Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving

  • 62 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

Abstract

Computer-based complex information systems are used increasingly more often, for a growing variety of purposes, in both educational and professional contexts. Since the effectiveness of information systems will largely depend on the particular purpose and the particular task context at hand, at least part of our research efforts should be directed at studying specific application areas. This paper reports a study on the use of hypertext information systems during architectural-design problem solving. Theoretical notions on design problem solving, such as distinguishing between a problem-structuring and a problem-solving phase, provide us with expectations about the changing informational needs during the design process. Specific information structures are proposed, incorporating design principles from learning research, to accommodate these informational needs. Results of an empirical study indeed showed interactions between design phase and information structure when separately inspecting the outcomes for problem structuring and problem solving. Educational implications include the use of a combination of hierarchical decomposition and cross-referencing for certain instructional goals, such as teaching complexity and abstraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akin, ö. (1986).Psychology of Architectural Design. London: Pion.

  2. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6: 87–129.

  3. Case. D. (1990). Using hypertext to create design programming databases.Journal of Interior Design Education and Research 16: 37–52.

  4. Cohen, U., Hill, A.B., Lane, C.G., McGinty, T. and Moore, G.T. (1979). Recommendations for child play areas (Report R79-1). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Architecture and Urban Planning.

  5. De Vries, E. (1994). Structuring information for design problem solving. Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

  6. De Vries, E. and De Jong, T. (1997). Using information systems while performing complex tasks: An example from architectural design.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46: 31–54.

  7. Duffy, T.M. and Jonassen, D.H. (1991, May). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology?Educational Technology, pp. 7–12.

  8. Edwards, D.M. and Hardman, L. (1989). Lost in hyperspace: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment. In R. McAleese, ed.,Hypertext: Theory into Practice, pp. 105–125. Oxford: Intellect Limited.

  9. Eylon, B.S. and Reif, F. (1984). Effects of knowledge organization on task performance.Cognition and Instruction 1: 5–44.

  10. Fischer, G., McCall, R. and Morch, A. (1989). JANUS: Integrating hypertext with a knowledgebased design environment. InProceedings of Hypertext '89, pp. 105–118. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, New York: ACM.

  11. Girill, T.R. and Luk, C.H. (1992). Hierarchical search support for hypertext on-line documentation.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36: 571–585.

  12. Goel, V. and Pirolli, P. (1989, Spring). Motivating the notion of generic design within information processing theory: the design problem space.AI Magazine, pp. 18–36.

  13. Goel, V. and Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces.Cognitive Science 16: 395–429.

  14. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts.Human-Computer Interaction 5: 305–344.

  15. Hamel, R. (1990). Over het denken van de architect: Een cognitief psychologische beschrijving van het ontwerpproces bij architecten (On designing by architects: A cognitive psychological description of the architectural design process). Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  16. Jacobson, M.J. and Spiro, R.J. (1992). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  17. Jonassen, D.H. and Grabinger, R.S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D.H. Jonassen and H. Mandl, eds,Designing Hypermedia for Learning, pp. 3–25. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

  18. Jones, J.C. (1980).Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures (2nd edn). New York: Wiley.

  19. Lawson, B. (1990).How Designers Think (2nd edn). London: The Architectural Press.

  20. McKnight, C., Dillon, A. and Richardson, J. (1990). A comparison of linear and hypertext formats in information retrieval. In R. McAleese and C. Green, eds,Hypertext: State of the Art, pp. 10–19. Oxford: Intellect Limited.

  21. Mohageg, M.F. (1992). The influence of hypertext linking structures on the efficiency of information retrieval.Human Factors 34: 351–367.

  22. Pieters, J.M. (1992). Het ongekende talent: over het ontwerpen van artefacten in de instructietechnologie (The unknown talent: on the design of artefacts in instruction technology). Inaugural lecture, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

  23. Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An empirical investigation of expert practice.Performance Improvement Quarterly 5: 65–86.

  24. Simon, H.A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems.Artificial Intelligence 4: 181–201.

  25. Simon, H.A. (1981).The Sciences of the Artificial (2nd edn). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  26. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J. and Coulson, R.L. (1991, May). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology, pp. 24–33.

  27. Spiro, R.J. and Jehng, J-.C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix and R.J. Spiro, eds,Cognition, Education and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology, pp. 163–205. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  28. Spiro, R.J., Vispoel W.P., Schmitz, J.G., Samarapungavan, A. and Boerger, A.E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application. In B.K. Britton and S.M. Glynn, eds,Executive Control Processes in Reading, pp. 177–199. London: Erlbaum.

  29. Van Bakel, A.P.M (1995). Styles of architectural designing: Empirical research on working styles and personality dispositions. Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

  30. Visser, W. (1990). More or less following a plan during design: Opportunistic deviations in specification.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33: 247–278.

  31. Voss, J.F. and Post, T.A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser and M.J. Farr, eds,The Nature of Expertise, pp. 261–285. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  32. Wright, P. and Lickorish, A. (1990). An empirical comparison of two navigation systems for two hypertexts. In R. McAleese and C. Green, eds,Hypertext: State of the Art, pp. 84–93. Oxford: Intellect Limited.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vries, E., De Jong, T. The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving. Instr Sci 27, 285–302 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897323

Download citation

Key words

  • architectural design
  • hypertext
  • problem-solving