International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 459–468 | Cite as

Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: Evidence from state highways

  • Douglas Holtz-Eakin
  • Amy Ellen Schwartz
Article

Abstract

Is public-sector infrastructure a key determinant of productivity? Traditional, project-based analyses of benefits and costs typically do not find large rates of return. Proponents of infrastructure spending instead point to regressionbased analyses of the links between private productivity and public infrastructure that imply large productivity effects from public spending. The disparity in estimated returns is often attributed to geographic spillovers in productivity benefits that are not captured by disaggregated analyses.

We examine the degree to which state highways provide productivity benefits beyond the narrow confines of each state's borders. Despite the fact that state highways-especially the interstate highway system-are designed at least in part with interstate linkages in mind, we find no evidence of quantitatively important productivity spillovers.

Key words

infrastructure productivity externalities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschauer, D. (1989). “Is Public Expenditure Productive?”Journal of Monetary Economes 23 (March), 177–200.Google Scholar
  2. Case, A., J. Hines, and H.S. Rosen. (1993). “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States”Journal of Public Economics 52, 285–307.Google Scholar
  3. Cliff, A., and J. Ord. (1981).Spatial Process: Models and Applications. London: Pion Limited.Google Scholar
  4. Gramlich, E., (1990).A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Holtz-Eakin, D. (1993a). “State-Specific Estimates of State and Local Government Capital”Regional Science and Urban Economics 23(2) (April), 185–210.Google Scholar
  6. Holtz-Eakin, D. (1993b). “Comment on Alicia Munnell”Journal of Economic Perspectives (Fall), 231–234.Google Scholar
  7. Holtz-Eakin, D. (forthcoming). “Public Sector Capital and the Productivity Puzzle”Review of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. Rosen. (1988). “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data”Econometrica 56 (November), 1371–1396.Google Scholar
  9. Hulten, C., and R. Schwab. (1991). “Public Capital Formation and the Growth of Regional Manufacturing Industries”National Tax Journal (December), 121–134.Google Scholar
  10. