Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 164–170 | Cite as

Single locus heterosis

  • György P. Rédei
Article
  • 209 Downloads

Summary

Experimental evidence is reported in favor of superdominance in over-all vigor inArabidopsis thaliana in connection with two x-ray induced mutants. The tests adopted (outcrossing to unrelated tester, repeated recombination for 15 generations) failed to reveal any additional genetic variation. The genetic and physiolgical mechanism of superdominance is discussed in light of recent information on gene structure and function.

Keywords

Genetic Variation Recombination Experimental Evidence Gene Structure Single Locus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Allison, A. C.: Protection afforded by sickle-cell trait against subtertian malarial infection. Brit. med. J.1, 290–294 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Case, G. E., andN. H. Giles: Comparative complementation and genetic maps of the pan-2 locus inNeurospora crassa. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)46, 659–676 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Connell, G. E., andO. Smithies: Human haptoglobins: estimation and purification. Biochem. J.72, 115–121 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demerec, M., andP. E. Hartman: Complex loci in microorganisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.13, 377–406 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dierks, W.: Untersuchungen zum Heterosisproblem. Z. Pflanzenzücht.40, 67–102 (1958).Google Scholar
  6. Emerson, R. A.: The genetic relations of plant colors in maize. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoir 39, 1921.Google Scholar
  7. Freese, E.: On the molecular explanation of spontaneous and induced mutations. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. No12, p. 63–75, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Freudenthal, H.: Ein kombinatorisches Problem von biochemischer Herkunft. Proc. kon. ned. Akad. Wet., Ser. A61, 253–258 (1958).Google Scholar
  9. Golomb, S. W., L. R. Welch andM. Delbrück: Constitution and properties of comma free codes. Biol. Medd. Vid. Selsk.23, No 9, 1–34 (1958).Google Scholar
  10. Gowen, J. W. (editor): Heterosis. Iowa State College Press 1952.Google Scholar
  11. Grafius, J. E.: heterosis in barley. Agronomy J.51, 551–554 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hiorth, G.: Eine Serie multipler Allele für Blütenzeichnungen beiGodetia amoena. Hereditas (Lund)26, 441–453 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingram, V. M.: Abnormal human haemoglobins I. The comparison of normal human and sickle-cell haemoglobins by “fingerprinting”. Biochem. biophys. Acta28, 539–545 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, D. F.: Gene action in heterosis. Genetics42, 93–103 (1957).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.: Gene interaction, environment and hybrid vigour. Proc. roy. Soc. B144, 178–185 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maling, B. D., andC. Yanofsky: The properties of altered proteins from mutants bearing one or two lesions in the same gene. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)47, 551–566 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muller, H. J.: Our load of mutations. Amer. J. hum. Genet.2, 111–176 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. —, andR. Falk: Are induced mutations inDrosophila overdominant? I. Experimental design. Genetics46, 727–735 (1961).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Murray, N. E.: Complementation and recombination between methionine alleles inNeurospora crassa. Heredity15, 207–217 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pätau, K.: Zur statistischen Beurteilung von Messungsreihen (Eine neuet-Tafel). Biol. Zbl.63, 152–168 (1943).Google Scholar
  21. Pauling, L., H. A. Itano, S. J. Singer andI. C. Wells: Sickle-cell anemia, a molecular disease. Science110, 543–548 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pontecorvo, G.: Gene structure and action in relation to heterosis. Proc. roy. Soc. B144, 171–177 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rendel, J. M.: Heterosis. Amer. Naturalist87, 129–138 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Röbbelen, G.: Untersuchungen an strahleninduzierten Blattfarbenmutanten vonArabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. Vererb.-Lehre88, 189–252 (1957).Google Scholar
  25. Schuler, J. F.: Natural mutations in inbred lines of maize and their heterotic effect. I. Comparison of parent, mutant and their F1 hybrid in a highly inbred background. Genetics39, 908–922 (1954).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. —, andG. F. Sprague: Natural mutations in inbred lines of maize and their heterotic effect. II. Comparison of mother line versus mutant when outcrossed to unrelated inbreds. Genetics41, 281–291 (1956).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Stadler, L. J.: Spontaneous mutation at theR locus in maize. I. The aleuron-color and plant color effects. Genetics31, 377–394 (1946).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Whaley, W. G.: Physiology of gene action in hybrids. Pp. 98–113 inJ. W. Gowen, edit., Heterosis 1952.Google Scholar
  29. Woodward D. O.: A gene concept based on genetic and chemical studies inNeurospora. Quart. Rev. Biol.35, 313–323 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wricke, G.: Ein Fall von Superdominanz bei einer experimentell hergestellten Autotetraploiden vonArabidopsis thaliana. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. Vererb.-Lehre87, 47–64 (1955).Google Scholar
  31. Yanofsky, C., andP. St. Lawrence: Gene action. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.14, 311–340 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • György P. Rédei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Field CropsUniversity of MissouriColumbia

Personalised recommendations