Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assessing the application of cognitive moral development theory to business ethics

  • 1054 Accesses

  • 50 Citations

Abstract

Cognitive moral development (CMD) theory has been accepted as a construct to help explain business ethics, social responsibility and other organizational phenomena. This article critically assesses CMD as a construct in business ethics by presenting the history and criticisms of CMD. The value of CMD is evaluated and problems with using CMD as one predictor of ethical decisions are addressed. Researchers are made aware of the major criticisms of CMD theory including disguised value judgments, invariance of stages, and gender bias in the initial scale development. Implications for business ethics research are discussed and opportunities for future research delineated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barry, V.: 1979,Moral Issues in Business (Wadsworth Publishing Co., New York).

  2. Bommer, M., C. Cratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’,Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 265–280.

  3. Boyce, W. D. and L. C. Jensen: 1978,Moral Reasoning: A Psychological-Philosophical Integration (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln).

  4. Carr: 1968, ‘Is Business Bluffing Ethical?’,Harvard Business Review (Jan.–Feb.), 145.

  5. Cressey, D. R. and C. A. Moore: 1983, ‘Managerial Values and Corporate Codes of Ethics’,California Management Review 25 (Summer), 53–77.

  6. Cunningham, M. H.: 1991, ‘Walking the Thin White Line: Role Conflict Models of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior in the Marketing Research Process’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.

  7. Davison, M.: 1979, ‘Internal Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Defining Issues Test’, in J. R. Rest (ed.),Developments in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN), pp. 223–245.

  8. DeGeorge, R.: 1985,Business Ethics (Macmillan, New York).

  9. Derry, R.: 1987, ‘Moral Reasoning in Work-Related Conflicts,’ in W. C. Frederick (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance (JAI Press), pp. 25–49

  10. Dougall, W.: 1908,Social Psychology (John W. Luce, Boston).

  11. Ewell, A. H. Jr.: 1954, ‘Inventory of Values in the Relationship Between Rigidity of Moral Values and the Severity of Functional Psychological Illness: A Study with War Veterans of One Religious Group’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

  12. Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), 87–96.

  13. Ferrell, O. C., L. G. Gresham and J. Fraedrich: 1989, ‘A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing’,Journal of Macromarketing 9 (Fall), 55–64.

  14. Flavell, J. H.: 1982, ‘On Cognitive Development’,Child Development 53, 1–10.

  15. Fraedrich, J. and O. C. Ferrell: 1992, ‘Cognitive Consistency of Marketing Managers in Ethical Situations’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Summer), 245–252.

  16. Geertz, C.: 1983,Local Knowledge (Basic Books, New York).

  17. Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In a Different Voice: Women's Conception of Self and of Morality’,Harvard Educational Review 47(4), 481–517.

  18. Gilligan, C.: 1982,In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

  19. Goolsby, J. R. and S. D. Hunt: 1992, ‘Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 56 (Jan.), 55–68.

  20. Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring), 5–16.

  21. Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’,Academy of Management Review, 366–395.

  22. Keil, F. C.: 1981, ‘Constraints on Knowledge and Cognitive Development’,Psychological Review 88, 197–227.

  23. Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. Goslin (ed.),Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.

  24. Kohlberg, L.: 1971, ‘Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education’, in C. M. Beck, B. S. Crittenden and E. V. Sullivan (eds.),Moral Education: Interdisciplinary Approaches (Toronto University Press, Toronto).

  25. Kohlberg, L.: 1984,Essays on Moral Development: Volume II. The Psychology of Moral Development (Harper and Row, New York).

  26. Kurtines W. and E. B. Grief: 1974, ‘The Development of Moral Thought: Review Evaluation of Kohlberg's Approach’,Psychological Bulletin 81, 453–470.

  27. Levine, C., L. Kohlberg and A. Hewer: 1985, ‘The Current Formulation of Kohlberg's Theory and a Response to Critics’,Human Development 28, 94–100.

  28. Lickona, T.: 1976,Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).

  29. Nelson, D. R. and T. E. Obremski: 1990, ‘Promoting Moral Growth Through Intra-Group Participation’,Journal of Business Ethics 9(9), 731–739.

  30. Phillips, D. C.: 1987,Philosophy, Science and Social Inquiry (Pergamon Press, Oxford, England).

  31. Phillips, D. C. and J. Nicolayer: 1978, ‘Kohlbergian Moral Development: A Progressing or Degenerating Research Program?’,Educational Theory 28, 286–301.

  32. Piaget, J.: 1932,The Moral Judgment of a Child (The Free Press, New York).

  33. Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, ‘Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 9 (Aug.), 639–653.

  34. Rest, J.: 1979,Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test: An Objective Test of Moral Judgment Development (Moral Research Projects, Minneapolis, MN).

  35. Rest, J.: 1986,Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger Publishers, New York).

  36. Rettig, S. and B. Pasamanick: 1959, ‘Changes in Moral Values Among College Students: A Factorial Study’,American Sociological Review 24, 856–863.

  37. Rokeach, M.: 1968,Beliefs, Attitudes and Values (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 547–555.

  38. Strong, K. C. and G. D. Meyer: 1992, ‘An Integrative Descriptive Model of Ethical Decision Making’,Journal of Business Ethics 11(2), 89–94.

  39. Thoma: 1985, ‘On Improving the Relationship Between Moral Reasoning and External Criteria: The Utilizer/Nonutilizer Dimension’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

  40. Trainer, F. E.: 1977, ‘A Critical Analysis of Kohlberg's Contributions to the Study of Moral Thought’,Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 7, 41–63.

  41. Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

  42. Trevino, L. K.: 1992, ‘Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education and Management’,Journal of Business Ethics 11(5), 445–459.

  43. Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’,Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4), 378–385.

  44. Victor, B. and J. B. Cullen: 1987, ‘A Theory and Measure of Ethical Climate in Organizations’, in W. Frederick and L. Preston (eds.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press), pp. 51–71.

  45. Westen, D.: 1985,Self and Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Download references

Author information

Additional information

John Fraedrich is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Southern Illinois University of Carbondale. His areas of interest include ethical decision making and international marketing. He has published inJournal of Macromarketing, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Marketing Management, International Journal of Value Based Management, andJournal of International Consumer Marketing. Dr. Fraedrich is co-author of a textbookBusiness Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, Second Edition.

Debbie M. Thorne is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at the University of Tampa. Her areas of interest include business ethics, social network analysis, and cultural issues in organizations. She received a Ph.D. in 1993 and has published in theJournal of Teaching in International Business and numerous conference proceedings.

O. C. Ferrell is Interim Dean and Distinguished Professor of Marketing and Business Ethics in the Fogelman College of Business and Economics at Memphis State University. Dr. Ferrell was chairman of the American Marketing Association Ethics Committee that developed the current AMA Code of Ethics. He has published articles on business ethics in theJournal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Macromarketing, Human Relations, Journal of Business Ethics, as well as others. He has co-authored ten textbooks includingBusiness Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, Second Edition, and a tradebook,In Pursuit of Ethics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraedrich, J., Thorne, D.M. & Ferrell, O.C. Assessing the application of cognitive moral development theory to business ethics. J Bus Ethics 13, 829–838 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876263

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Ethic Research
  • Business Ethic
  • Social Responsibility
  • Development Theory