pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 146, Issue 1, pp 67–101 | Cite as

Historical 1942 Ecuador and 1942 Peru subduction earthquakes and earthquake cycles along Colombia-Ecuador and Peru subduction segments

  • Jennifer L Sennson
  • Susan L. Beck


Two large shallow earthquakes occurred in 1942 along the South American subduction zone inclose proximity to subducting oceanic ridges: The 14 May event occurred near the subducting Carnegie ridge off the coast of Ecuador, and the 24 August event occurred off the coast of southwestern Peru near the southern flank of the subducting Nazca ridge. Source parameters for these for these two historic events have been determined using long-periodP waveforms,P-wave first motions, intensities and local tsunami data.

We have analyzed theP waves for these two earthquakes to constrain the focal mechanism, depth, source complexity and seismic moment. Modeling of theP waveform for both events yields a range of acceptable focal mechanisms and depths, all of which are consistent with underthrusting of the Nazca plate beneath the South American plate. The source time function for the 1942 Ecuador event has one simple pulse of moment release with a duration of 22 suconds, suggesting that most of the moment release occurred near the epicenter. The seismic moment determined from theP waves is 6–8×1020N·m, corresponding ot a moment magnitude of 7.8–7.9. The reported location of the maximum intensities (IX) for this event is south of the main shock epicenter. The relocated aftershcks are in an area that is approximately 200 km by 90 km (elongated parallel to the trench) with the majority of aftershocks north of the epicenter. In contrast, the 1942 Peru event has a much longer duration and higher degree of complexity than the Ecuador earthquake, suggesting a heterogeneous rupture. Seismic moment is released in three distinct pulses over approximately 74 seconds; the largest moment release occurs 32 seconds after rupture initiation. the seismic moment as determined from theP waves for the 1942 Peru event is 10–25×1020N·m, corresponding to a moment magnitude of 7.9–8.2. Aftershock locations reported by the ISS occur over a broad area surrounding the main shock. The reported locations of the maximum intensities (IX) are concentrated south of the epicenter, suggesting that at least part of the rupture was to the south.

We have also examined great historic earthquakes along the Colombia-Ecuador and Peru segments of the South American subduction zone. We find that the size and rupture length of the underthrusting earthquakes vary between successive earthquake cycles. This suggests that the segmentation of the plate boundary as defined by earthquakes this century is not constant.

