Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 171–190 | Cite as

Some asymptotic properties of kriging when the covariance function is misspecified

  • Michael L. Stein
  • Mark S. Handcock
Articles

Abstract

The impact of using an incorrect covariance function on kriging predictors is investigated. Results of Stein (1988) show that the impact on the kriging predictor from not using the correct covariance function is asymptotically negligible as the number of observations increases if the covariance function used is “compatible” with the actual covariance function on the region of interestR. The definition and some properties of compatibility of covariance functions are given. The compatibility of generalized covariances also is defined. Compatibility supports the intuitively sensible concept that usually only the behavior near the origin of the covariance function is critical for purposes of kriging. However, the commonly used spherical covariance function is an exception: observations at a distance near the range of a spherical covariance function can have a nonnegligible effect on kriging predictors for three-dimensional processes. Finally, a comparison is made with the perturbation approach of Diamond and Armstrong (1984) and some observations of Warnes (1986) are clarified.

Key words

prediction intrinsic random fields compatibility robustness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, M. and Myers, D., 1984, Robustness of Kriging; Variogram Modelling and its Applications: Technical Report, Centre de Geostatistique, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  2. Delfiner, P., 1976, Linear Estimation of Non-Stationary Spatial Phenomena: p. 49–68in M. Gurascio, M. David, and C. Huijbregts (Eds.), Advanced Geostatistics in the Mining Industry: Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Diamond, P. and Armstrong, M., 1984, Robustness of Variograms and Conditioning of Kriging Matrices: Math. Geol., v. 16, p. 809–822.Google Scholar
  4. Doob, J. L., 1953, Stochastic Processes: John Wiley, New York, 654 p.Google Scholar
  5. Goldberger, A., 1962, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in the Generalized Linear Regression Model: J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., v. 57, p. 369–375.Google Scholar
  6. Hajek, J., 1958, On a Property of Normal Distributions of an Arbitrary Stochastic Process: Czech. Math. J., v. 8, p. 610–618.Google Scholar
  7. Ibragimov, I. A. and Rozanov, Y. A., 1978, Gaussian Random Processes: (trans. Aries, A. B.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 275 p.Google Scholar
  8. Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining Geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p.Google Scholar
  9. Kitanidis, P. K., 1983, Statistical Estimation of Polynornial Generalized Covariance Functions and Hydrologic Applications: Water Resour. Res., v. 19, p. 909–921.Google Scholar
  10. Krasnitskii, S. M., 1973, On Conditions of Equivalence and Perpendicularity of Measures Corresponding to Homogeneous Gaussian Fields: Theory Probab. Its Appl., v. 18, p. 588–592.Google Scholar
  11. Matheron, G., 1973, The Intrinsic Random Functions and their Applications: Adv. Appl. Probab., v. 5, p. 437–468.Google Scholar
  12. Rendu, J-M., 1978, An Introduction to Geostatistical Methods of Mineral Evaluation: Monogr. S. Afr. Inst. Mining Metall., 100 p.Google Scholar
  13. Ripley, B. D., 1981, Spatial Statistics: John Wiley, New York, 252 p.Google Scholar
  14. Rozanov, Y. A., 1968, Infinite Dimensional Gaussian Distributions: Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, Amer. Math. Soc. v. 108, p. 1–136.Google Scholar
  15. Skorokhod, A. V. and Yadrenko, M. I., 1973, On Absolute Continuity of Measures Corresponding to Homogeneous Gaussian Fields: Theory Probab. Its Appl., v. 8, p. 27–40.Google Scholar
  16. Stein, M., 1988, Asymptotically Efficient Spatial Interpolation with a Misspecified Covariance Function: Ann. Stat., v. 16, p. 55–63.Google Scholar
  17. Sukhatme, S., 1985, Kriging with Perturbed Variogram: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association Annual Meetings, p. 296–299.Google Scholar
  18. Warnes, J. J., 1986, A Sensitivity Analysis for Universal Kriging: Math. Geol., v. 18, p. 653–676.Google Scholar
  19. Yaglom, A. M., 1962, An Introduction to the Theory of Stationary Random Functions: Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 235 p.Google Scholar
  20. Yakowitz, S. J. and Szidarovszky, F., 1985, A Comparison of Kriging with Nonparametric Regression Methods: J. Multivariate Anal. v. 16, p. 21–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Stein
    • 1
  • Mark S. Handcock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations