Aquatic Sciences

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 173–178 | Cite as

Field observations on the production of rainbow trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) under high concentrations of water-borne iron

  • W. Steffens
  • Th. Mattheis
  • M. Riedel
Article

Abstract

Effluents from brown coal mines are frequently rich in iron, the water being red-brown in colour and turbid. For several years a fish farm in the Lusatia (Brandenburg, Germany) has used such mine effluents for rearing rainbow trout. The total iron content of this water varies between 5 and 10 mg/l with pH ranging from 6.7 to 7.4. Water turbidity is high with a transparency of 10 to 40 cm at the most due to the substantial ferric hydroxide concentrations. Until 1989 trout have been reared in net cages within concrete settling basins destined for settling the ferric hydroxide mud. The cages were stocked with fingerlings in autumn, reaching portion size in the spring of the following year. Specific growth rate was 0.98% per day, comparable to that of trout in another farm unpolluted by iron but stocked at higher densities. The results show that fingerling rainbow trout may live in water containing more than 5 mg/l total iron but in the absence of Fe2+. These concentrations of water-borne iron seem to have only a limited detrimental effect on fish growth and feed conversion and do not prevent trout culture in principle.

Key words

Heavy metal water-borne iron ferric hydroxide rainbow trout 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amelung, M., 1981. Auswirkungen gelöster Eisenverbindungen auf die Ei- und Larvalentwicklung vonSalmo gairdneri (Richardson). Arch. Fischereiwiss. 32:77–87.Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, J., 1963. Transformation of iron and sulphur compounds in soil and its relation to Danish inland fisheries. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 92:260–264.Google Scholar
  3. Decker, C. and R. Menendez, 1974. Acute toxity of iron and aluminium to brook trout. Proc. W. Va. Acad. Sci. 46:159–167 (cited from JWPCF Literature Rev. 49 (1977):1444).Google Scholar
  4. Fredrich, F. and W. Steffens, 1983. Schneller Zuwachs und gute Futterverwertung durch günstige Wassertemperaturen in der Forellenproduktion. Z. Binnenfischerei DDR 30:239–242.Google Scholar
  5. Lukowicz, M. von, 1969. Schäden durch Eisen in der Winterung. Der Fischbauer 20:1025–1026.Google Scholar
  6. Lukowicz, M. von, 1976. Der Eisengehalt im Wasser und seine Wirkung auf den Fisch. Fisch und Umwelt 2:85–92.Google Scholar
  7. Mattheis, Th., 1988. Datensammlung der Grenzkonzentrationen von Schadstoffen für die Fischproduktion — Metalle und Metalloide. Fortschr. Fisch. wiss. 7:29–82.Google Scholar
  8. Riedel, M., 1990. Möglichkeiten der Produktion von Speiseforellen in der Grubenwasserreinigungsanlage des Kraftwerkes Jänschwalde. Berlin, Diplomarbeit Humboldt-Universität, Fakultät für Landwirtschaft und Gartenbau. 68p.Google Scholar
  9. Schäperclaus, W., 1990. Fischkrankheiten. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag. 1123 p.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, E.J. and J.L. Sykora, 1976. Early developmental effects of lime-neutralized iron hydroxide suspensions on brook trout and coho salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 105:308–312.Google Scholar
  11. Sykora, J.L., E.J. Smith and M. Synak, 1972. Effects of lime-neutralized iron hydroxide suspensions on juvenile brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Water Res. 6:935–950.Google Scholar
  12. Sykora, J.L., E.J. Smith, M. Synak and M.A. Shapiro, 1975. Some observations on spawning of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in lime-neutralized iron hydroxide suspensions. Water Res. 9:451–458.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Steffens
    • 1
  • Th. Mattheis
    • 1
  • M. Riedel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Gewässerökologie und BinnenfischereiBerlin-FriedrichshagenGermany

Personalised recommendations