pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 129, Issue 1–2, pp 263–282

Do trench sediments affect great earthquake occurrence in subduction zones?

  • Larry J. Ruff
Article

Abstract

Seismic energy release is dominated by the underthrusting earthquakes in subduction zones, and this energy release is further concentrated in a few subduction zones. While some subduction zones are characterized by the occurrence of great earthquakes, others are relatively aseismic. This variation in maximum earthquake size between subduction zones is one of the most important features of global seismicity. Previous work has shown that the variation in maximum earthquake size is correlated with the variation in two other subduction zone properties: age of the subducting lithosphere and convergence rate. These two properties do not explain all the variance in maximum earthquake size. I propose that a third subduction zone property, “trench sediments”, explains part of the remaining variance in maximum earthquake size. Subduction zones are divided into two groups: (1) those with excess trench sediments, and (2) those with horst and graben structure at the trench. Thirteen of the 19 largest subduction zone events, including the three largest, occur in zones with excess trench sediments. About half the zones with excess trench sediments are characterized by great earthquake occurrence. Most of the other zones with excess trench sediments but without great earthquakes are predicted to have small earthquakes by the age-rate correlation. Two notable exceptions are the Oregon-Washington and Middle America zones. Overall, the presence of excess trench sediments appears to enhance great earthquake occurrence. One speculative physical mechanism that connects trench sediments and earthquake size is that excess trench sediments are associated with the subduction of a coherent sedimentary layer, which at elevated temperature and pressure, forms a homogeneous and strong contact zone between the plates.

