Causes of change in the kinetic equilibrium concentration of an intermediate product in the course of a chain reaction

  • E. T. Denisov
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Summary

  1. 1.

    The reasons for a change in the kinetic equilibrium concentration of an intermediate molecular product in a complex chain reaction were examined theoretically.

     
  2. 2.

    On the example of the reaction RH → I → F, all cases leading to a decrease in the kinetic equilibrium concentration of the intermediate product were analyzed.

     
  3. 3.

    The kinetic equilibrium concentration of an intermediate product may decrease for two reasons: due to a change in the composition of the radicals during the reaction and due to an increase in the rate of non-chain consumption of the intermediate product.

     

Keywords

Equilibrium Concentration Intermediate Product Complex Chain Molecular Product Kinetic Equilibrium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. [1]
    N. N. Semenov, Chain Reactions [in Russian] (State Chem. Press, Moscow, 1934).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. S. Enikolopyan, Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 30, 769 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    N. S. Enikolopyan, G. V. Korolev, and G. P. Savushkina, Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 31, 864 (1957).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    E. T. Denisov, Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 31, 1481 (1957).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. T. Denisov, Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 33, 1198 (1959).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. R. Sergienko and N. Ya. Chernyak, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 113, 351 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. T. Denisov and N. M. Émanuél, Uspekhi Khim. 27, 365 (1958).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. S. Kharasch, A. Fono, W. Nudenberg, and A. S. Poshkus, J. Organ. Chem. 15, 775 (1950).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. L. Friess, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71, 2571 (1949Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. S. Kharasch, A. Fono, and W. Nudenberg, J. Org. Chem. 15, 748 (1950).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. S. Kharasch and J. S. Burt, J. Org. Chem. 16, 150 (1951).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. E. Hay, N. M. Johnstone, C. F. Tipper, and R. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 629.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    C. F. Tipper, J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 1675.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. H. Seubold and W. E. Vaughan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 3790 (1953).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    E. J. Gasson, A. F. Millidge, and G. S. Primavesi, J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 2161.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    W. A. Waters and C. Wickham-Jones, J. Chem. Soc. 1951, 812.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. T. Denisov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Chemical Physics Academy of SciencesUSSR

Personalised recommendations