Advertisement

International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 157–183 | Cite as

Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide

  • Lawrence H. Goulder
Article

Abstract

There has been considerable debate as to whether the revenue-neutral substitution of environmental taxes for ordinary income taxes might offer a double dividend: not only (1) improve the environment but also (2) reduce certain costs of the tax system. This paper articulates different notions of double dividend and examines the theoretical and empirical evidence for each. It also connects the double-dividend issue with principles of optimal environmental taxation in a second-best setting.

A weak double-dividend claim-that returning tax revenues through cuts in distortionary taxes leads to cost savings relative to the case where revenues are returned lump sum-is easily defended on theoretical grounds and (thankfully) receives wide support from numerical simulations. The stronger versions contend that revenueneutral swaps of environmental taxes for ordinary distortionary taxes involve zero or negative gross costs. Theoretical analyses and numerical results tend to cast doubt on the strong double-dividend claim, although the theoretical case is not air-tight and the numerical evidence is mixed.

Key words

environmental taxation environmental tax reform second-best environmental taxation double-dividend general equilibrium tax analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, Anthony B., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. (1980).Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach, Alan J., and Laurence J. Kotlikoff. (1987).Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, Charles L., and Don Fullerton. (1992). “Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(3), 117–131.Google Scholar
  4. Ballard, Charles L., and Steven G. Medema. (1993). “The Marginal Efficiency Effects of Taxes and Subsidies in the Presence of Externalities.”Journal of Public Economics 52, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballard, Charles L., John B. Shoven, and John Whalley. (1985). “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the U.S.”American Economic Review 75(1), 128–138.Google Scholar
  6. Bertrand, T.J., and J. Vanek. (1971). “The Theory of Tariffs, Taxes, and Subsidies: Some Aspects of the Second Best.”American Economic Review 61, 925–931.Google Scholar
  7. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1992). “Environmental Taxation and Labor Market Distortions,” Working Paper, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, March. Forthcoming inEuropean Journal of Political Economy.Google Scholar
  8. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1994a). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation.”American Economic Review, September, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 1085–1089.Google Scholar
  9. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1994b). “Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth.” Working Paper, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  10. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Lawrence H. Goulder. (1994a). “Inegrating Environmental and Distortionary Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses.” Working Paper, Stanford University, March.Google Scholar
  11. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Lawrence H. Goulder. (1994b). “Optimal Environmental Taxataion in the Presence of Other Taxes: An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” Working Paper, Stanford University, May.Google Scholar
  12. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and F. van der Ploeg. (1993). “Consequences of Environmental Tax Reform for Involuntary Unemployment and Welfare.” Working Paper, Tilburg University, September.Google Scholar
  13. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and F. van der Ploeg. (1994a). “Environmental Policy, Public Finance and the Labor Market in a Second-Best World.”Journal of Public Economics 55, 349–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and F. van der Ploeg. (1994b). “Green Policies in a Small Open Economy.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics 96(3), 343–363.Google Scholar
  15. Brendemoen, Anne, and Haakon Vennemo. (1993). “The Marginal Cost of Funds in the Presence of External Effects.” Discussion Paper No. 99, Research Department, Central Bureau of Statistics, Norway, August.Google Scholar
  16. Carraro, Carlo, Marzio Geleotti, and Massimo Gallo. (1994). “Environmental Taxation and Unemployment: Some Evidence on the Double Dividend Hypothesis in Europe.” Working Paper, GRETA Econometrics, May.Google Scholar
  17. Dasgupta, Partha S., and Geoffrey M. Heal. (1979).Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deaton, Angus. (1987). “Econometric Issues for Tax Design in Developing Countries.” In David Newbery and Nicholas Stern, (eds.),The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Diamond, Peter, and J. Mirrlees. (1971). “Optimal Taxation and Public Production I: Production Efficiency and II: Tax Rules.”American Economic Review 61.Google Scholar
  20. Dixit, Avinash. (1975). “Welfare Effects of Tax and Price Changes.”Journal of Public Economics 4(1), 103–123.Google Scholar
  21. Gaskins, Darius, and John Weyant. (1995).Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goulder, Lawrence H. (1994a). “Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis.” Working Paper, Stanford University, July. Forthcoming inJournal of Environmental Economics and Management.Google Scholar
