Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre

, Volume 90, Issue 3, pp 385–392 | Cite as

Multivalent frequency and seed fertility in raw and evolved tetraploids of Brassica campestris var. toria

  • M. S. Swaminathan
  • K. Sulbha
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The types of chromosome associations found during diakinesis and metaphase I of meiosis in microsporocytes was studied in plants belonging to the C1, C2, C17, C18 and C19 generations of induced tetraploids of strain 22 ofBrassica campestris var.toria. It was found that there was a considerable decrease in the frequency of multivalents and increase in the frequency of bivalents in tetraploid plants belonging to the later generations in comparison with those belonging to the earlier generations.

     
  2. 2.

    The mean number of seeds per siliqua in the C1 and C2 tetraploids was 1.5 and 3.0 respectively, while this number increased to 14.5, 14.9 and 16.8 in C17, C18 and C19 generations respectively. The increase in seed fertility had been brought about by adopting the mass pedigree system of selection.

     
  3. 3.

    From the observation that coincident with an increase in seed fertility there is a tendency towards a decrease in multivalent frequency in autotetraploidToria, it is suggested that the relationship between these two processes may not be wholly casual.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Armstrong, J. M., andR. W. Robertson: Studies of colchicine induced tetraploids ofTrifolium hybridum L. I. Cross and self fertility and cytological observations. Canad. J. agric. Sci.36, 255–266 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. Bremer, G., andD. E. Bremer-Reinders: Breeding of tetraploid rye in the Netherlands. I. Methods and cytological investigations. Euphytica3, 49–63 (1954).Google Scholar
  3. Darlington, C. D.: Recent advances in cytology, 2. edit Philadelphia: Blakiston 671 pp. 1937.Google Scholar
  4. Gilles, A., andL. F. Randolph: Reduction of quadrivalent frequency in autotetraploid maize during a period of 10 years. Amer. J. Bot.38, 12–17 (1951).Google Scholar
  5. Hagberg, A.: Frekvensen av plantor med avvikande kromosomtal i marknadspartior av tetraploid råg (Dubbelstålråg). Kungl. Lantbruksakad. Tidskr.92, 417–427 (1953).Google Scholar
  6. Harland, S. C.: Methods and results of selection experiments with Peruvian Tanguis cotton. Part I. A survey of present methods of cotton breeding and a description of the “Mass Pedigree System”. Part II. The “Mass Pedigree System” in practice. Emp. Cotton Gr. Rev.26, 163–174, 247–255 (1949).Google Scholar
  7. Hilpert, G.: Effect of selection for meiotic behaviour in auto-tetraploid rye. Hereditas (Lund)43, 318–322 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. Howard, H. W.: The cytology of autotetraploid Kale,Brassica oleracea. Cytologia (Tokyo)10, 77 bis 87 (1939).Google Scholar
  9. Müntzing, A.: Cytogenetic properties and practical value of tetraploid rye. Hereditas (Lund)37, 18–84 (1951).Google Scholar
  10. —: Chromosomes in relation to species differentiation and plant breeding. Conference on chromosomes, W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink, Zwelle the Netherlands. Lecture6, 1–37 (1956).Google Scholar
  11. Müntzing, A., andR. Prakken: The mode of chromosome pairing inPhleum twins with 63 chromosomes and its cytogenetic consequences. Hereditas (Lund)26, 463–501 (1940).Google Scholar
  12. Parthasarathy, N., andS. S. Rajan: Studies in the fertility of autotetraploids ofBrassica campestris var.toria. Euphytica2, 25–37 (1953).Google Scholar
  13. Rajan, S. S.: The effectiveness of the mass pedigree system of selection in the improvement of seed setting in autotetraploids ofToria. Indian J. Genet.15, 47–49 (1955).Google Scholar
  14. Ramanujam, S., andM. J. Deshmukh: Colchicine induced polyploidy in crop plants. III. Oleiferous Brassicae. Indian J. Genet.5, 63–81 (1945).Google Scholar
  15. Riley, R., andV. Chapman: Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature (Lond.)182, 713–715 (1958).Google Scholar
  16. Sears, E. R., andM. Okomoto: Proc. 10. Int. Congr. Genet.2, 258–259 (1958).Google Scholar
  17. Stebbins, G. L.: Artificial polyploidy as a tool in plant breeding. Brookhaven, Symp. Biol.9, 37–52 (1956).Google Scholar
  18. Swaminathan, M. S., M. L. Magoon andK. L. Mehra: A simple propionocarmine PMC smear method for plants with small chromosomes. Indian J. Genet.14, 87–88 (1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Swaminathan
    • 1
  • K. Sulbha
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations