Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 143, Issue 1–3, pp 425–456 | Cite as

Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: Implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust

  • Christian David
  • Teng-Fong Wong
  • Wenlu Zhu
  • Jiaxiang Zhang
Rock Friction and Shear Zone Mechanics: Laboratory Studies

Abstract

Permeability exerts significant control over the development of pore pressure excess in the crust, and it is a physical quantity sensitively dependent on the pore structure and stress state. In many applications, the relation between permeability and effective mean stress is assumed to be exponential and that between permeability and porosity is assumed to be a power law, so that the pressure sensitivity of permeability is characterized by the coefficient γ and the porosity sensitivity by the exponent α. In this study, we investigate experimentally the dependence of permeability on pressure and porosity in five sandstones with porosities ranging from 14% to 35% and we review published experimental data on intact rocks, unconsolidated materials and rock fractures. The laboratory data show that the pressure and porosity sensitivities differ significantly for different compaction mechanisms, but for a given compaction mechanism, the data can often be approximated by the empirical relations. The permeabilities of tight rocks and rock joints show relatively high pressure sensitivity and low porosity sensitivity. A wide range of values for α and γ have been observed in relation to the mechanical compaction of porous rocks, sand and fault gouge, whereas the porosity sensitivity for chemical compaction processes is often observed to be given by α≈3. We show that since the ratio γ/α corresponds to the pore compressibility, the different dependences of permeability on porosity and pressure are related to the pore structure and its compressibility. Guided by the laboratory data, we conduct numerical simulations on the development of pore pressure in crustal tectonic settings according to the models ofWalder andNur (1984) andRice (1992). Laboratory data suggest that the pressure sensitivity of fault gouge is relatively low, and to maintain pore pressure at close to the lithostatic value in the Rice model, a relatively high influx of fluid from below the seismogenic layer is necessary. The fluid may be injected as vertically propagating pressure pulses into the seismogenic system, andRice's (1992) critical condition for the existence of solitary wave is shown to be equivalent to α>1, which is satisfied by most geologic materials in the laboratory. Laboratory data suggest that the porosity sensitivity is relatively high when the permeability is reduced by a coupled mechanical and chemical compaction process. This implies that in a crustal layer, pore pressure may be generated more efficiently than cases studied byWalder andNur (1984) who assumed a relatively low porosity sensitivity of α=2.

Key words

Permeability compaction fluid pressure generation effective pressure fault mechanics fault hydraulics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arch, J., andMaltman, A. (1990),Anisotropic Permeability and Tortuosity in Deformed Wet Sediments, J. Geophys. Res.95, 9035–9045.Google Scholar
  2. Bangs, N., Westbrook, G. K., Ladd, J. W., andBuhl, P. (1990),Seismic Velocities from the Barbados Ridge Complex and Indications of High Pore Pressures in an Accretionary Complex, J. Geophys. Res.95, 8767–8782.Google Scholar
  3. Bernabé, Y. (1986),The Effective Pressure Law for Permeability in Chelmsford Granite and Barre Granite, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci and Geomech. Abst.23, 267–275.Google Scholar
  4. Bernabé, Y. (1987),A Wide Range Permeameter for Use in Rock Physics, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abst.24, 309–315.Google Scholar
  5. Bernabé, Y. (1991),Pore Geometry and Pressure Dependence of the Transport Properties in Sandstones, Geophys.56, 436–446.Google Scholar
  6. Bernabé, Y., Brace, W. F., andEvans, B. (1982),Permeability, Porosity and Pore Geometry of Hot Pressed Calcite, Mech. Mat.1, 173–183.Google Scholar
  7. Blanpied, M. L., Lockner, D. A., andByerlee, J. D. (1992),An Earthquake Mechanism Based on Rapid Sealing of Fault, Nature358, 574–576.Google Scholar
  8. Bourbié, T., andZinzsner, B. (1985),Hydraulic and Acoustic Properties as a Function of Porosity in Fontainebleau Sandstone, J. Geophys. Res.90, 11524–11532.Google Scholar
  9. Brace, W. F. (1965),Some New Measurements of Linear Compressibility of Rocks, J. Geophys. Res.70, 391–398.Google Scholar
  10. Brace, W. F. (1978a),Volume Change During Fracture and Frictional Sliding: A Review, Pure and Appl. Geophys.116, 603–614.Google Scholar
  11. Brace, W. F. (1978b),A Note on Permeability Changes in Geologic Materials due to Stress, Pure and Appl. Geophys.116, 627–633.Google Scholar
  12. Brace, W. F. (1980),Permeability of Crystalline and Argillaceous Rocks, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abst.17, 241–251.Google Scholar
  13. Brace, W. F., Orange, A. S., andMadden, T. R. (1965),The Effect of Pressure on the Electrical Resistivity of Water Saturated Crystalline Rocks, J. Geophys. Res.70, 5669–5678.Google Scholar
  14. Brace, W. F., Walsh, J. B., andFrangos, W. T. (1968),Permeability of Granite under High Pressure, J. Geophys. Res.73, 2225–2236.Google Scholar
  15. Bredehoeft, J. D., andHanshaw, B. B. (1968),On the Maintenance of Anomalous Fluid Pressures. I Thick Sedimentary Sequences, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.79, 1097–1106.Google Scholar
  16. Bredehoeft, J. D., andNorton, D. L.,The Role of Fluids in Crustal Processes (National Academy Press 1990), 170 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Bruno, M. S., Bovberg, C. A., andNakagawa, F. M.,Anisotropic stress influence on the permeability of weakly-cemented sandstones. InRock as a Multidisciplinary Science, Proc. 32nd US Rock Mech. Symp. (ed. J. C. Roegiers) (Balkema 1991), pp. 375–383.Google Scholar
  18. Byerlee, J. (1990),Friction, Overpressure and Fault Normal Compression, Geophys. Res. Lett.17, 2109–2112.Google Scholar
  19. Byrne, T., andFisher, D. (1990),Evidence for a Weak and Overpressured Décollement beneath Sediment-dominated Accretionary Prisms, J. Geophys. Res.95, 9081–9097.Google Scholar
  20. Coyner, K. B. (1984),Effect of Stress, Pore Pressure, and Pore Fluids on Bulk Strain, Velocity, and Permeability in Rocks, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  21. David, C. (1991),La perméabilité et la conductivité électrique des roches dans la croûte: Expériences en laboratoire et modèles théoriques, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
  22. David, C. (1993),Geometry of Flow Path for Fluid Transport in Rocks, J. Geophys. Res.98, 12267–12278.Google Scholar
  23. David, C., andDarot, M. (1989), Permeability and conductivity of sandstones. In Proc. Symp.Rock at Great Depth (eds. Maury, V., and Fourmaintraux, D.) (Balkema 1989) Vol. 1, pp. 203–209.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, D. M., Suppe, J., andDahlen, F. A. (1983),Mechanics of Fold and Thrust Belts and Accretionary Wedges, J. Geophys. Res.88, 1153–1172.Google Scholar
  25. Debschutz, W., Kruckel, U., andSchopper, J. R. (1989), Effects of geostatic stress and pore pressure on the Klinkenberg permeability factor and other fluid flow parameters. In Proc. Symp.Rock at Great Depth (eds. Maury, V., and Fourmaintraux, D.) (Balkema 1989) Vol. 1 pp. 179–186.Google Scholar
  26. Dey, T. N. (1986),Permeability and Electrical Conductivity Changes due to Hydrostatic Stress Cycling of Berea and Muddy J Sandstone, J. Geophys. Res.91, 763–766.Google Scholar
  27. Etheridge, M. A., Wall, V. J., Cox, S. F., andVernon, R. H. (1984),High Fluid Pressures during Regional Metamorphism and Deformation: Implications for Mass Transport and Deformation Mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res.89, 4344–4358.Google Scholar
  28. Fischer, G., andPaterson, M. S.,Measurements of permeability and storage capacity in rocks during deformation at high temperature and pressure. InFault Mechanics and Transport Properties of Rocks (eds. Evans, B., and Wong, T.-f.) (Academic Press 1992) pp. 213–252.Google Scholar