  23. Goulder, Lawrence H. (1994b). “Energy Taxes: Traditional Efficiency Effects and Environmental Implications.” In James M. Poterba, (ed.),Tax Policy and the Economy 8. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hausman, Jerry A. (1985). “Taxes and Labor Supply.” In A.J. Auerbach and Martin S. Feldstein (eds.),Handbook of Public Economics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  25. Jorgenson, Dale W., and Peter J. Wilcoxen. (1990). “Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth.”Rand Journal of Economics 21(2), 314–340.Google Scholar
  26. Jorgenson, Dale W., and Peter J. Wilcoxen. (1995). “Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment.” In Darius Gaskins and John Weyant (eds.),Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jorgenson, Dale W., and Kun-Young Yun. (1990).Tax Policy and the Cost of Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kneese, Allen V., and Blair T. Bower. (1968).Managing Witter Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, Dwight, R., and Walter S. Misiolek. (1986). “Substituting Pollution Taxation for General-Taxation: Some Implications for Efficiency in Pollution Taxation.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 338–347.Google Scholar
  30. Ligthart, Jenny E., and Frederick van der Ploeg. (1994). “Pollution, the Cost of Public Funds and Endogenous Growth.” Working Paper, University of Amsterdam, October. Forthcoming inEconomic Letters.Google Scholar
  31. Lipsey, R.G., and K. Lancaster. (1956). “The General Theory of the Second Best.”Review of Economic Studies 24, 11–32.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, Albert L. (1984).Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nordhaus, William D. (1993). “Optimal Greenhouse-Gas Reductions and Tax Policy in the ‘DICE’ Model.”American Economic Review 83(2) (Papers and Proceedings), 313–317.Google Scholar
  34. Oates, Wallace E. (1991). “Pollution Charges as a Source of Public Revenues.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper QE92-05. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, November.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (1992).The Economic Costs of Reducing CO 2 Emissions. OECD Economic Studies 19. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Parry, Ian W.H. (1994). “Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling.” Working Paper, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, April.Google Scholar
  37. Pearce, David W. (1991). “The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjuting to Global Warming.”Economic Journal 101, 938–948.Google Scholar
  38. Pezzey, John. (1992). “Some Interactions between Environmental Policy and Public Finance.” Working Paper, University of Bristol, June.Google Scholar
  39. Pigou, A.C. (1938).The Economics of Welfare (4th ed.). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  40. Poterba, James M. (1991). “Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax.” In Rudiger Dornbusch and James M. Poterba, (eds.),Global Warming Economic Policy Responses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Poterba, James M. (1993). “Global Warming: A Public Finance Perspective.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4), 47–63.Google Scholar
  42. Proost, Stef, and Denise van Regemorter. (1994). “Testing the Double Dividend Hypothesis for a Carbon Tax in a Small Open Economy.” Working Paper, Center for Economic Studies, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  43. Repetto, Robert, Roger C. Dower, Robin Jenkins, and Jacqueline Geoghegan. (1992).Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy. World Resources Institute, November, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  44. Sandmo, Agnar. (1975). “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.”Swedish Journal of Economics 77, pp. 86–98.Google Scholar
  45. Schöb, Ronnie. (1994). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: Environmental View vs. Public Finance View.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Munich, June.Google Scholar
  46. Shackleton, Robert, Michael Shelby, Alex Cristofero, Roger Brinner, Joyce Yanchar, Lawrence Goulder, Dale Jorgenson, Peter Wilcoxen, and Peter Pauly. (1992). “The Efficiency Value of Carbon Tax Revenues.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November, draft manuscript.Google Scholar
  47. Shah, Anar, and Bjorn Larsen. (1992). “Carbon Taxes, the Greenhouse Effect and Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 957. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  48. Sörenson, Peter B., Lars H. Pedersen, and Soren B. Nielsen. (1994). “Taxation, Pollution, Unemployment and Growth: Could There Be a Triple Dividend from a Green Tax Reform?” Working Paper, Economic Policy Research Unit, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  49. Sweeney, James L. (1977). “Economics of Depletable Resources: Market Forces and Intertemporal Bias.”Review of Economic Studies 44, 125–142.Google Scholar
  50. Sweeney, James L. (1993). “Economic Theory of Depletable Resources: An Introduction.” In Allen V. Kneese and James L. Sweeney, (eds.),Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics (Vol. 3). New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  51. Terkla, David. (1984). “The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 107–123.Google Scholar
  52. Tullock, Gordon. (1967). “Excess Benefit.”Water Resources Research 3, 643–644.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence H. Goulder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Landau Economics BuildingStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations