Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Automatic decomposition electromyography in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

  • 41 Accesses

  • 4 Citations


Automatic decomposition electromyography (ADEMG) is a commercially available software package with installed reference values that enables the objective measurement of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs). To assess the diagnostic yield of this package in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) we performed biceps brachii ADEMG in 17 patients with polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. Results were compared with those in 12 controls, and with the results of conventional EMG of the biceps and other muscles. Decreased mean values for MUAP duration occurred significantly more frequently in IIM patients than in controls; other MUAP characteristics did not differ. In IIM patients, decreased mean amplitude and increased mean number of turns occurred significantly less frequently on ADEMG than did corresponding abnormalities on conventional biceps EMG. Decreased mean values for duration and amplitude, and increased mean values for number of turns were seen significantly less often on ADEMG than corresponding abnormalities on conventional EMG of four different, individually chosen muscles. Overall evaluation of ADEMG resulted in a diagnosis of “possible myopathy” in 1 and “probable myopathy” in 8 patients, whereas overall evaluation of conventional EMG led to a diagnosis “suggestive of IIM” in 13 patients. We conclude that, although measurement of mean MUAP duration might be valuable in IIM diagnosis, our results do not favour the use of biceps brachii ADEMG and the installed reference values for the diagnosis of IIM. We suggest modifications to improve ADEMG's applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Buchthal F (1958) Einfuehrung in die Elektromyographie. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich, p 34

  2. 2.

    Chan RC, Hsu TC (1992) Motor unit potential analysis under submaximal contraction: ADEMG study in normal and radiculopathy (English abstract). Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chin 50:19–25

  3. 3.

    Dalakas MC (1991) Polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion-body myositis. N Engl J Med 325:1487–1498

  4. 4.

    Daube JR (1991) AAEE Minimonograph no. 11: Needle examination in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve 14:685–700

  5. 5.

    Dorfman LJ, McGill KC (1988) AAEE Minimonograph no.29: Automatic quantitative electromyography. Muscle Nerve 11:804–818

  6. 6.

    Dorfman LJ, Howard JE, McGill KC (1989) Motor unit firing rates and firing rate variability in the detection of neuromuscular disorders. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 73:215–224

  7. 7.

    Dorfman LJ, Howard JE, McGill KC (1989) Clinical studies using automatic decomposition electromyography (ADEMG) in needle and surface EMG. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Computer-aided electromyography and expert-systems. Elsevier, The Hague, pp 198–204

  8. 8.

    Falck B, Andreassen S, Groth T, Lang H, Melander M, Nurmi A, Puusa A, Rosenfalck A, Stalberg E (1991) The development of a multicenter database for reference values in clinical neurophysiology — principles and examples. Computer Methods Programs Biomed 34:145–162

  9. 9.

    Fuglsang-Frederiksen A (1987) Quantitative electromyography. I. Comparison of different methods. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 27:327–333

  10. 10.

    Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I, Rowinska-Marcinska K, Emeryk-Szajewska B, Ryniewicz B, Kopec A, Kopec J, Szmidt-Salkowska E (1988) The diagnostic yield of automated EMG analysis in neuromuscular diseases. Acta Physiol Pol 39:11–19

  11. 11.

    Howard JE, McGill KC, Dorfman LJ (1988) Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis. Muscle Nerve 11:1051–1055

  12. 12.

    Iani C, Stalberg E, Falck B, Bishoff C (1994) New approaches to motor unit potential analysis. Proceedings of the Comprehensive EMG Congress, 26–29 April 1994, Uppsala, chapter 14

  13. 13.

    Kimura J (1989) Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle. Davis, Philadelphia

  14. 14.

    McGill KC, Dorfman LJ (1989) Automatic decomposition electromyography (ADEMG). Methodological and technical considerations. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Computer-aided electromyography and expert-systems. Elsevier, The Hague, pp 91–101

  15. 15.

    McGill KC, Cummins KL, Dorfman LJ (1985) Automatic decomposition of the clinic electromyogram. IEEE Trans Biol Eng BME-32:470–477

  16. 16.

    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stalberg EV (1986) Automatic analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern. II. Findings in control subjects and in some neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve 9:491–500

  17. 17.

    Robinson LR (1991) AAEE Case report no.22: Polymyositis. Muscle Nerve 14:310–315

  18. 18.

    Sandstedt PER, Henriksson KG, Larsson L-E (1982) Quantitative electromyography in polymyositis and dermatomyositis, a long-term study. Acta Neurol Scand 65:110–121

  19. 19.

    Stalberg E, Andreassen S, Falck B, Lang H, Rosenfalck A, Trojaborg W (1986) Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials: a proposition for standardized terminology and criteria for measurement. J Clinical Neurophysiol 3:313–348

  20. 20.

    Walton J (1988) Inflammatory disorders of muscle: clinical features and differential diagnosis. In: Mastaglia FL (ed) Inflammatory diseases of muscle. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–16

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Peter J. H. Jongen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jongen, P.J.H., Vingerhoets, H.M., Roeleveld, K. et al. Automatic decomposition electromyography in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. J Neurol 243, 79–85 (1996).

Download citation

Key words

  • Electromyography
  • Automatic decomposition electromyography
  • Polymyositis
  • Dermatomyositis