Key words

Earthquke cycle source parameters seismic moment fault heterogeneity P waveforms historical earthquakes source time function seismic gap 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abe, K., (1979),Size of Great Earthquakes of 1837–1979 Inferred from Tsunami Data, J. Geophys. Res.84, 1561–1568.Google Scholar
  2. Abe, K. (1981),Magnitudes of Large Shallow Earthquakes from 1904 to 1980, Phys. of the Earth and Planet. Int.27, 72–92.Google Scholar
  3. Ando, M. (1975),Source Mechanisms and Tectonic Significance of Historical Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough, Japan, Tectonophysics27, 119–140.Google Scholar
  4. Askew, B. L., andAlgermissen, S. T. (ed.)Catalog of Earthquakes for South America: Hypocenter and Intensity Data (Ceresis publication, Volumes 4,6 and 7a, b and c, 1985).Google Scholar
  5. Baker, G. E., andLangston C. (1987),Source Parameters of the magnitude 7.1 South Puget Sound, Washington, Earthquake as Determined from Long-period Body Waves and Strong Ground Motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.77, 1530–1557.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, S. L., andNishenko, S. P. (1990),Variations in the Mode of Great Earthquake Rupture Along the Central Peru Subduction Zone, Geophys. Res. Lett.17, 1969–1972.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, S. L., andRuff, L. J. (1984),The Rupture Process of the Great 1979 Colombia Earthquake: Evidence from the Asperity Model, J. Geophys. Res.89, 9281–9291.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, S. L., andRuff, L. J. (1987),Rupture Process of the Great 1963 Kurile Islands Earthquake Sequence: Asperity Interaction and Multiple Event Rupture, J. Geophys Res.92, 14123–14138.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, S. L., andRuff, L. J. (1989),Great Earthquakes and Subduction along the Peru Trench, Phys. of the Earth and Planet. Int.57, 199–224.Google Scholar
  10. Brune, J. N., andEngen, G. R. (1969),Excitation of Mantle Love Waves and Definition of Mantle Wave Magnitude, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.59, 923–933.Google Scholar
  11. Bullen, K. E.,An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology (Cambridge University Press, New York 1963).Google Scholar
  12. Charlier, C., andvan Gils, J. M.,Liste des Stations Séismologiques Mondiales (Observatorie Royal de Belgique, Uccle, 1953).Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, D., andRuff, L. J. (1985),Analysis of the Trade-off between Hypocentral Depth and Source Time Function, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.75, 1637–1656.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. W., andSpence, W., (1979),Seismic Gaps and Source Zones of Recent Large Earthquakes in Coastal Peru, Pure and Appl. Geophys.117, 1148–1171.Google Scholar
  15. Dorbath, L., Cisternas, A., andDorbath, C. (1990),Assessment of the Size of Large and Great Historical Earthquakes in Peru, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.80, 551–576.Google Scholar
  16. Estabrook, C. H. et al. (1994),Body Wave and Surface Wave Analysis of Large and Great Earthquakes along the Eastern Aleutian Arc, 1923–1989: Implication for Future Events, J. Geophys. Res.99, 11643–11662.Google Scholar
  17. Gutenberg, B., andRichter, C. F.,Seismicity of the Earth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1959).Google Scholar
  18. Hatori, T. (1968),Study on Distant Tsunamis Along the Coast of Japan, Part 2, Tsumamis of South American Origin, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo46, 345–359.Google Scholar
  19. Herd, D. G., Youd, T. T., Meyer, H., Arango, J. L., Person, W. J., andMendoza, C. (1981),The Great Tumaco, Colombia Earthquake of 12 December 1979, Science211, 441–445.Google Scholar
  20. Kanamori, H. (1977),The Energy Release in Great Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.82, 2981–2987.Google Scholar
  21. Kanamori, H., andGiven, J. W. (1981),Use of Long-period Surface Waves for Fast Determination of Earthquake Source Parameters, Phys. of the Earth and Planet. Int.27, 8–31.Google Scholar
  22. Kanamori, H., andMcNally, K. C. (1982),Variable Rupture Mode of the Subduction Zone Along the Eucador-Colombia Coast, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.72, 1241–1253.Google Scholar
  23. Kelleher, J. A. (1972),Rupture Zones of Large South American Earthquakes and Some Predictions, J. of Geophys. Res.77, 2087–2103.Google Scholar
  24. Langston, C. A., andHelmberger, D. V. (1975),A Procedure for Modeling Shallow Dislocation Sources, Geophys. J.R. Astr. Soc.42, 117–130.Google Scholar
  25. Lockdidge, P.,Tsunamis in Peru-Chile (Report SE-39, World Data Center A for Solid Earth Geophysics, 1985).Google Scholar
  26. Lynnes, C., andLay, T. (1988),Source Process of the Great 1977 Sumba Earthquake, J. of Geophys. Res.93, 13407–13420.Google Scholar
  27. McComb, H. E., andWest, C. J. (compilers) (1931),List of Seismological Stations of the World, Bull. National Res. Council82.Google Scholar
  28. Mendoza, C., andDewey, J. W. (1984),Seismicity Associated with the Great Colombia-Ecuador Earthquake of 1942, 1958, and 1979: Implications for Barrier Models of Earthquake Rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.74, 577–593.Google Scholar
  29. Nishenko, S. P. (1985),Seismic Potential for Large and Great Interplate Earthquakes Along the Chilean and Southern Peruvian Margins of South America: A Qualitative Reappraisal, J. of Geophys. Res.90, 3589–3615.Google Scholar
  30. Nishenko, S. P. (1991),Circum-Pacific Seismic Potential: 1989–1999, Pure and Appl. Geophys.135 (2), 169–259.Google Scholar
  31. Ruff, L. (1989),Multi-trace Deconvolution with Unknown Trace Scale Factors: Omnilinear Inversion of P and S Waves for Source Time functions, Geophys. Res. Lett.16, 1043–1046.Google Scholar
  32. Ruff, L. J., andKanamori, H. (1983),The Rupture Process and Asperity Distribution of Three Great Earthquakes from Long-period Diffracted P-Waves, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.31, 202–230.Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz, S. Y., Dewey, J. W., andLay, T. (1989),Influence of Fault Plane Heterogeneity on the Seismic Behavior in the Southern Kruile Islands Arc, J. Geophys. Res.94, 5637–5649.Google Scholar
  34. Silgado, E. (1985),Destructive Earthquakes of South America 1530–1894, CERESIS, Volume 10, Lima, Peru, 315 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Thatcher, W. (1983),Order and Diversity in the Modes of Circum-Pacific Earthquake Recurrence, J. Geophys. Res.95, 2609–2623.Google Scholar
  36. Watanabe, H. (1983),Revised Table of Tsunamis Occurring in and Near Japan, Jishin36, 83–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L Sennson
    • 1
  • Susan L. Beck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesUnivesity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations