Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 100–115 | Cite as

Aftershocks of February 19, 1968 earthquake in Northern Aegean Sea and related problems

  • J. C. Drakopoulos
  • A. C. Ekonomides
Article

Summary

The aftershock activity associated with the North Aegean Sea earthquake of February 19, 1968 (M s =7.1) has been studied with emphasis on the time and magnitude distributions. Regarding the focal mechanism it was noted that the sense of first motion remains rather unchanged throughout the sequence.

The secondary series are not distinct in space or time or mechanism from the primary sequence. Although the main shock was followed by almost 3000 aftershocks (M L ≧2.1) which form the basis for this study, principal strain has been released by the main shock which is responsible for the 82 per cent of total strain release in the sequence.

Keywords

Primary Sequence Related Problem Focal Mechanism Total Strain Main Shock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. Benioff,Earthquake and Rock Creep, Part I, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.41 (1951), 31–62.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Mogi,The Fracture of a Semi-Infinite Body Caused by an Inner Stress Origin and its Relation to the Earthquake Phenomena, Bull. Earth. Res. Inst.41 (1963a), 595–614.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Papageorgakis,et al. The Earthquake of Saint Eustratios and Lemnos, (In Greek) (Athens, 1968).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Galanopoulos,On the mapping of the Seismic Activity in Greece, Ann. di Geof.16 (1963), 37–100.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Galanopoulos,The Large Conjugate Foult System and the Associated Earthquake Activity in Greece, Ann. Geol. Pays Hellén18 (1965), 119–134.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. Utsu,A Statistical Study on the Occurrence of Aftershocks, Geoph. Magaz. Japan Met. Agency, Tokyo38 (1961), 521–605.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Mogi,On the Time Distribution of Aftershocks Accompanying the Recent Major in and near Japan, Bull. Earth. Res. Inst.40 (1962a), 107–124.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Drakopoulos,Characteristic Parameters of Fore- and Aftershock Sequences in the Region of Greece Dissertation (1968), 1–29.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Gutenberg andC. Richter,Frequency of Earthquakes in California, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.34 (1944), 185–188.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Utsu,A Method for Determining the Value of b in the Formula long η=a−b M Showing the Magnitude Frequency Relation for Earthquakes (In Japanese with English abstract), Geoph. Bull. Hokkaido Univ.13 (1965), 99–104.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Drakopoulos,A Statistical Model on the Occurrence of Aftershocks in the Area of Greece, Bull. Int. Inst. Seism. and Earth. Engineer.8 (1971), 14–31.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    N. Delibasis andJ. Drakopoulos,Focal Mechanism of Earthquakes in the North Aegean Sea, 1965–1968 and Related Problems under publication (1971).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Udias,A Study of the Aftershocks and Focal Mechanism of the Salinas-Watsonville Earthquakes of August 31 and September 14, 1963 Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.55 (1965), 85–106.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Drakopoulos andH. Srivastava,Investigations of the Aftershocks of July 4, 1968 Earthquake in Epidavros, Ann. di Geof.23 (1970), 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Drakopoulos
  • A. C. Ekonomides
    • 1
  1. 1.Seismological LaboratoryAthens UniversityAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations