Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 515–527 | Cite as

Family therapy and a “good” society: Fit or misfit?

  • Mary Lou Politi Ziter


Contextual therapy is compared with a “good” society based on socialist principles of equality, planning and sociality. The two models are analyzed across dimensions of justice, connectedness, change, and basic human resource for similarities and differences.


Human Resource Health Psychology Social Issue Family Therapy Socialist Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Attneave, C.L. (1976). Social networks as a unit of intervention. In P.J. Guerin, Jr. (Ed.),Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 220–232). New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R.M. (1984).The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R.W. (1966).Social justice. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bernal, G., & Ysern, E. (1986). Family therapy and ideology.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12(2), 129–134.Google Scholar
  5. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (1980). Trust-based therapy: A contextual approach.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 767–775.Google Scholar
  6. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (1985). Commentary: Transgenerational solidarity-therapy's mandate and ethic.Family Process, 24, 454–456.Google Scholar
  7. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (1986). Contextual therapy and the unity of therapies. In S. Sugarman (Ed.),The interface of individual and family therapy (pp. 65–72). Rockville, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  8. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (1987).Foundations of contextual therapy. New York: Brunner/ Mazel.Google Scholar
  9. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., Krasner, R. R. (1981). The contextual approach to psychotherapy: Premises and implications. In G. Berenson & H. White (Eds.).,Annual review of family therapy, Vol 1 (pp. 92–128). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (1973).Invisible family loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Ulrich, D. N. (1981). Contextual family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy (pp. 159–186). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. (1960).Socialism and Saint-Simon. A. W. Gouldner (Ed.). C. Sattler (Trans.). Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.Google Scholar
  13. Epstein, N. A., & Bishop, D. S. (1981). Problem-centered systems therapy of the family. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy (pp. 444–482). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, N.A., Bishop, D.S., & Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster model of family functioning.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
  15. Escoffier, J. (1986). Socialism as ethics.Socialist Review, 16(85), 117–121.Google Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen, G. (1983). After the welfare state.Public Welfare, 41(1), 28–34.Google Scholar
  17. Fisk, M. (1980).Ethics and society: A marxist interpretation of value. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R.L. Cohen (Ed.),Justice: Views from the social sciences (pp. 153–203). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Galper, J. H. (1975).Social work practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goldner, V. (1985). Feminism and family therapy.Family Process, 24, 31–47.Google Scholar
  22. Hare-Mustin, R.T. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy.Family Process, 17, 181–194.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, H.C. (1986). Emerging concerns in family therapy.Social Work, 31, 299–306.Google Scholar
  24. Lasch, C. (1979).Haven in a heartless world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Luepnitz, D.A. (1988).The family interpreted: Feminist theory in clinical practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. MacKinnon, L., & Miller, D. (1987). The new epistemology and the milan approach: Feminist and sociopolitical considerations.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 139–155.Google Scholar
  27. Parekh, B.C. (1975).The concept of socialism. New York: Holmes and Muir.Google Scholar
  28. Rhodes, M.L. (1985). Gilligan's theory of moral development as applied to social work.Social Work, 30, 101–105.Google Scholar
  29. Rueveni, U. (1979).Networking families in crisis. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sher, G.S. (Ed. and Trans.) (1978).Marxist humanism and praxis. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  31. Speck, R.V., & Attneave, C.L. (1973).Family networks. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  32. Tischner, J. (1984).The spirit of solidarity. M.B. Zaleski & B. Fiore (Trans.). San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  33. Van Heusden, A., & Van den Eerenbeemt, E. (1987).Balances in motion: Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy and his vision of individual and family therapy. New York: Brunner-Mazel.Google Scholar
  34. Vazquez, A.S. (1977). M. Gonzalez (Trans.).The philosophy of praxis. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wilde, O. (1969). The soul of man under socialism. In R. Ellmann (Ed.),The artist as critic (pp. 255–289). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, R. (1986). Towards many socialisms.Socialist Review, 16(85), 45–65.Google Scholar
  37. Ziter, M.L.P. (1987). Culturally sensitive treatment of black alcoholic families.Social Work, 32, 130–135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Lou Politi Ziter
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social WorkMoorhead State UniversityMoorhead
  2. 2.Department of Child Development and Family ScienceNorth Dakota State UniversityFargo

Personalised recommendations