  29. Freeze, R. A., andCherry, J. A.,Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, NJ 1979) 604 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Fyfe, W. F., Price, N. J., andThompson, A. B.,Fluids in the Earth's Crust (Elsevier, NY 1978) 383 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Gavrilenko, P., andGueguen, Y. (1993),Fluid Overpressures and Pressure Solution in the Crust, Tectonophys.217, 91–110.Google Scholar
  32. Hadley, K. (1976),Comparison of Calculated and Observed Crack Densities and Seismic Velocities in Westerly Granite, J. Geophys. Res.81, 3484–3494.Google Scholar
  33. Hubbert, M. K., andRubey, W. W. (1959),Role of Fluid Pressure in the Mechanics of Overthrust Faulting, I. Mechanics of Fluid-filled Porous Solids and its Implications to Overthrust Faulting, Geol. Soc. Am Bull.70, 115–166.Google Scholar
  34. Huenges, E., andWill, G.,Permeability, bulk modulus and complex resistivity in crystalline rocks. InFluid Movements, Element Transport and the Composition of the Deep Crust, NATO ASI, C281 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1989) pp. 361–375.Google Scholar
  35. Karig, D. E. (1990),Experimental and observational constraints on the mechanical behavior in the toes of accretionary prisms. InDeformation Mechanisms, Rheology and Tectonics (eds. Knipe, R. J., and Rutter, E. H.) Geol. Soc. Sp. Pub.54, 383–398.Google Scholar
  36. Kranz, R. L., Frankel, A. D., Engelder, T., andScholz, C. H. (1979),The Permeability of Whole and Jointed Barre Granite, Int. J. Roch Mech. Min. Sci.16, 225–235.Google Scholar
  37. Lachenbruch, A. H., andSass, J. H. (1980),Heat Flow and Energetics of the San Andreas Fault Zone, J. Geophys. Res.85, 6185–6222.Google Scholar
  38. Lachenbruch, A. H., andSass, J. H. (1992),Heat Flow from Cajon Pass, Fault Strength, and Tectonic Implications, J. Geophys. Res.97, 4995–5015.Google Scholar
  39. Lambe, T. W., andWhitman, R. V.,Soil Mechanics (John Wiley, New York 1969), 553 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Lockner, D. A. (1990),Modeling of Brittle Failure and Comparisons to Laboratory Experiments, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  41. Moore, J. C. (1989),Tectonics and Hydrogeology of Accretionary Prisms: Role of the Décollement Zone, J. Struct. Geol.11, 95–106.Google Scholar
  42. Morrow, C., Lockner, D., Hickman, S., Rusanov, M., andRöckel, T. (1994),Effects of Lithology and Depth on the Permeability of Core Samples from the Kola and KTB Drillholes, J. Geophys. Res.99, 7263–7274.Google Scholar
  43. Morrow, C. A., Shi, L. Q., andByerlee, J. D. (1984),Permeability of Fault Gouge under Confining Pressure and Shear Stress, J. Geophys. Res.99, 3193–3200.Google Scholar
  44. Morrow, C. A., Zhang, B., andByerlee, J. D. (1986),Effective Pressure Law for Permeability of Westerly Granite under Cyclic Loading, J. Geophys. Res.91, 3870–3876.Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, P. H., andAnderson, L. A. (1992),Physical Properties of Ash Flow Tuff from Yucca Mountain, Nevada, J. Geophys. Res.97, 6823–6841.Google Scholar
  46. Nur, A., andWalder, J.,Hydraulic pulses in the earth's crust. InFault Mechanics and Transport Properties of Rocks (eds. Evans, B., and Wong, T.-f.) (Academic Press, San Diego 1992), pp. 461–474.Google Scholar
  47. Pratt, H. R., Black, A. D., Brace, W. F., andSwolfs, H. (1977),Elastic and Transport Properties of an in situ Jointed Granite, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr.14, 35–45.Google Scholar
  48. Raven, K. G., andGalf, J. E. (1985),Water Flow in a Natural Rock Fracture as a Function of Stress and Sample Size, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.22, 251–261.Google Scholar
  49. Rice, J. R. (1992),Fault stress states, pore pressure distributions, and the weakness of the San Andreas Fault. InFault Mechanics and Transport Properties of Rocks (eds. Evans, B., and Wong, T.-f.) (Academic Press 1992) pp. 475–503.Google Scholar
  50. Riepe, L., Sachs, W., andSchopper, J. R. (1983),Pressure Effects on Permeability, 8th Eurp. Form. Eval. Symp. Trans., London, Paper B, 1–24.Google Scholar
  51. Torgersen, T. (1991),Crustal-scale Fluid Transport: Magnitude and Mechanisms, Geophys. Res. Lett.18, 917–918.Google Scholar
  52. Trimmer, D., Bonner, B., Heard, H. C., andDuba, A. (1980),Effect of Pressure and Stress on Water Transport in Intact and Fractured Gabbro and Granite, J. Geophys. Res.85, 7059–7071.Google Scholar
  53. Vrolijk, P., Myers, G., andMoore, J. C. (1988),Warm Fluid Migration along Tectonic Melanges in the Kodiak Accretionary Complex, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.93, 10313–10324.Google Scholar
  54. Walder, J., andNur, A. (1984),Porosity Reduction and Crustal Pore Pressure Development, J. Geophys. Res.89, 11539–11548.Google Scholar
  55. Walsh, J. B. (1965),The Effect of Cracks on the Compressibility of Rocks, J. Geophys. Res.70, 381–389.Google Scholar
  56. Walsh, J. B. (1981),Effect of Pore Pressure and Confining Pressure on Fracture Permeability, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.18, 429–435.Google Scholar
  57. Walsh, J. B., andGrosenbaugh, M. A. (1979),A New Model for Analyzing the Effect of Fractures on Compressibility, J. Geophys. Res.84, 3532–3536.Google Scholar
  58. Wong, P.-z., Koplik, J., andTomanic, J. P. (1984),Conductivity and Permeability of Rocks, Phys. Rev.B 30, 6606–6614.Google Scholar
  59. Wong, T.-f., Fredrich, J. T., andGwanmesia, G. B. (1989),Crack Aperture Statistics and Pore Space Fractal Geometry of Westerly Granite and Rutland Quartzite: Implications for an Elastic Contact Model of Rock Compressibility, J. Geophys. Res.94, 10267–10278.Google Scholar
  60. Yale, D. P. (1984),Network Modelling of Flow, Storage and Deformation in Porous Rocks, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Calif.Google Scholar
  61. Zhang, J., Wong, T.-f., andDavis, D. M. (1990a),Micromechanics of Pressure-induced Grain Crushing in Porous Rocks, J. Geophys. Res.95, 341–352.Google Scholar
  62. Zhang, J., Wong, T.-f., andDavis, D. M.,High pressure embrittlement and shear-enhanced compaction in Berea sandstone: Acoustic emission measurement and microstructural observation. InRock Mechanics Contributions and Challenges, Proceedings of the 31st U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium (eds. Hustrulid, W. A., and Johnson, G. A.) (Balkema 1990b) pp. 653–660.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, J., Davis, D. M., andWong, T.-f. (1993),Failure modes on tuff samples from Leg 131 in the Nankai accretionary wedge. InProceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 131, 275–281.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, S., Cox, S. F., andPaterson, M. S. (1994),Porosity and Permeability Evolution during Hot Isostatic Pressing of Calcite Aggregates, J. Geophys. Res. in press.Google Scholar
  65. Zhu, W., David, C., andWong, T.-f. (1993),Permeability Reduction Induced by Pore Shrinkage and Connectivity Loss: Microstructural Observations and Percolation Modeling (Abstract), Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, EOS74, 293.Google Scholar
  66. Zoback, M. D., andByerlee, J. D. (1975),Permeability and Effective Stress, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull.59, 154–158.Google Scholar
  67. Zoback, M. D., andByerlee, J. D. (1976),Effect of High-pressure Deformation on Permeability of Ottawa Sand, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull.60, 1531–1542.Google Scholar
  68. Zoback, M. D., Zoback, M. L., Mount, V. S., Suppe, J., Eaton, J. P., Healy, J. H., Oppenheimer, D., Reasenberg, P., Jones, L., Raleigh, C. B., Wong, I. G., Scotti, O., andWentworth, C. (1987),New Evidence on the State of Stress of the San Andreas Fault System, Science238, 1105–1111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian David
    • 1
  • Teng-Fong Wong
    • 1
  • Wenlu Zhu
    • 1
  • Jiaxiang Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Space SciencesState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations