The moon and the planets

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 3–49 | Cite as

Theory of the libration of the moon

  • Donald H. Eckhardt


In 1693, Jean Dominique Cassini disclosed his finding that the rotational motion of the Moon could be neatly described by the superposition of two uniform motions, a prograde rotation of the Moon about its polar axis and a retrograde precession of the Moon's equator along the ecliptic. The description of these motions is now called Cassini's laws. The theoretical explanation of Cassini's laws shows that physical librations with amplitudes less than 0″.5, as seen from the Earth, must also exist. Until 1970, the physical librations were just marginally discernible, and the dynamical theory was developed to a level far superior to the quality of the observations.

In 1970 the resolution of libration observations jumped by a factor of 104 over earlier techniques, and existing theories became inadequate for analyzing the observations. This paper presents a new semianalytic libration theory that is of use for analyzing observations. In this development the Moon is assumed to be either rigid, elastic or anelastic, and its gravity potential is represented through its fourth-degree harmonics. The Moon is considered to be moving about the Earth in an orbit that is perturbed by the Sun (the ALE of Deprit, Henrard and Rom), and by the planets and the figures of the Earth and Moon (from the ILE, principally derived by Brown). The direct effects of the rotation of the plane of the ecliptic and the figure of the Earth are also considered. Tables for physical libration variables are tabulated which are truncated at 0″.010.


Direct Effect Rotational Motion Gravity Potential Dynamical Theory Theoretical Explanation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Glossary of principal terms

A, B, C

lunar principal moments of inertia

a, a′

mean Earth-Moon and Earth-Sun distances


lunar latitude


lunar moment of inertia matrix


coefficients of spherical harmonic (n = degree,m = order) expansion of lunar gravity potential

e, e′

eccentricities of lunar and solar orbits


gravitational constant


mean inclination of lunar equator to ecliptic


inclination of lunar orbit to ecliptic


dynamical form-factor for Earth


potential disturbance Love number of Moon


lunar angular momentum

L (or*L), L′

mean longitudes of Moon and Sun

l, l′, F, D

Delaunay arguments

M, m, m′

masses of Moon, Earth and Sun


mean rate of lunar orbit

N2, N3, N4

second, third and fourth degree torques induced by Earth on Moon


second-degree torque induced by Sun on Moon


general precession rate


selenographic unit vector toward pole of ecliptic


p1 cosF−p2 sinF, p1 sinF+p2 cosF


mean radius of Moon


equatorial radius of Earth

r, r′

Earth-Moon and Earth-Sun distances


center equation and solar inequalities in lunar longitude


ephemeris time

u, u′

selenographic unit vectors toward Earth and Sun

Uijk,Uij, etc.

uiujuk,uiuj, etc.


longitude of Earth from descending node of Moon's equator


gravitational potential of the Moon and its second degree component


centrifugal and tidal potentials of the Moon

α, β, γ

(C−B)/A, (C−A)B and(B−A)/C

\(\bar \gamma \)

resonant value of γ for 2l−2F argument


inclination of lunar equator to ecliptic


correction factor for applying Kepler's third law to lunar orbit


\( - \dot \Omega /n\)


resonant angular rates for p and τ

Π, π

longitude of ecliptic rotation axis and rotation rate

ϱ, σ, τ

lunar physical librations in inclination, node and longitude

ϕ, ψ

Euler angles which, along with θ, define orientation of Moon


lunar rotation vector


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown, E. W.: 1910,Mem. Roy. Astron. Soc. 59, 1–103.Google Scholar
  2. Cappallo, R. J., King, R. W., Counselman III, C. C., and Shapiro, I. I.: 1981,Moon and the Planets 24, 109.Google Scholar
  3. Cassini, J. C.: 1721,Mémoires de l'Academie Royale des Sciences à Paris, 108–126.Google Scholar
  4. Cassini, J. D.: 1730,Mémoires de l'Academie Royale des Sciences à Paris 8, 1–50.Google Scholar
  5. Eckhardt, D. H.: 1970,The Moon 1, 264–275.Google Scholar
  6. Hayn, F.: 1902,Abhandlungen der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, math-phys. Kl. 27, 861–921.Google Scholar
  7. Henrard, J.: 1972, ‘Analytic Lunar Ephemeris: A Report’, Publication of the Dept. of Mathematics, University of Namur, Belgium.Google Scholar
  8. Jeffreys, H.: 1959,The Earth, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Jeffreys, H.: 1961,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron Soc. 122, 421–432.Google Scholar
  10. Kaula, W. M.: 1968,An Introduction to Planetary Physics, John Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Koziel, K.: 1948,Acta Astron. 4, 61–139.Google Scholar
  12. Lagrange, J. L.: 1780,Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Nouveaux Mémoires 11, 203–309.Google Scholar
  13. Mayer, T.: 1750,Kosmographische Nachrichten und Sammlungen auf das Jahr, 1748, Nürnberg, pp. 52–183.Google Scholar
  14. Migus, A.: 1980,Moon and the Planets 23, 391–427.Google Scholar
  15. Moons, M.: 1981, submitted toCeles. Mech. Google Scholar
  16. Seidelmann, P. K.: 1977,IAU Information Bull. 37, 37–40.Google Scholar
  17. Sommerfeld, A.: 1952,Mechanics, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Van Flandern, T. C.: 1976,Celes. Mech. 13, 511–514.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, J. G., Slade, M. A., Eckhardt, D. H., and Kaula, W. M.: 1973,The Moon 8, 469–483.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, J. G.: 1977, in J. D. Mulholland (ed.),Scientific Applications of Lunar Laser Ranging, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
  21. Yoder, C. F.: 1979, in P. Nacozy and S. Ferrez-Mello (eds.),Natural and Artificial Satellite Motion, University of Texas Press, pp. 211–221.Google Scholar
  22. ALE: See Henrard (1972).Google Scholar
  23. EXS: 1961,Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Ephemeris and the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac, London.Google Scholar
  24. ILE: Eckert, W. J., Jones, R., and Clark, H. K.: 1954, inImproved Lunar Ephemeris 1952–1959, Washington, pp. 283–363.Google Scholar
  25. LURE 2: See Williams (1977).Google Scholar
  26. Supplement to the AE 1968:The American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac, Washington, 1s–27s, 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald H. Eckhardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Air Force Geophysics LaboratoryHanscom Air Force BaseUSA

Personalised recommendations