Human Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 157–197 | Cite as

Macronutrient modifications of optimal foraging theory: An approach using indifference curves applied to some modern foragers

  • Kim Hill
Article

Abstract

The use of energy (calories) as the currency to be maximized per unit time in Optimal Foraging Models is considered in light of data on several foraging groups. Observations on the Ache, Cuiva, and Yora foragers suggest men do notattempt to maximize energetic return rates, but instead often concentrate on acquiring meat resources which provide lower energetic returns. The possibility that this preference is due to the macronutrient composition of hunted and gathered foods is explored. Indifference curves are introduced as a means of modeling the tradeoff between two desirable commodities, meat (protein-lipid) and carbohydrate, and a specific indifference curve is derived using observed choices in five foraging situatiuons. This curve is used to predict the amount o meat that Mbuti foragers will trade for carbohydrate, in an attempt to test the utility of the approach.

Key words

nutrients foraging theory hunter-gatherers South America 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, S., and Wagner, S. (1978). A general model of optimal diet. In Chivers, D. J., and Herbert, J. (eds.),Recent Advances in Primatology (Vol. 1). Academic Press, London, pp. 407–414.Google Scholar
  2. Beckerman, S. (1983). Carpe diem: An optimal foraging approach to Bari fishing and hunting. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.),Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonias. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Belovsky, G. E. (1978). Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore, the moose.Theoretical Population Biology 14: 105–134.Google Scholar
  4. Belovsky, G. E. (1984). Herbivore optimal foraging: A comparative test of three models.American Naturalist 124: 97–115.Google Scholar
  5. Belovsky, G. E. (1987). Hunter-gatherer foraging: A linear programing approach.Journal of Anthropology and Archeology 6: 29–76.Google Scholar
  6. Blundell, J. E. (1983). Problems and processes underlying the control of food selection and nutrient intake. In Wurtman, R. J., and Wurtman, J. J. (eds.),Nutrition and the Brain (Vol. 6). New York, Raven Press, pp. 163–221.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. (1985).Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Burkhardt, S., Mercer, L. P. Schweisthal, M., and Cole, T. (1982). Kinetics of specific food intake and weight gain in rats.American Journal of Phisiology 243: 531–536.Google Scholar
  9. Castonguay, T., Hartman, W., Fitzpatrick, E., and Stern, J. (1982). Dietary self-selection and the Zucker Rat.Journal of Nutrition 112: 796–800.Google Scholar
  10. Chagnon, N., and Hames, R. (1979). Protein deficiency and tribal warfare in Amazonia: New data.Science 20: 910–913.Google Scholar
  11. Charnov, E. L. (1973). Optimal Foraging: Some Theoretical Expectations. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  12. Charnov, E. L., and Orians, G. H. (1973). Optimal Foraging: Some Theoretical Explorations. Masters thesis, Department of Biology, University of Utah.Google Scholar
  13. Covich, A. (1972). Ecological economics of seed consumption by peromyscus: A graphical model of resource substitution.Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of the Arts and Sciences 44: 71–93.Google Scholar
  14. Donald, P., Pitts, G., and Pohl, S. (1980). Body weight and composition in laboratory rats: Effects of diets with high or low protein concentration.Science 211: 185–186.Google Scholar
  15. Durnin, J. V. G. A., Edholm, O. G., Miller, D. S., and Waterlow, J. C. (1973). How much food does man require?Nature 242: 418.Google Scholar
  16. Emlen, J. M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preference.American Naturalist 100: 611–617.Google Scholar
  17. Evvard, J. (1915).Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 22: 375–403.Google Scholar
  18. Fomon, S., Thomas, L., Filer, L., Zediler, E., and Leonard, M. (1971). Food consumption and growth of normal infants fed milk-based formulas.Acta paediatr. Scan. (suppl.) 223: 1.Google Scholar
  19. Gross, D. (1982). Proteina y cultura en al Amazonia: Una segunda revision.Amazonia Peruana 3: 85–97.Google Scholar
  20. Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (1982). Optimal diet breadth theory as a model to explain variability in Amazonian hunting.American Ethnologist 9: 258–278.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, J. (1978). From subsistence to market: A case study of the Mbuti net hunters.Human Ecology 6: 325–353.Google Scholar
