Elastic finite difference modelling of lower crustal reflections
- 31 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
It is a common feature to observe on deep reflection profiles, short (less than the Fresnel area diameter) and strongly discontinuous lower crustal reflections. Such wave patterns can be attributed to variations in the crustal properties on the scale of a few wavelengths. In order to explain these characteristics, we have computed finite-difference synthetic seismograms for various types of deep heterogeneities. Focusing, defocusing and interference effects were especially studied. The results can only be interpreted in a qualitative manner because our models exhibit departures from the real cases (lower frequency content, and only two-dimensional structures). It is found that simple undulations of the deep interfaces can hardly produce the discontinuous pattern observed, but high velocity intrusions generate complex interferences matching the reflection character of real data. Furthermore, the reflection patterns strongly depend both on length and shape of the inclusions.
Key words
Heterogeneities lower crust modelling reflection seismicPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Andrier, J. F.,Etude de la croûte inférieure litée à partir des enregistrements de la compagne ECORS-Gascogne (Thèse de l'Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 1989).Google Scholar
- Bois, C., Cazes, M., Hirn, A., Mascle, A., Matte, P., Montadert, L., andPinet, B. (1988),Contribution of Deep Seismic Profiling to the Knowledge of the Lower Crust in France and Neighbouring areas, Tectonophysics145, 253–275.Google Scholar
- Dohr, G., andFuchs, K. (1967),Statistical Evaluation of Deep Crustal Reflections in Germany, Geophys.32, 951–967.Google Scholar
- Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, L. W., andGregory, A. R. (1974),Formation Velocity and Density: The Diagnostic Basis for Stratigraphic Traps, Geophys.39, 770–780.Google Scholar
- Gibson, B. S., andLevander, A. R. (1987),Imaging Deep Reflectors in the Presence of Signal-generated Noise, Geophys. J. R. Ast. Soc.89, 19–20.Google Scholar
- Hobbs, R. W., Peddy, C. P., andBirps Group (1987),Is Lower Crustal Layering Related to Extension? Geophys. J. R. Ast. Soc.89, 239–242.Google Scholar
- Lund, C.-E., Roberts, R. G., andJuhlin, C. (1987),The Reflectivity of the Lower Crust in South-western Sweden, Annales Geophysicae,5B(4), 375–380.Google Scholar
- Matthews and theBirp's Group (1987),Some Unsolved BIRPS Problems, Geophys. J. R. Ast. Soc.89, 209–216.Google Scholar
- Neidell, N. S., andPoggiagliomi F. (1977),Stratigraphic modeling and interpretation, geophysical principles and techniques, InSeismic Stratigraphy Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration (ed. Payton, C. E.), American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir26, pp. 389–416.Google Scholar
- Paul, A., andCampillo, M. (1988),Diffraction and Conversion of Elastic Waves at a Corrugated Interface, Geophys.53, 1415–1424.Google Scholar
- Paul, A. andNicollin, F. (1989),Thin Crustal Layering in Norhtern France: Observations and Modeling of the P M P Spectral Content, Geophys. J. Int.99 229–246.Google Scholar
- Peddy, C., Pinet, B., Masson D., Scrutton, R., Sibuet, J. C., Warner, M. R., Lefort, J. P., andSchroeder, I. J. (1989),Crustal Structure from the Goban Spur Continental Margin, Northeast Atlantic, From Deep Seismic Reflection Profiling, J. Geol. Soc.146, 427–437.Google Scholar
- Raynaud, B. (1988a),Diffraction Modeling of 3-D Lower-crustal Reflectors, Geophys. J.93, 149–161.Google Scholar
- Raynaud, B. (1988b),Statistical Modeling of Lower Crustal Reflections, Geophys. J.95, 111–121.Google Scholar
- Reston, T. J. (1987),Spatial Interference, Reflection Character and the Structure of the Lower Crust under Extension. Results from 2D Seismic Modeling, Annales Geophysicae5B, 339–348.Google Scholar
- Virieux, J. (1986),P-SV., Wave Propagation in Heterogeneous Media: Velocity-Stress Finite Differences Method, Geophys.51(4), 889–901.Google Scholar
- Wenzel, F., Sandmeier, K. J., andWalde, W. (1987),Properties of the Lower Crust from Modeling Refraction and Reflection Data, J. Geophys. Res.92(B11), 11575–11583.Google Scholar