Geotechnical & Geological Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 53–62 | Cite as

Pressurized grout applications in fractured tuff for containment of radioactive wastes

  • D. R. Crouthamel
  • J. J. K. Daemen
Papers
  • 44 Downloads

Summary

Currently under study by the Department of Energy are the geologic and hydrologic characteristics of the ash-flow deposits under Yucca mountain at the Nevada test site. Of interest at this site is the potential for disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in the unsaturated zone of the densely welded portions of the tuffs. These studies include the preformance-assessment of barriers and seals for boreholes, ramps, drifts and shafts at the Yucca mountain site. In-situ tests on standard Type II Portland cement and microfine cement as grout materials have been performed on a similar rock type to Yucca Mountain's near Superior Arizona. The tests were performed in a vertical borehole drilled in highly fractured and densely welded tuff (brown unit of Apache Leap) through a series of pressurized grout applications. Packer flow tests prior to and after each grout application measure the effectiveness of the grout application in reducing the permeability of the rock surrounding the borehole. Overall the grout applications have reduced the permeability of the test hole by three orders of magnitude.

Keywords

Grouting geologic repository rock mechanics fractured rock mass permeability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, L.A. (1981) Rock property analysis of core samples from the Yucca mountain VE25a-1 borehole, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Open-File Report 81-1338, prepared by the US Geological Survey, for Nevada Operations Office, US Dept. of Energy.Google Scholar
  2. Bear, J. (1979)Hydraulics of groundwater, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, B. (1984) Performance characteristics of microfine cement, ASCE preprint 84-023, Atlanta, Georgia, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, A. and Groskopf, G. (1984) Groutability ratio for filter blocking of joints in rock,Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Evanston, Illinois, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, New York, pp. 899–906.Google Scholar
  5. Deere, D. and Lombardi, G. (1985) Grout slurries — thick or thin?Proceedings of the Session Sponsored by the ASCE Geotechnical Engineering Division on ‘Issues in Dam Grouting’, Denver Colorado, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 154–162.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, D.D. (1983) Welded tuff characteristics at the Nevada test site and Near Superior, Arizona,Technical Report prepared for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Division of Health, Siting and Waste Management, Office of Research, by the Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  7. Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A. (1979)Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Fuenkajorn, K. and Daemen, J.J.K. (1991) Mechanical characterization of the densely welded Apache Leap tuff,Technical Report, in preparation for Division of Engineering Safety, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, by Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  9. Houlsby, A.C. (1982) Optimum water-cement ratios for rock grouting,Proceedings of the Conference on Grouting in Geotechnical Eng., New Orleans, Louisiana, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 319–321.Google Scholar
  10. Lau, D. and Crawford, A. (1986) Grouting For The Underground Containment of Radioactive Waste.Technical Report prepared for the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, by the Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell, J.K. (1970) In-place treatment of foundation soils,Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division,83, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 73–109.Google Scholar
  12. Moller, D.W., Minch, H.L. and Welsh, J.D. (1983) Ultrafine Cement Pressure to Control Water in Fracture Granite Rock,American Concrete Institute Report SP83-8, Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
  13. Sharpe, C.J. and Daemen, J.J.K. (1991) Fracture Grouting in Densely Welded Tuff, Technical Report, in preparation for Division of Engineering Safety, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, by Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  14. Shimoda, M. and Ohmori, H. (1982) Ultra fine grouting material,Proceedings of the Conference on Grouting in Geotechnical Eng., New Orleans, Louisiana, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
  15. Zimmerman, R.M., Nimick, F.B. and Board, M.P. (1985) Geoengineering characterization of welded tuffs from laboratory and field investigations, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII,44,Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 547–554.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Crouthamel
    • 1
  • J. J. K. Daemen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mining and Geological EngineeringUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mining EngineeringUniversity of Nevada-RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations