Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 617–632 | Cite as

Estimates of site seismicity rates using ill-defined macroseismic data

  • Luca Magri
  • Marco Mucciarelli
  • Dario Albarello
Article

Abstract

A new approach to the problem of site seismic hazard analysis is proposed, based on intensity data affected by uncertainties. This approach takes into account the ordinal and discrete character of intensities, trying to avoid misleading results due to the assumption that intensity can be treated as a real number (continuous distribution estimators, attenuation relationships, etc.). The proposed formulation is based on the use of a distribution function describing, for each earthquake, the probability that site seismic effects can be described by each possible intensity value. In order to obtain site hazard estimates where local data are lacking, the dependence of this distribution function with the distance from the macroseismic epicenter and with epicentral intensity is examined. A methodology has been developed for the purpose of combining such probabilities and estimating site seismicity rates which takes into account the effect of uncertainties involved in this kind of analysis. An application of this approach is described and discussed.

Key words

Seismic hazard macroseismic intensity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Båth, M., andDuda, S. J. (1964),Earthquake Volume, Fault Plane Area, Seismic Energy, Strain, Deformation and Relate Quantities, Ann. Geofis.17, 353–368.Google Scholar
  2. Berardi, R., Margi, L., andMucciarelli, M. (1990),Do Different Experts and Computer Programs Agree on the Interpretation of the Same Intensity Map? Proceedings of XII General ESC Assembly, Generalitat de Catalunya, I, 371–376.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, A. (1941),On the Estimation of Focal Depth from Macroseismic Data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.31, 225–231.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D. R.,The analysis of Binary Data (Methuen and Co., London 1970) 135 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Fletcher, R. (1972),Fortran Subroutines for Minimization by Quasi-Newtonian Methods, Report R7125 AERE, Harwell, England.Google Scholar
  6. Howell, B. F., andShultz, T. R. (1975),Attenuation of Modified Mercalli Intensity with Distance from Epicenter, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.65, 651–665.Google Scholar
  7. Monachesi, H., andMoroni, A. (1993),Problems in Assessing Macroseismic Intensity from Historical Earthquake Records, Terra Nova5 (5), 463–466.Google Scholar
  8. Mulargia, F., Gasperini, P., andTinti, S. (1987),A Procedure to Identify Objectively Active Seismotectonic Structures, Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl.29, (114), 147–164.Google Scholar
  9. Postpischl, D. (ed.) (1985a),Atlas of Isoseismal Maps of Italian Earthquakes, Quaderni della Ricerca Scientifica114 (2A), 164 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Postpischl, D. (ed.) (1985b),Catadogue of Italian Earthquakes from 1000 up to 1980, Quaderni della Ricerca Scientifica114 (2B2), 240 pp.Google Scholar
  11. von Kovesligethy, R. (1906),Seismonomia, Boll. Soc. Sism. Ital., XIV.Google Scholar
  12. Vogt, J. (1991),Some Glimpses at Historical Seismology, Tectonophysics193, 1–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Magri
    • 1
  • Marco Mucciarelli
    • 1
  • Dario Albarello
    • 2
  1. 1.ISMESBergamoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze della TerraUniversitá di SienaItaly

Personalised recommendations