Key words

Subduction zones great earthquakes trench sediments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki, K. (1979),Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault, J. Geophys. Res.84, 6140–6148.Google Scholar
  2. Aki, K.,Strong-motion seismology, in:Earthquakes: Observation, Theory, and Interpretation (edited by H. Kanamori and E. Boschi) (North Holland, New York 1983) pp. 223–250.Google Scholar
  3. Ando, M. (1975),Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the Nankai trough, Japan, Tectonophysics27, 119–140.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, R. C. (1981),Radiogenic isotopes: the case for crustal recycling on a near-steady-state no-continental-growth earth, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. LondonA301, 443–472.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, S. L. andL. J. Ruff (1984),The rupture process of the great 1979 Colombia earthquake: evidence for the asperity model, J. Geophys. Res.89, 9281–9291.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, S. L. andL. J. Ruff (1987),Rupture process of the great 1963 Kurile Islands earthquake sequence: asperity interaction and multiple event rupture, J. Geophys. Res.92, 14,123–14,138.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Menahem, A. (1977),Renormalization of the magnitude scale, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.15, 315–340.Google Scholar
  8. Biju-Duval, B., P. Le Quellec, A. Mascle, V. Renard, andP. Valery (1982),Multibeam bathymetric survey and high resolution seismic investigations on the Barbados Ridge complex (eastern Caribbean): A key to the knowledge and interpretation of an accretionary wedge, Tectonophysics86, 275–304.Google Scholar
  9. Chapple, W. M. andD. W. Forsyth (1979),Earthquakes and bending of plates at trenches, J. Geophys. Res.84, 6729–6749.Google Scholar
  10. Das, S. andK. Aki (1977),Fault planes with barriers: A versatile earthquake model, J. Geophys. Res.82, 5658–5670.Google Scholar
  11. Fedotov, S. A. (1965),Regularities of the distribution of strong earthquakes of Kamchatka, the Kurile Islands, and northeastern Japan, Trudy Inst. Fiz. Zemli Akad. Nauk. SSSR36, 66–93.Google Scholar
  12. Fitch, T. J., R. G. North, andM. W. Shields, (1981),Focal depths and moment tensor representations associated with the great Sumba earthquake, J. Geophys. Res.86, 9357–9374.Google Scholar
  13. Gutengerg, B. andC. F. Richter,Seismicity of the Earth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 2nd ed., 1954) 310 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Heaton, T. H. andS. H. Hartzell (1988),Estimation of strong ground motions from hypothetical earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone, Pacific Northwest, Pure and Appl. Geophys.129, 1/2, 133–203.Google Scholar
  15. Heaton, T. H. andH. Kanamori (1984),Seismic potential associated with subduction in the northwestern United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.74, 933–941.Google Scholar
  16. Hilde, T. W. C. (1983),Sediment subduction versus accretion around the Pacific, Tectonophysics99, 381–397.Google Scholar
  17. House, L. S., L. R. Sykes, J. N. Davies, andK. H. Jacob,Identification of a possible seismic gap near Unalaska Island, eastern Aleutians, Alaska, inEarthquake Prediction, an International Review (edited by D. W. Simpson and P. G. Richards) (American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. 1981) pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
  18. Isacks, B., J. Oliver, andL. Sykes (1968),Seismology and the new global tectonics, J. Geophys. Res.73, 5855–5899.Google Scholar
  19. Jarrard, R. D. (1986),Relations among subduction parameters, Rev. Geophys.24, 217–284.Google Scholar
  20. Kanamori, H. (1971a),Great earthquakes at island arcs and the lithosphere, Tectonophysics12, 187–198.Google Scholar
  21. Kanamori, H. (1971b),Seismological evidence for a lithospheric normal faulting—the Sanriku earthquake of 1933, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.4, 289–300.Google Scholar
  22. Kanamori, H. (1977),The energy release in great earthquakes J. Geophys. Res.82, 2981–2987.Google Scholar
  23. Kanamori, H. (1978),Quantification of earthquakes, Nature271, 411–414.Google Scholar
  24. Kanamori, H.,The nature of seismicity patterns before large earthquakes, inEarthquake Prediction, an International Review (edited by D. W. Simpson and P. G. Richards) (American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C., 1981) pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  25. Kanamori, H.,Global seismicity, inEarthquakes: Observation, Theory, and Interpretation (edited by H. Kanamori and E. Boschi) (North Holland, New York, 1983) pp. 596–608.Google Scholar
  26. Kanamori, H. andD. L. Anderson (1975),Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.65, 1073–1095.Google Scholar
  27. Kanamori, H. andG. S. Stewart (1978),Seismological aspects of the Guatemala earthquake of February 4, 1976, J. Geophys. Res.83, 3427–3434.Google Scholar
  28. Karig, D. E. andR. W. Kay (1981),Fate of sediments on the descending plate at convergent margins, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. LondonA301, 443–472.Google Scholar
  29. Karig, D. E. andG. F. Sharman (1975),Subduction and accretion in trenches, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.86, 377–389.Google Scholar
