Transition from kinetic to gasdynamic plasma retention in a plugotron
Article
First Online:
Received:
- 25 Downloads
Keywords
Planck Equation Homogeneous Magnetic Field Loss Cone Conservative Difference Scheme Nuclear Energy Production
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- 1.V. V. Mirnov and D. D. Ryutov, “A gasdynamic linear trap for plasma retention,” Pis'ma Zh. Tekh. Fiz.,5, No. 11 (1979).Google Scholar
- 2.V. V. Mirnov and D. D. Ryutov, “The gasdynamic trap,” Aspects of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Fusion Synthesis Series [in Russian], No. 1(5) (1980).Google Scholar
- 3.V. P. Nagornyi and V. V. Mirnov, The Kinetics of High-Energy Ions in a Gasdynamic Trap [in Russian], IYaF Preprint No. 82–155, Novosibirsk (1982).Google Scholar
- 4.A. H. Futch, J. P. Holdren, et al., “Multispecies Fokker-Planck calculations for D-T and D-He3 mirror reactors,” Plasma Phys.,14, 211 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.J. Killen, “Computer models of magnetically contained plasmas,” Nucl. Fus.,16, 841 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.R. S. Churaev and V. A. Chuyanov, “Calculating ion leaks from a trap with magnetic mirrors” [in Russian], IPM Akad. Nauk SSSR, Preprint No. 33, Moscow (1975).Google Scholar
- 7.I. F. Potapenko and V. A. Chuyanov, “The completeness of conservative difference schemes for a Landau equation system,” Zh. Vyshil. Mat. Mat. Fiz.,19, No. 2 (1979).Google Scholar
- 8.M. S. Pekker, A Completely Conservative Difference Scheme for the Two-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equation [in Russian], IYaF Preprint No. 80–38, Novosibirsk (1980).Google Scholar
- 9.A. V. Bobylev, I. F. Potapenko, and V. A. Chuyanov, “Conservation laws and completely conservative schemes for kinetic equations of Landau (Fokker-Planck) type,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,255, No. 6 (1980).Google Scholar
- 10.N. N. Yanenko, The Fractional-Step Method for Solving Multiparameter Problems in Mathematical Physics [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1967).Google Scholar
- 11.G. I. Budker, “Fusion reactions in a system with magnetic mirrors: direct conversion of nuclear energy to electricity,” in: Plasma Physics and the Controlled Fusion Reaction Problem [in Russian], Vol. 3, Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1958).Google Scholar
- 12.L. A. Artsimovich, Controlled Fusion Reactions [in Russian], Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1961).Google Scholar
- 13.V. I. Volosov and M. S. Pekker, “The accuracy of numerical calculations on plasma loss from open magnetic traps,” ChMMSS,10, No. 1 (1979).Google Scholar
- 14.G. É. Dagman and M. S. Pekker, Use of the PS-1000 Computer for Solving the Fokker-Planck Equation Describing Plasma Retention in Open Magnetic Traps [in Russian], IYaF Preprint No. 81–81, Novosibirsk (1981).Google Scholar
- 15.V. A. Trapeznikov, I. V. Pranchishvili, et al., “Geophysical computing suites based on the PS-2000 computer for use on expeditions,” Prib. Sist. Uprav., No. 2 (1981).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985