Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 143–155 | Cite as

Hyperactive behavior in english schoolchildren: A questionnaire survey

  • Eric Taylor
  • Seija Sandberg
Article

Abstract

The differences in apparent prevalence of childhood hyperactivity between England and North America are more than 20-fold. This paper seeks to illuminate the reasons for the difference by applying a standard measure [Conners Teacher Rating Scale] to 437 English schoolchildren, aged 6 to 9 years, and comparing them with published surveys from the United States and Australasia. The rating scale had moderate interrater reliability and stability over time; it distinguished between children referred for psychiatric treatment and normal schoolchildren. Component analysis yielded a factor of hyperactivity-inattentiveness, distinct from conduct disorder. The mean hyperactivity scores of English children were higher than in most U.S. surveys but lower than in New Zealand. The national differences in rates of diagnosed hyperactivity are likely to reflect diagnostic inconsistency rather than true differences in children's behavior.

Keywords

Standard Measure Questionnaire Survey Interrater Reliability Teacher Rate Psychiatric Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abikoff, E., Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. Validation of a classroom observation code for hyperactive children. (1977).Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 722–783.Google Scholar
  2. Bosco, J. J., & Robin, S. S. (1980). Hyperkinesis: Prevalence and treatment (pp. 173–187). In C. K. Whalen & B. Henker (Eds.),Hyperactive children: The social ecology of identification and treatment. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cantwell, D. (1977). Hyperkinetic syndrome (pp. 524–555). In M. Rutter & L. Hersov (Eds.),Child psychiatry: Modern approaches, London: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
  4. Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 884–888.Google Scholar
  5. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special issue,Pharmacotherapy of Children) 24–29.Google Scholar
  6. Glow, R. A. (1981). Cross-validity and normative data on the Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales (pp. 107–15). In K. D. Gadow & J. Loney (Eds.),The psychosocial aspects of drug treatment for hyperactivity. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.Google Scholar
  8. Kupietz, S., Bailer, I. & Winsberg, B. (1972). A behavior rating scale for assessing improvement in behaviorally deviant children: A preliminary investigation.American Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 1432–1436.Google Scholar
  9. Lambert, N. M., Sandoval, J., & Sassone, D. (1978). Prevalence of hyperactivity in elementary school children as a function of social system definers.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 446–463.Google Scholar
  10. Rutter, M. L., Shaffer, D., & Sturge, C. (1976).A guide to a multiaxial classification scheme for psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. London: Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  11. Rutter, M. L., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970).Education, health and behavior: Psychological and medical study of childhood development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Safer, D. J. & Allen, R. P. (1976).Hyperactive children: Diagnosis and management. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sandberg, S., Rutter, M., & Taylor, E. (1978). Hyperkinetic disorder in psychiatric clinic attenders.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 20, 279–299.Google Scholar
  14. Sandberg, S., Weiselberg, M., & Shaffer, D. (1980). Hyperkinetic and conduct problem children in a primary school population: Some epidemiological considerations.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 21, 293–311.Google Scholar
  15. Sprague, R. L., Cohen, M. N., & Eichlseder, W. (1977, August).Are there hyperactive children in Europe and the South Pacific? Paper presented at meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, E. (1980). Brain damage: Evidence from measures of neurological function in children with psychiatric disorder (pp. 97–113). In E. F. Purcell (Ed.),Psychopathology of children and youth: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Werry, J. S. & Hawthorne, D. (1976). Conners' teacher questionnaire—Norms and validity.Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 257–262.Google Scholar
  18. Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, M. N. (1975). Conners' teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children—An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 3, 217–229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Taylor
    • 1
  • Seija Sandberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryInstitute of PsychiatryDenmark Hill, LondonEngland

Personalised recommendations