  30. Kelleher, J. (1972),Rupture zones of large South American earthquakes and some predictions, J. Geophys. Res.77, 2087–2103.Google Scholar
  31. Kelleher, J., J. Savino, H. Rowlett, andW. McCann (1974),Why and where great thrust earthquakes occur along island arcs, J. Geophys. Res.79, 4889–4899.Google Scholar
  32. Kelleher, J., L. Sykes, andJ. Oliver (1973),Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their application to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and the Caribbean, J. Geophys. Res.78, 2547–2585.Google Scholar
  33. Kulm, L. D. andG. A. Fowler,Oregon continental margin structure and stratigraphy—a test of the imbricate thrust model, inThe Geology of Continental Margins (edited by C. A. Burk and C. L. Drake) (Springer, New York, 1974) pp. 261–283.Google Scholar
  34. Kulm, L. D., W. J. Schweller, andA. Masias,A preliminary analysis of the subduction processes along the Andean continental margin, 6° to 45°S, inIsland Arcs, Deep Sea Trenches, and Back-Arc Basins (edited by M. Talwani and W. C. Pitman III) (American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C., 1977) pp. 285–302.Google Scholar
  35. Lay, T., H. Kanamori, andL. Ruff (1982),The asperity model and the nature of large subduction zone earthquakes, Earthquake Pred. Res.1, 3–71.Google Scholar
  36. McCann, W. R., S. P. Nishenko, L. R. Sykes, andJ. Kraus (1979),Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: Seismic potential for major plate boundaries, PAGEOPH117, 1087–1147.Google Scholar
  37. Mogi, K. (1969),Relationship between the occurrence of great earthquakes and tectonic structures, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., Tokyo Univ.47, 429–451.Google Scholar
  38. Newcomb, K. R. andW. R. McCann (1987),Seismic history and seismotectonics of the Sunda arc, J. Geophys. Res.92, 421–439.Google Scholar
  39. Nishenko, S. P. (1985),Seismic potential for large and great interplate earthquakes along the Chilean and southern Peruvian margins of South America: A quantitative reappraisal, J. Geophys. Res.90, 3589–3616.Google Scholar
  40. Nishenko, S. P. andW. R. McCann,Seismic potential for the world's major plate boundaries: 1981, inEarthquake Prediction, an International Review (edited by D. W. Simpson and P. G. Richards) (American Geophysical Union, Washington D. C., 1981), pp. 20–28.Google Scholar
  41. Nur, A. andM. Israel (1980),The role of heterogeneities in faulting, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.21, 225–236.Google Scholar
  42. Plafker, G. andJ. C. Savage (1970),Mechanism of the Chilean earthquakes of May 21 and 22, 1960, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.81, 1001–1030.Google Scholar
  43. Ruff, L. J.,Fault asperities inferred from seismic body waves, inEarthquakes: Observation, Theory, and Observation (edited by H. Kanamori and E. Boschi) (North Holland, New York, 1983) pp. 251–276.Google Scholar
  44. Ruff, L. andH. Kanamori (1980),Seismicity and the subduction process, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.23, 240–252.Google Scholar
  45. Ruff, L. andH. Kanamori (1983a),Seismic coupling and uncoupling at subduction zones, Tectonophysics99, 99–117.Google Scholar
  46. Ruff, L. andH. Kanamori (1983b),The rupture process and asperity distribution of three great earthquakes from long-period diffracted P-waves, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.31, 202–230.Google Scholar
  47. Ruff, L., H. Kanamori, andL. Sykes (1985),The 1957 great Aleutian earthquake, EOS66, 298 (abstract).Google Scholar
  48. Scholl, D. W., M. S. Marlow, andA. K. Cooper,Sediment subduction and offscraping at Pacific margins inIsland Arcs, Deep Sea Trenches, and Back-arc, Basins (edited by M. Talwani, and W. C. Pitman III) (American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C., 1977) pp. 199–210.Google Scholar
  49. Scholl, D. W., R. Von Huene, T. L. Vallier, andD. G. Howell (1980),Sedimentary masses and concepts about tectonic processes at underthrust margins, Geology8, 564–568.Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, S. Y. andL. J. Ruff (1987),Asperity distribution and earthquake occurrence in the southern Kurile Islands arc, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.49, 54–77.Google Scholar
  51. Sykes, L. R. (1971),Aftershock zones of great earthquakes, seismicity gaps, and earthquake prediction for Alaska and the Aleutians, J. Geophys. Res.76, 8021–8041.Google Scholar
  52. Spence, W. (1986),The 1977 Sumba earthquake series: evidence for slab pull force acting at a subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res.91, 7225–7239.Google Scholar
  53. Tajima, F. andH. Kanamori (1985),Global survey of aftershock area expansion patterns, Phys. Earth Planet. Int.40, 77–134.Google Scholar
  54. Uyeda, S. andH. Kanamori (1979),Back-arc opening and the mode of subduction, J. Geophys. Res.84, 1049–1061.Google Scholar
  55. Von Huene, R., M. Langseth, N. Nasu, andH. Okada (1982),A summary of the Cenozoic tectonic history along the IPOD Japan Trench transect, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.93, 829–846.Google Scholar
  56. Wang, C. (1980),Sediment subduction and frictional sliding in a subduction zone, Geology8, 530–533.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry J. Ruff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations