Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 389–409 | Cite as

Behavior patterns of socially rejected and neglected preadolescents: The roles of social approach and aggression

  • Kenneth A. Dodge
  • John D. Coie
  • N. Paul Brakke
Article

Abstract

Sociometric nominations were used to select groups of popular, average, rejected, and neglected third- and fifth-grade children. In two studies, the peer interactive behaviors of these children were naturalistically observed in their classrooms and on the playground. In contrast to popular children, rejected children displayed fewer task-appropriate behaviors and more task inappropriate and aggessive behaviors. Whereas rejected children prosocially approached peers as frequently as did popular children, peer responses to the approaches of rejected children were more likely to be negative. Neglected children, on the other hand, displayed relatively few task-inappropriate and aggressive behaviors, and socially approached peers infrequently. Their approaches also met with frequent rebuff by peers. The findings were discussed in terms of the behavioral bases of sociometric status. Suggestions were made for clinical researchers interested in behavioral change with rejected and neglected children.

Keywords

Aggressive Behavior Behavioral Change Behavior Pattern Interactive Behavior Clinical Researcher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, S., & Hymel, S. Children's social competence in peer relations: Sociometric and behavioral assessment. In J. Wine & M. Smye (Eds.),Social competence. New York: Guilford Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Asher, S. R., Oden, S. L., & Gottman, J. M. Children's friendships in school settings. In L. G. Katz (Ed.),Current topics in early childhood education (Vol. 1) Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Bakeman, R. Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analyses of observation data. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.),Observing behavior (Vol. 2) Baltimore: University Park press, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, J. D., & Yarrow, M. R. Perceptual and behavioral correlates of social effectiveness.Sociometry, 1961,24, 1–20.Google Scholar
  5. Charlesworth, R., & Hartup, W. W. Positive social reinforcement in the nursery school peer group.Child Development, 1967,38, 993–1002.Google Scholar
  6. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Developmental Psychology, 1982,18, 557–570.Google Scholar
  7. Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. A. Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,41, 438–446.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman, J. A., Corsini, D. A., & de Urioste, R. Implications of positive and negative sociometric status for assessing the social competence of young children.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1980,1, 209–220.Google Scholar
  9. Gottman, J. M. Toward a definition of social isolation in children.Child Development, 1977,48, 513–517.Google Scholar
  10. Gottman, J. M., Gonso, J., & Rasmussen, B. Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children.Child Development, 1975,46, 709–718.Google Scholar
  11. Gottman, J. M., Gonso, J., & Schuler, P. Teaching social skills to isolated children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976,4, 179–197.Google Scholar
  12. Hartup, W. W. Children and their friends. In H. McGurk (Ed.),Issues in childhood and development. London: Methuen, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. Hartup, W. W., Glazer, J. A., & Charlesworth, R. Peer reinforcement and sociometricstatus.Child Development, 1967,38, 1017–1024.Google Scholar
  14. Hymel, S., & Asher, S. R.Assessment and training of isolated children's social skills. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, 1977. (ERIC Document Service Reproduction Service No. ED146 930)Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, S. M., & Bolstad, O. D. Methodological issues in naturalistic observation: Some problems and solutions for field research. In L. A. Hamerlynck & E. J. Mash (Eds.),Behavior change: Methodology, concepts, and practice. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. Ladd, G. W. Effectiveness of a social learning method for enhancing children's social interaction and peer acceptance.Child Development, 1981,52, 171–178.Google Scholar
  17. Lahey, B. B., Green, K. D., & Forehand, R. On the independence of ratings of hyperactivity, conduct problems, and attention deficits in children: A multiple regression analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980,48, 566–574.Google Scholar
  18. Lippitt, R., & Gold, M. Classroom social structure as a mental health problem.Journal of Social Issues, 1959,15, 40–49.Google Scholar
  19. McGuire, J. M. Aggression and sociometric status with preschool children.Sociometry, 1973,36, 542–549.Google Scholar
  20. Moreno, J. L.Who shall survive? Washington, D.C.: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing, 1934.Google Scholar
  21. Oden, S., & Asher, S. R. Coaching children in social skills for friendship-making.Child Development, 1977,48, 495–506.Google Scholar
  22. Putallaz, M., & Gottman, J. M. Social skills and group acceptance. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (Eds.),The development of friendship: Description and intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. Richard, B. A., & Dodge, K. A. Social maladjustment and problem-solving among schoolaged children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982,50, 226–233.Google Scholar
  24. Robins, L. N.Deviant children grown up. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Roff, M., Sells, S. B., & Golden, M. M.Social adjustment and personality development in children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  26. Vandell, D. L., & George, C. B. Social interaction in hearing and deaf preschoolers: Successes and failures in initiations.Child Development, 1981,52, 627–635.Google Scholar
  27. Woody, R. H.Behavioral problem children in the schools: Recognition, diagnosis, and behavioral modification. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  28. Yarrow, M. R., & Waxler, C. Z. Observing interaction: A confrontation with methodology. In R. B. Cairns (Ed.),The analysis of social interactions. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Dodge
    • 2
  • John D. Coie
    • 1
  • N. Paul Brakke
    • 2
  1. 1.Duke UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations