Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 555–566 | Cite as

Demographic & related differences in ethical views among small businesses

  • Paul J. Serwinek
Article

Abstract

This study examines the effects of demographic characteristics on ethical perceptions. While earlier research has produced conflicting results regarding the predictive power of these variables, significant and definite insights were obtained with proper controls. The following predictors of ethical attitudes are examined: age, gender, marital status, education, dependent children status, region of the country and years in business, while controlling for job status. A nation-wide random sample of employees was used in obtaining a response rate of fifty-three percent (total n of 423). Indices of aspects of business ethical attitudes were constructed using factor analysis. Linear multiple regression analysis indicated the significant predictive variables. Age was found to be a most-significant predictor. Older workers had stricter interpretations of ethical standards. Gender and region predicted attitudes about job-discrimination practices only, with women and persons from the Midwest most strongly opposed to the practice. All the other variables proved to be unreliable ethics predictors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akaah, I.: 1989, ‘Difference in Research Ethics Judgments Between Male and Female Majority Professionals’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 375–81.Google Scholar
  2. Arlow, P. and Ulrich, T.: 1980, ‘Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empirical Comparison of Clark's Study’,Akron Business and Economic Review 11(3), pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
  3. Babbie, E.: 1986,The Practice of Social Research, 4th ed. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Beltramini, R., Peterson, R., and Kozmetsky, G.: 1984, ‘Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 3, pp. 195–200.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, R.: 1976, ‘Morally Speaking, Who Are Today's Teachers?’,Phi Beta Kappan 57, pp. 624–25.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, D. P.: 1981, ‘Improving Ethical Awareness Through the Business and Society Course’,Business and Society 20(2), pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
  7. Brenner, O.: 1988, ‘Relations of Age and Education to Managers' Work Values’,Psychology Report 64, pp. 639–42.Google Scholar
  8. Brenner, S. and Molander, E.: 1977, ‘Is the Ethics of Business Changing?’,Harvard Business Review 55, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
  9. Burnett and Karson: 1987, ‘Personal Values and Business Decisions’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 371–82.Google Scholar
  10. Cain, G.: 1966,Married Women in the Labor Force, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrell, O. and Skinner S.: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organization’,Journal of Marketing Research 25, pp. 103–9.Google Scholar
  12. Hegarty, H. and Sims, H.: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’,Journal of Applied Psychology 63, pp. 451–7.Google Scholar
  13. Kahn, A., Nelson, and Gaeddert: 1972, ‘Reactions to Generosity or Stinginess from an Intelligent or Stupid Work Partner’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21, pp. 116–23.Google Scholar
  14. Kidwell, J., Stevens, R. and Bechke, A.: 1987, ‘Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers, Myth or Reality’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 451–7.Google Scholar
  15. Lerner, M.: 1980,The Belief in a Just World, New York, Plenum.Google Scholar
  16. Major, B. and Deaux, K.: 1980,Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mudrack, P.: 1989, ‘Age-Related Differences in Machiavellianism in Adult Sample’,Psychology Report, Part 2,64, pp. 1947–50.Google Scholar
  18. Munhall, P.: 1980, ‘Moral Reasoning Levels of Nursing Students’,Image 12(3), pp. 57–61.Google Scholar
  19. Ondrack, D. A.: 1973, ‘Emerging Occupational Values: A Review and Some Findings’,Academy of Management Journal 16, pp. 423–32.Google Scholar
  20. Posner, B. Z. and Schmidt, W.: 1984, ‘Values and the American Manager: An Update’,California Management Review 26(3), pp.202–16.Google Scholar
  21. Purcell, T.: 1977, ‘Do Courses in Business Ethics Pay Off?’,California Management Review 19, pp. 50–58.Google Scholar
  22. Rest, J. R.: 1979, ‘The Impact of Education on Moral Judgment Development’,Technical Report −5, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rest, J. R. and Thoma, S.: 1985, ‘Relation of Moral Judgment Development to Formal Education’,Developmental Psychology 21(4), pp. 709–14.Google Scholar
  24. Troy, L. and Sheflin, N.: 1985, Union Sourcebook 1st ed., Industrial Relations Data & Information Service, West Orange, New Jersey, pp. 1–4, 7–8.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Bureau of Labor: 1990, Chicago, Illinois Regional Office Bulletin.Google Scholar
  26. VenKatesh, A.: 1988, ‘Changing Roles of Women: A Life-Style Analysis’,Journal of Consumer Research 7, pp. 189–97.Google Scholar
  27. Vitell and Ferstervand: 1987, ‘Business Ethics: Conflicts, Practices and Beliefs of Industrial Executives’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 111–22.Google Scholar
  28. Wald, P.: Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Will We Ever Rid the Legal Profession of “the Ugly Residue of Gender Discrimination?”, Human Rights, Spring, 1989, 16: 40–3.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, J., Longenecker, J., McKinney, J. and Moore, C.: 1988, ‘Ethical Attitudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 249–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. Serwinek
    • 1
  1. 1.Wayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations