Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Freedom and insanity

  • 22 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

The paper describes the refusal of the liberal community to assert the right of persons accused of mental illness to be free of coercive psychiatric intrusion. It suggests that the penchant for benevolent governmental intrusion into other social problems may be at fault and recommends that intervention be abandoned in favor of a return to human autonomy as a basis of the concept of freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Alexander, George and Szasz, Thomas, ‘From contract to status via psychiatry’,Santa Clara Lawyer 13 (1973), 537–559.

  2. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 US 254, 1970.

  3. Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45, 1905.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, G.J. Freedom and insanity. Metamedicine 3, 343–350 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900936

Download citation

Key words

  • Mental illness
  • Autonomy
  • Freedom
  • Incarceration
  • State
  • Law