Journal of Neurology

, Volume 243, Issue 9, pp 633–637 | Cite as

“Echoing approval”: A new speech disorder

  • J. Ghika
  • J. Bogousslavsky
  • F. Ghika-Schmid
  • F. Regli
Original Communication


We report the cases of two patients presenting a peculiar speech disorder, which we have named “echoing approval”, in which the patients echo, in replying to questions in a dialogue with short phrases, the positive or negative syntactical construction of a question, or its positive or negative intonation, but without any repetition of whole or part of sentences. When asked about their symptoms, the patients replied 80% of the time with “yes, yes”, “that's right”, or “exactly” to positive questions and “no, no” or “absolutely not” to negative questions, regardless of their actual symptoms and oblivious to self-contradiction. In addition, when the examining doctor was speaking to a medical colleague in the patient's presence and using medical terminology that the patient did not understand, he/she agreed or disagreed with any sentence and technical word uttered in a way entirely dependent on the syntax or intonation used. To distinguish this speech disorder from echolalia or verbal perseverations, with which it may be superficially confused, we suggest that it be called “echoing approval”, as it may be part one of the manifestations of the environment-dependency syndrome. This clinical picture was found to be associated with features of transcortical motor aphasia and frontal lobe signs. One patient had a bilateral callosofrontal malignant glioma and the other a probable multiple system atrophy with global deterioration, pre-eminent frontal release signs, diffuse leukoencephalopathy and multiple lacunes. On the basis of these clinical deficits and neuroimaging features, we are unable to delineate the common, or minimal, lesioned network required for this symptomatology to occur, especially in the absence of a series of patients, and with such a difference in both the location and causes of the lesions. However, bilateral frontosubcortical dysfunction was pre-eminent in the clinical picture in both patients, even though more diffuse brain pathology was seen in one, and it might be speculated that dysfunction of the bilateral orbitofrontal and frontomesial motor frontosubcortical circuits might be involved in the aetiology of this peculiar speech disorder.

Key words

Echoing Speech Fronto-subcortical circuit Environment dependency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Liebaldt GP, Scheller H, Schleip I (1975) Anatomic localization of echolalic phenomena in the CNS. Pathology of spontaneity in human speech. Nervenarzt 46:422–433Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Környey E (1975) Aphasie transcorticale et echolalie: le problème de l'initiation de la parole. Rev Neurol (Paris) 131:347–363Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benassi V (1972) Imitation and functional speech in autistic children: a reply to Hartung. J Speech Hear Disord 37:421–422Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scherer NJ, Olswang LB (1989) Using structured discourse as a language intervention technique with autistic children. J Speech Hear Disord 54:383–394Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garber NB, David LE (1975) Semantic considerations in the treatment of echolalia. Ment Retard 13:8–11Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shapiro T, Lucy P (1978) Echoing in autistic children: a chronometric study of semantic processing. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 19:373–378Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paccia JM, Curcio F (1982) Language processing and forms of immediate echolalia in autistic children. J Speech Hear Res 25:42–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Assal G (1985) Batterie des examens neuropsychologiques du CHUVGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buttet J, Assal G (1980) Etude du conflit entre la prosodie et la syntaxe dans la parole comprimée. Rev Neurol (Paris) 10:665–667Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santo Pietro MJ, Rigrodsky S (1986) Patterns of oral-verbal perseveration in adult aphasics. Brain Lang 29:1–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lhermitte F (1986) Human anatomy and the frontal lobes. II. Patient behavior in complex and social situations: the “environmental dependency syndrome”. Ann Neurol 19:335–343Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghika J, Tennis M, Hoffmann E, Johnson K, Ghika J (1995) Environmentdriven behaviors in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci 130:104–111Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, deLong MR (1990) Basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, “prefontal” and “limbic” functions. Prog Brain Res 85:119–146Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sass KJ, Novelly RA, Spencer DD, Spencer SS (1990) Postcallosotomy language impairments in patients with crossed cerebral dominance. J Neurosurg 72:85–90Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naeser MA, Palumbo CL, Helm-Estabrooks N, Stiassny-Eder D, Albert ML (1989) Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech. Brain 112:1–38Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alexander MP, Warren RL (1988) Localization of callosal auditory pathways: a CT case study. Neurology 38: 802–804Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cambier J, Elghozi D, Khouri M, Struke A (1980) Répétition écholalique et troubles sévères de la compréhension: syndrome de déactivation de l'hémisphère gauche? Rev Neurol (Paris) 136:89–98Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barat M, Mazaux JM, Bioulac B, Giroire JM, Vital C, Arné L (1981) Troubles du language de type aphasique dans les lésions putaminocaudées. Observation anatomy-clinique. Rev Neurol (Paris) 137:343–356Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milner B, Petrides M (1984) Behavioural effects of frontal-lobe lesions in man. Trends Neurosci 7:403–407Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ghika
    • 1
  • J. Bogousslavsky
    • 1
  • F. Ghika-Schmid
    • 1
  • F. Regli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyCHUVLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations