Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 363–372

Agreement among teacher, peer, and self-ratings of children's aggression, withdrawal, and likability

  • Jane E. Ledingham
  • Alastair Younger
  • Alex Schwartzman
  • Guy Bergeron
Article

Abstract

This study examined the relationship among teacher, peer, and self-ratings of children's social behavior. The Pupil Evaluation Inventory was completed by 172 first-graders, 346 fourth-graders, 283 seventh-graders, and 30 teachers. Groups of deviant responders and controls were also selected from the total sample on the basis of peer-rated aggression and withdrawal scores. Interrater agreement was consistently greater between peer and teacher ratings than between self-ratings and either peer or teacher ratings. Discrepancies between raters were greatest for children with more deviant scores, with peer ratings providing the highest estimates of deviant behavior, and self ratings yielding the lowest. Self ratings were lower than teacher or peer ratings on aggression and withdrawal, and higher on likability. Aggression produced greatest agreement between raters. Agreement was uninfluenced by the cognitive maturity of peer evaluators. The results suggest that the selection of raters should be influenced by the class of behaviors to be evaluated and the context in which they occur.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, S., & Messick, S. Social competency in young children.Developmental Psychology, 1974,70, 282–293.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 183–200.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, D. J. Self perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Bower, E. M.Early identification of emotionally handicapped children in school. Spring-field, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. Connolly, J., & Doyle, A. B. Assessment of social competence in preschoolers. Teachers versus peers.Developmental Psychology, 1981,17, 454–462.Google Scholar
  6. Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. A. Long term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,41, 438–446.Google Scholar
  7. Foster, S. L., & Ritchey, W. L. Issues in the assessment of social competence in children.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1979,12, 625–638.Google Scholar
  8. Greenwood, C. R., Walker, H. M., & Hopps, H. Issues in social interaction/withdrawal assessment.Exceptional Children, 1977,43, 490–499.Google Scholar
  9. Hartup, W. W. Peer relations and the growth of social competence. In M. W. Kent & J. E. Rolf (Eds.),Primary prevention of psychopathology (Vol. 3). Hanover, New Hampshire: University Press of New England, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Kenrick, D. T., & Stringfeld, D. O. Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people.Psychological Review, 1980,87, 88–104.Google Scholar
  11. Kohn, M., & Rosman, B. L. A social competence scale and symptom checklist for the preschool child: Factor dimensions, their cross-instrument generality, and longitudinal persistence.Developmental Psychology, 1972,6, 445–452.Google Scholar
  12. Ledingham, J. E. Developmental patterns of aggressive and withdrawn behavior in childhood: A possible method for identifying preschizophrenics.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1981,9, 1–22.Google Scholar
  13. Mischel, W. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 252–283.Google Scholar
  14. Mischel, W.Introduction to personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Monson, T. C., & Snyder, M. Actors, observers and the attributional process: Toward a reconceptualization of personality.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977,13, 89–111.Google Scholar
  16. O'Leary, K. D. & Johnson, S. B. Psychological assessment. In H. C. Quay and J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  17. O'Malley, J. M. Research perspective on social competence.Merrill-Patmer Quarterly, 1977,23, 29–44.Google Scholar
  18. Pekarik, E. G., Prinz, R. J., Liebert, D. E., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. M. The pupil evaluation inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976,4, 83–97.Google Scholar
  19. Rolf, J. The academic and social competence of children vulnerable to schizophrenia and other behavior pathologies.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972,80, 225–243.Google Scholar
  20. Semler, I. J. Relationships among several measures of pupil adjustment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960,51, 61–64.Google Scholar
  21. Weintraub, S., Prinz, R. J., & Neale, J. M. Peer evaluations of the competence of children vulnerable to psychopathology.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1978,6, 461–473.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane E. Ledingham
    • 2
  • Alastair Younger
    • 1
  • Alex Schwartzman
    • 1
  • Guy Bergeron
    • 1
  1. 1.Concordia UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Child Study CentreUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations