Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Medicine as a science of action a response to Peter Hucklenbroich

  • 20 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. [1]

    Hucklenbroich, P.: 1981, ‘Action theory as a source for philosophy of medicine’,Metamedicine 2, 55–73.

  2. [2]

    Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D. C.: 1981, ‘Response to our commentators’,Metamedicine 2, 43–51.

  3. [3]

    Sadegh-zadeh, K.: 1981, ‘Normative systems and medical metaethics. Part 1: Value kinematics, health, and disease’,Metamedicine 2, 75–119.

  4. [4]

    Thomasma, D. C., and Pellegrino, E. D.: 1981, ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’,Metamedicine 2, 5–11.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellegrino, E.D., Thomasma, D.C. Medicine as a science of action a response to Peter Hucklenbroich. Metamedicine 2, 235–243 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00884425

Download citation