  22. Hawkes, K. (1987). Fitness and foraging effort. In Harris, M., and Ross, E. (eds.),Food Preferences and Aversions. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  23. Hawkes, K., and O'Connell, J. (1985). Optimal foraging models and the case of the Kung.American Anthropologist 87(2): 401–405.Google Scholar
  24. Hawkes, K., Hill, K., O'Connell, J. (1982). Why hunters gather: Optimal foraging and the Ache of Eastern Paraguay.American Ethnologist 9: 379–398.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkes, K., O'Connell, J., Hill, K., and Charnov, E. (1985). How much is enough? Hunters and limited needs.Ethology and Sociobiology 6: 3–15.Google Scholar
  26. Hickson, J., Wolinsky, I., Pivarnik, J., Neuman, E., Itak, J., and Stockton, J. (1987). Nutritional profile of football athletes eating from a training table.Nutrition Research 7: 27–34.Google Scholar
  27. Hill, K., and Hawkes, K. (1983). Neotropical hunting among the Ache of eastern paraguay. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.),Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians.Google Scholar
  28. Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (1988). Population Description and Dry Season Subsistence Strategies among the Newly Contacted Yora (Yaminahua) of Manu National Park, Peru. In press National Geographic Research 5(3).Google Scholar
  29. Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (1987). Tradeoffs in male and female reproductive strategies among the Ache: Part 2. In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff-Mulder, M., and Turke, P. (eds.)Human Reproductive Effort. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  30. Hill, K., Hawkes, K., Hurtado, A. M., and Kaplan, H. (1984). Seasonal variance in the diet of Ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay.Human Ecology 12: 145–180.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, K., Kaplan, H., Hawkes, K., and Hurtado, A. M. (1987). Foraging decisions among Ache hunter-gatherers: New data and implications for optimal foraging models.Ethology and Sociobiology 8: 1–36.Google Scholar
  32. Hurtado, A. M. (1985). Womens Subsistence Strategies among Ache Hunter-Gatherers of Eastern Paraguay. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah.Google Scholar
  33. Hurtado, A. M., and Hill, K. (1986). The Cuiva: Hunter-gatherers of Western Venezuela.Anthroquest 36.Google Scholar
  34. Hurtado, A. M., and Hill, K. (1987). Early dry season subsistence ecology of Cuiva foragers of Venezuela.Human Ecology 15(2).Google Scholar
  35. Hurtado, A. M., Hawkes, K., and Hill, K. (1985). Female subssitence strategies among the Ache of eastern Paraguay.Human Ecology 13: 1–28.Google Scholar
  36. Jerome, N., Pelto, G., and Kandel, R. (1980). An ecological approach to nutritional anthropology. In Jerome, N., Kandel, R., and Pelto, G. (eds.),Nutritional Anthropology. Redgrave, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, H. (1983). The Evolution of Food Sharing among Adult Conspecifics: Research with the Ache Foragers of Paraguay. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah.Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan, H., and Hill, K., (1985a). Food sharing among Ache foragers: Tests of explanatory hypothesis.Current Anthropology 26(2): 223–246.Google Scholar
  39. Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. (1985b). Hunting ability and reproductive success among male Ache foragers: Preliminary results.Current Anthropology 26(1): 131–133.Google Scholar
  40. Keene, A. (1981). Optimal foraging in a non-marginal environment: A model of prehistoric subsistence strategies in Michigan. In Winterhaider, B., and Smith, E. A. (eds.),HunterGatherer Foraging Strategies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Leshner, A., Collier, G., and Squibb, R. (1971).Physiology and Behavior 6: 1–3.Google Scholar
  42. Leung, W. T. (1961).Food Composition Table for use in Latin America, NIH, Bethesda, Md.Google Scholar
  43. MacArthur, R. H., and Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment.American Naturalist 100: 603–609.Google Scholar
  44. Martorell, R., Land Habicht, J.-P. (1986). Growth in early childhood in developing countries. In Falkner, F., and Tanner, J. (eds.),Human Growth: A Comprehensive Treatise (Vol. 3). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Maynard Smith, J. (1978). Optimization theory in evolution.Am. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 31–56.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, D., and Mumford, P. (1967). An experimental study of overeating low or high protein diets.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 20: 1212–1222.Google Scholar
