Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Gender and family therapy: Adding a bi-level belief systems component to assessment

Abstract

This article proposes that most couples requesting therapy describe gender socialized patterns as part of their relationship issues. Adding a component to assessment derived from principles of strategic and systemic family therapies and post-modernist feminist psychology which examines the couple's gendered belief system context is described. The belief system context is identified as the family's epistemology about gendering at the family belief system and sociocultural belief system level contexts. Three dimensions of the gendered belief system and a method for assessing the functionality of the belief system are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Braverman, L. (1986a). The depressed woman in context: A feminist family therapist's analysis. In M. Ault-Riche (Ed.),Women and family therapy. (pp. 90–101). Rockville, MD: Aspen.

  2. Braverman, L. (1986b). Beyond families: Strategic family therapy and the female client.Family Therapy, 13, 143–152.

  3. Chambeless, D., & Goldstein, A. (1980). Anxieties: Agoraphobia and hysteria. In A. Brodsky & R. Hare-Mustin (Eds.),Women and psychotherapy, (pp. 113–134). NY: Guilford.

  4. Goldner, V. (1988). Generation and gender: Normative and covert hierarchies.Family Process, 27, 17–32.

  5. Goldner, V. (1985). Feminism and family therapy.Family Process, 24, 31–47.

  6. Goodrich, T. J., Rampage, C., Ellman, B., & Halstead, C. (1988).Feminist family therapy. NY: W. W. Norton.

  7. Haley, J. (1976).Problem solving therapy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  8. Hare-Mustin, R. & Maracek, J. (Eds.) (1990).Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale.

  9. Hare-Mustin, R., & Maracek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism and psychology.American Psychologist, 43, 455–464.

  10. Hare-Mustin, R. (1987). The problem of gender in family therapy.Family Process, 26, 15–27.

  11. Hare-Mustin, R., & Maracek, J. (1986). Autonomy and gender: Some questions for therapists.Psychotherapy, 23, 205–212.

  12. Hare-Mustin, R. (1979). Family therapy and sex role stereotypes.The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 31–32.

  13. Hare-Mustin, R. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy.Family Process, 17, 181–194. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  14. James, K. (1984). Breaking the chains of gender.Journal of Family Therapy, 5, 241–248.

  15. James, K., & McIntyre, D. (1983). The reproduction of families: The social role of family therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 119–129.

  16. Lerner, H. (1983). Female dependency in context: Some theoretical and technical considerations.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 697–705.

  17. Libow, J. (1985). Gender and sex roles in family secrets.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 4, 32–41.

  18. Libow, J. A., Raskin, D. A., & Caust, B. L. (1982). Feminist and family systems therapy: Are they irreconcilable?American Journal of Family Therapy, 10, 3–12.

  19. Luepnitz, D. A. (1988).The family interpreted: Feminist theory in clinical practice. NY: Basic Books.

  20. MacKinnon, L. & Miller, D. (1987). The new epistomology and the Milan approach: Feminist sociopolitical considerations.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 139–155.

  21. Selvini-Palazzoli, M., Cecchin, G., Boscolo, L., & Prata, G. (1978).Paradox and counterparadox. NY: Jason Aronson.

  22. Tomm, K. (1984). One perspective on the Milan systemic approach. Part I: Overview of development, theory, and practice.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10, 113–125.

  23. Walters, M., Carter, B., Papp, P., & Silverstein, O. (1988).The invisible web: Gender patterns in family relationships. NY: Guilford.

  24. Watzlawick, P. (1984).The invented reality. NY: W. W. Norton.

  25. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974).Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. NY: Norton.

  26. Weissman, M. (1980). Depression. In A. Brodsky & R. Hare-Mustin (Eds.),Women and psychotherapy (pp. 97–112). NY: Guilford.

  27. White, M. (1989). The externalizing of the problem and re-authoring of lives and relationships. In M. White,Selected papers (pp. 5–28). Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwiche Centre Publications.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terry, L.L. Gender and family therapy: Adding a bi-level belief systems component to assessment. Contemp Fam Ther 14, 199–210 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00901504

Download citation

Keywords

  • Health Psychology
  • System Level
  • Social Issue
  • System Component
  • Family Therapy