Soviet Physics Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 1758–1762 | Cite as

The physical interpretation of the parameters in the generalized Kerr—Nut solution. I

  • V. P. Semenov
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The interpretation of the parameters in the generalized Kerr-NUT solution is considered by investigating the dynamical characteristics of the field corresponding to a given solution. It is shown that the interpretation obtained of these parameters differs in some aspects from the one generally accepted, It is assumed that the reason for this is the unfortunate choice of the frame of reference utilized in obtaining the dynamical characteristics of the field.

Keywords

Dynamical Characteristic Physical Interpretation Unfortunate Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    M. Demianski and E. T. Newman, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci.,14, 653 (1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Letters,11, 237 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, J. Math. Phys.,6, 918 (1965).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. T. Newman, G. Tamburino, and T. Unti, J. Math. Phys.,4, 915 (1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. T. Newman, J. Math. Phys.,14, 774 (1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. T. Newman and R. Penrose, J. Math. Phys.,3, 566 (1962).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Demianski, Phys. Letters,42A, 157 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. J. Jauis and E. T. Newman J. Math. Phys.,6, 902 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Trautman, in: I. E. Tamm and G. I. Haan (editors), Einstein Collection 1967 [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1967).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Denen, in: I. E. Tamm and G. I. Haan (editors), Einstein Collection 1969–1970 [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. M. Dozmorov, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fiz., No. 11, 47 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. P. Semenov, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fiz., No. 1 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Komar, Phys. Rev.,113, 934 (1959).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Synge, Relativity: The General Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1960).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ya. B. Zel'dovich and I. D. Novikov, Theory of Gravitation and the Evolution of Stars [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1971).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshits, Field Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Winicour and G. Tamburino, Phys. Rev. Lett.,15, 601 (1965).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. M. Dozmorov and V. P. Semenov, The Latest Problems in Gravitation, Abstracts of Papers Given at the All-Union Symposium [in Russian], Moscow (1973), p. 82.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. M. Cohen, J. Math. Phys.,9, 905 (1968).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. K. Moss and W. R. Davis, Nuovo Cimento,11, 84 (1972).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. M. Dozmorov, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fiz., No. 8; 40 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Semenov
    • 1
  1. 1.All-Union Scientific-Research Institute of Optical Physical MeasurementsUSSR

Personalised recommendations