Comments on “Geostatistics: Models and tools for the earth sciences” by A. G. Journel

Dubrule, O. and Kostov, C., 1986, An interpolation method taking into account inequality constraints: I. Methodology: Math. Geol., v. 18, n. 1, p. 33–51.Google Scholar

Journel, A. G., 1986, Geostatistics: Models and tools for the earth sciences: Math. Geol., v. 18, n. 1, p. 119–140.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1965, La théorie des variables régionalisées: Masson, Paris, 305 p.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1971, The theory of regionalized variables and their applications: Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Paris, 211 p.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1973, The intrinsic random functions and their applications: Adv. Appl. Prob., v. 5, p. 439–468.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1975a, A simple substitute for conditional expectation: The disjunctive kriging: Proceedings of NATO ASI on “Advanced Geostatistics in the Mining Industry,” p. 221–236.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1975b, Forecasting block grade distributions: The transfer functions: Proceedings of NATO ASI on “Advanced Geostatistics in the Mining Industry,” p. 237–251.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1978, Estimer et Choisir: Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Paris, 175 p.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1981, Splines and kriging: Their formal equivalence,in D. F. Merriam (Ed.) Down-to-earth statistics: Solutions looking for geological problems: Syracuse Univ. Geol. Contrib., p. 77–95.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1984a, Isofactorial models and change of support,in G. Verly, M. David, A. G. Journel, and A. Maréchal (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd NATO ASI on “Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization, (Part 1): D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands, p. 449–467.Google Scholar

Matheron, G., 1984b, Une méthodologie générale pour les modèles isofactoriels discrets,in “Etudes Géostatistiques” Séminaire CFSG-CESMAT, Fontainebleau: Sciences de la Terre, n. 21, p. 1–64.Google Scholar

Philip, G. M. and Watson, D. F., 1986, Matheronian geostatistics—Quo vadis?: Math. Geol., v. 18, n. 1, p. 93–117.Google Scholar