Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 775–787 | Cite as

Statistical control chart for regime identification in volcanic time series

  • Chih-Hsiang Ho
Articles

Abstract

In an important paper, Mulargia et al. (1987) address the importance of quantitative and objective identification of different regimes of a volcano. They develop a procedure based on the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) statistic. The K-S test is a general-purpose test that discriminates between two data sets as belonging to two different regimes based on their empirical distribution functions. The empirical distribution function is designed to describe the aggregate behavior of the volcanic activity, and it is constructed from the orders of the length of the collected repose times in each data set. In this article, we use the idea of statistical process control to distinguish between the variation inherent in the observed repose times and the extraordinary variation that signals a real change in the regimes. We construct a table of control limits, and we demonstrate the procedure of regime identification based on a simple control chart. It shows a point outside the control limits almost as soon as the process enters a new regime. The basis of the statistical process control mechanism is a simple Poisson process, which is state of the art. The proposed control charting procedure is an eruption by eruption procedure, which follows the original chronological order of the eruptions. This procedure is applied to the eruptive history of the Mount Etna volcano. The application shows schematically that the procedure presents a visual interpretation of the identified regimes and can be practically translated for tabular or manual use.

Key words

exponential distribution process control Weibull Poisson process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ascher, H., 1983, Discussion on Statistical Methods in Reliability, by J. F. Lawless: Technometrics, v. 25, p. 305–335.Google Scholar
  2. Bain, L. J., and Engelhardt, M., 1980, Inferences on the Parameters and Current System Reliability for a Time Truncated Weibull Process: Technometrics, v. 22, p. 421–426.Google Scholar
  3. Bain, L. J., and Engelhardt, M., 1991, Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life-Testing Models—Theory and Methods, 2nd ed.: Marcel Dekker, New York, 496 p.Google Scholar
  4. Bain, L. J., and Engelhardt, M, and Wright, F. T., 1985, Tests for an Increasing Trend in the Intensity of a Poisson Process: A Power Study: J. Am. Stat. Assoc. v. 80, p. 419–422.Google Scholar
  5. Bassin, W. M., 1969, Increasing Hazard Functions and Overhaul Policy: Proceedings of the 1969 Annual Symposium on Reliability, IEEE, Chicago, p. 173–178.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, D. A., and Lindgren, B. W., 1990, Statistics: Theory and Methods: Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 763 p.Google Scholar
  7. Crow, L. H., 1974, Reliability Analysis for Complex Repairable Systems, in F. Proschan and R. J. Serfling (eds.), Reliability Systems, Reliability and Biometry: SIAM, Philadelphia, p. 379–410.Google Scholar
  8. Crow, L. H., 1982, Confidence Interval Procedures for the Weibull Process with Applications to Reliability Growth: Technometrics, v. 24, p. 67–72.Google Scholar
  9. Finkelstein, J., 1976, Confidence Bounds on the Parameters of the Weibull Process: Technometrics, v. 18, p. 115–117.Google Scholar
  10. Ho, C.-H., 1990, Bayesian Analysis of Volcanic Eruptions: J. Volcano. Geotherm. Res., v. 43, p. 91–98.Google Scholar
  11. Ho, C.-H., 1991a, Nonhomogeneous Poisson Model for Volcanic Eruptions: Math. Geol., v. 23, p. 167–173.Google Scholar
  12. Ho, C.-H., 1991b, Time Trend Analysis of Basaltic Volcanism for the Yucca Mountain Site: J. Volcano. Geotherm. Res. v. 46, p. 61–72.Google Scholar
  13. Klein, F. W., 1982, Patterns of Historical Eruptions at Hawaii Volcanoes: J. Volcano. Geotherm. Res. v. 12, p. 1–35.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, F. W., 1984, Eruption Forecasting at Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii: J. Geophys. Res., v. 89, p. 3059–3073.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, L., and Lee, S. K., 1978, Some Results on Inferences for the Weilbull Process: Technometrics, v. 20, p. 41–45.Google Scholar
  16. Montgomery, D. C., 1985, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control: John Wiley, New York, 520 p.Google Scholar
  17. Mulargia, F., Tinti, S., and Boschi, E., 1985, A Statistical Analysis of Flank Eruptions on Etna Volcano: J. Volcano. Geotherm. Res., v. 23, p. 263–272.Google Scholar
  18. Mulargia, F., Gasperini, P., and Tinti, S., 1987, Identifying Different Regimes in Eruptive Activity: An Application to Etna Volcano: J. Volcano. Geotherm. Res. v. 34, p. 89–106.Google Scholar
  19. Ryan, T. P., 1989, Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement: John Wiley, New York, 446 p.Google Scholar
  20. Shaban, S. A., 1980, Change-Point Problem and Two-Phase Regression: An Annotated Bibliography: Int. Stat. Rev., v. 48, p. 83–93.Google Scholar
  21. Wickman, F. E., 1966, Repose-Period Patterns of Volcanoes: Ark. Mineral. Geol., v. 4, p. 291–367.Google Scholar
  22. Wickman, F. E., 1976, Markov Models of Repose-Period Patterns of Volcanoes, in D. F. Merriam (Ed.), Random Processes in Geology: Springer, New York, p. 135–161.Google Scholar
  23. Wolfe, D. A., and Schechtman, E., 1984, Nonparametric Statistical Procedures for the Change-Point Problem: J. Stat. Plan. Infer., v. 9, p. 389–396.Google Scholar
  24. Zacks, S., 1983, Survey of Classical and Bayesian Approaches to the Change-Point Problem: Fixed Sample and Sequential Procedures of Testing and Estimation, in M. H. Rizvi, (Ed.), Recent Advances in Statistics: Academic Press, New York, p. 245–269.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Hsiang Ho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasLas Vegas

Personalised recommendations