Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

How “open” is open learning?

  • 34 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Many of the models and paradigms that underlie open learning are based on inappropriate mechanistic, closed-system models-to name two, Instructional Systems Design (ISD) and behaviorism. This paper explores the roots of the open learning systems approach to education and examines the relationship between the goals of this approach and the models and methodologies that have followed its implementation. These models are then analyzed within the context of the theory of open and closed systems and a number of incongruities noted. An open systems orientation toward the development of learning systems is suggested and recommendations are made for its implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bateson, G. (1979).Mind and nature. New York: Dutton.

  2. Bateson, G. (1972) The logical categories of learning and communication. In:Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.

  3. Borich, G. D. (1979). A systems approach to the evaluation of training. In H.F. O'Neil (Ed.),Procedures for instructional systems development. New York: Academic Press.

  4. Coldeway, D. O. (1983, April).The basis of an instructional technology in higher education. Working paper from the Conference on Computer-Based Education and Instructional Design, Edmonton, Alberta.

  5. Commission on Non-Traditional Study. (1973).Diversity by design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  6. Dennett, D. C. (1981).Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  7. Faure, E. (1972).Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.

  8. Ferguson, M. (1980).The Aquarian conspiracy: Personal and social transformation in the 1980's. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher.

  9. Hall, A.D., & Fagen, R.E. (1956). Definition of system.General systems yearbook. (Vol. 1, pp. 18–28).

  10. Hayman, J. L. (1975). System theory and human organization. In: S. D. Zalatima & P. J. Sleeman (Eds.),A systems approach to learning environments. New Jersey: MEDED.

  11. Jantsch, E. (1980).The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. New York: Pergamon.

  12. le Gall, A.,et al. (1973).Present problems in the democratization of secondary and higher education. Paris: UNESCO.

  13. Manicas, P. T., & Paul, F. S. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science.American Psychologist, April, 399–413.

  14. MacKenzie, N., Postgate, R., & Scupham, J. (1975).Open learning: Systems and problems in post-secondary education. Paris: The UNESCO Press.

  15. Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moisey, S.D. How “open” is open learning?. Innov High Educ 9, 5–18 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00903362

Download citation

Keywords

  • Open System
  • Social Psychology
  • System Design
  • System Approach
  • Closed System