E. L., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. A. (1964). Identifying emotional disturbance in the school setting.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 34, 447–454.Google Scholar