Relation between the catalytic activity of binary compounds of group ii metals with nonmetals and the position of the elements in mendeleev's periodic system Communication 5. Regularities in the change of properties in the series of ZnO, ZnS, ZnSe, ZnTe
- 32 Downloads
Summary
- 1.
The existing empirical and theoretical works on the electronic theory of chemisorption and catalysis do not indicate what type of changes might occur in the catalytic properties of those semiconductors which do not possess d-electrons, if the metalloid anion is varied.
- 2.
The catalytic activity of a binary MeX compound with respect to alcohol dehydration was found to change side by side with the change in bond polarity, which change also shows up in several electrical properties. When the atomic weight of the metalloid in a MeX compound is increased, the alcohol-dehydration activation energy decreases, the dielectric constant increases, the width of the forbidden band and the electronegativity difference decreases. The dependence is complicated by changes in E with the degree of surface covering.
- 3.
On the basis of the literature data, we proposed that the catalytic action of ZnS, ZnSe, and ZnTe (possibly also ZnO) takes place in the range of predominantly intrinsic conduction. A final conclusion will only be reached after the measurements of electrical properties of semiconductors under catalytic conditions have been conducted. We assume that the position of extrinsic (impurity) conduction levels may also depend on the position of the elements constituting the semiconductor in the periodic table.
Keywords
Activation Energy Dielectric Constant Catalytic Activity Chemisorption ZnSePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- [1]O. V. Krylov, S. Z. Roginskii, and E. A. Fokina, Bull Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1957, 422.Google Scholar
- [2]O. V. Krylov, and E. A. Fokina, Bull Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1957, 266.Google Scholar
- [3]O. V. Krylov, M. Ya. Kushnerev, and E. A. Fokina, Bull Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1958, 1413.Google Scholar
- [4]B. V. Tronov and L. A. Pershina, J. Gen. Chem. 24, 1608 (1954).Google Scholar
- [5]R. E. Stephens, B. Kee, and D. Trivich, J. phys. Chem. 59, 966 (1955).Google Scholar
- [6]Y. Kaneko, Shokubai No. 10, 20 (1954).Google Scholar
- [7]A. M. Rubinshtein, S. G. Kulikov and B. A. Zakharov, Bull. Acad. Sci., USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1956, 587.Google Scholar
- [8]A. M. Rubinshtein, S. G. Kulikov, A. A. Dulov, and N. A. Pribytkova, Bull. Acad. Sci., USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1956, 596.Google Scholar
- [9]C. T. H. Stoddart and C. Kemball, J. Coll. Sci. 11, 532 (1956).Google Scholar
- [10]S. Z. Roginskii, Chem. Science and Industry 2, 138 (1957).Google Scholar
- [11]F. F. Vol'kenshtein, Coll. Heterogeneous Catalysis in Chemical Industry, Goskhimizdat, Moscow, 1955, p. 213. [In Russian].Google Scholar
- [12]F. F. Vol'kenshtein, Problems in Kinetics and Catalysis 8, 7A (1955).Google Scholar
- [13]A. I. Ioffe, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Div. 15, 477 (1951).Google Scholar
- [14]H. Welker, Z. Naturforsch. 7a, 744 (1952).Google Scholar
- [15]E. Mooser and W. B. Pearson, Phys. Rev. 101, 1608 (1956).Google Scholar
- [16]N. Mott and R. Gurney, Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals (Il, Moscow, 1950) [Russian translation] p. 15.Google Scholar
- [17]N. A. Goryunova, Problems in the Theory and Investigation of Semiconductors and of Semiconductor Metallurigical Processes, Izd. AN SSSR, Moscow, 1955, p. 29.Google Scholar
- [18]L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond (Goskhimizdat, Moscow, 1947) [Russian Translation], p. 71.Google Scholar
- [19]S. S. Shalyt, Electrical Conductance in Semiconductors, Leningrad House for the Dissemination of Science and Technology Press, Leningrad, 1956.Google Scholar
- [20]W. W. Piper and F. E. Williams, Phys. Rev. 84, 659 (1952).Google Scholar
- [21]S. E. Harrison, Phys. Rev. 93, 52 (1954)Google Scholar
- [22]D. G. Thomas and J. J. Landner, J. Chem. Phys. 25, 1136 (1956).Google Scholar
- [23]A. I. Ioffe, Semiconductors in Contemporary Physics, Izd. AN SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1954, p. 316.Google Scholar
- [24]Z. I. Kir'yashkina, F. M. Popov, D. I. Bilenko, and V. M. Kir'yashkin, J. Tech. Phys 27, 85 (1957).Google Scholar
- [25]G. M. Zhabrova, L. N. Kutseva, and S. Z. Roginskii, Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, 92, 569 (1953).Google Scholar
- [26]N. D. Sikolov, Problems in Kinetics and Catalysis, 8, 141 (1951).Google Scholar
- [27]H. Noller and R. Ostermeier, Z. Elektrochem. 60, 921 (1956).Google Scholar
- [28]E. A. Shilov, Coll. Problems in Kinetics, Catalysis and Reactivity, Izd. AN SSSR, Moscow, 1955, p. 749Google Scholar
- [29]O. V. Krylov and E. A. Fokina, Problemns in Kinetics and Catalysis, 9, 196 (1957).Google Scholar
- [30]E. Wyckoff, Crystal Structure, v. 3, Intersci. Publ., N. Y., 1948, p. 10, 11.Google Scholar
- [31]K. Hauffe, Advances in Catalysis, 7, 251 (1955).Google Scholar