  47. Milton, K. (1979). Factors influencing leaf choice by Howler Monkeys. A test of some hypotheses of food selection by generalist herbivores.American Naturalist 114: 362–378.Google Scholar
  48. Montgomery, E., and Johnson, A. (1977). Machiguenga energy expenditure.Ecology of Food and Nutrition 6: 97–105.Google Scholar
  49. O'Connell, J., and Hawkes, K. (1981). Alywara plan use and optimal foraging theory. In Winterhalder, B., and Smith, E. A. (eds.),Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  50. Pulliam, H. R. (1975). Diet optimization with nutrient constraints.American Naturalist 109: 765–768.Google Scholar
  51. Pyke, G., Pullaim, H. R., and Charnov, E. (1977). Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and test.Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 137–154.Google Scholar
  52. Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J., and Green, L. (1981). Maximization theory in behavioral psychology.Behavioral Brain Science 4: 371–417.Google Scholar
  53. Rapport, D. J. (1971). An optimization model of food selection.American Naturalist 105: 575–587.Google Scholar
  54. Rapport, D. J. (1980). Optimal foraging for complementary resources.American Naturalist 116: 324–346.Google Scholar
  55. Reidhead, V. A. (1979). Linear programming models in archeology.Annual Review of Anthropology. 79: 543–578.Google Scholar
  56. Sanjur, D., and Romero, E. (1972). Conceptual levels of dietary indicators as predictors of nutritional status.Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Nutrition, 2: 214–222.Google Scholar
  57. Sih, A., and Milton, K. (1985). Optimal diet theory: Should the !Kung eat mongongos.American Anthropologist 87(2): 395–400.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, E. A. (1980). Evolutionary Ecology and the Analysis of Human Foraging Behavior. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, E. A. (1981). The application of optimal foraging theory to the analysis of hunter-gatherer group size. In Winterhaider, B., and Smith, E. A. (eds.),Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, E. A. (1983). Anthropological applications of optimal foraging theory: A critical review.Current Anthropology 24: 625–651.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, E. A. (1985). Inuit foraging groups: Some simple models incorporating conflicts of interest, relatedness, and central place sharing.Ethology and Sociobiology 6: 37–57.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, E. A. (1987). Risk and uncertainty in the “original afluent society”: Evolutionary ecology of resource sharing and land tenure. In Woodburn, J., Ingold, T., and Riches, D. (eds.),History, Evolution, and Social Change in Hunting and Gathering Societies. Berg Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  63. Stephens, D., and Krebs, J. (1987).Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  64. Tilman, D. (1982).Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  65. Willet, J. (1973). Food needs and the effective demand for food. In Poleman and Freebank (eds.),Food, Population and Employment: The Impact of the Green Revolution. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Winterhaider, B. E. (1977). Foraging Strategies and Adaptations of the Boreal Forest Cree: An Evaluation of Theory and Models from Evolutionary Ecology. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell, University.Google Scholar
  67. Winterhaider, B. E. (1981). Foraging strategies in the Boreal environment: An analyses of Cree hunting and gathering. In Winterhaider, B., and Smith, E. A. (eds.),Hunger-Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Acheological Analyses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  68. Winterhaider, B. (1983). Opportunity-cost foraging models for stationary and mobile predators.American Naturalist 122: 73–84.Google Scholar
  69. Winterhaider, B. E. (1987). Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment.Journal of Anthropological Archeology 5: 369–392.Google Scholar
  70. Winterhaider B., and Smith, E. A. (1981).Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Acheological Analyses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  71. Yoshimura, Y., Kighi, K., Matsumot, Y., and Inoue, S. (1982). Quantitative effects of nitrogen and energy intakes on body weight and nitrogen retention in adult rats.Tokushima Journal of Exp. Medicine 29: 163–172.Google Scholar
  72. Zefas, A., Jellife, D., and Jellife, E. F. P. (1986). Epidemiology and nutrition. In Falkner, F., and Tanner, J. (eds.),Human Growth: A Comprehensive Treatise (Vol. 3). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyEmory UniversityAtlanta

Personalised recommendations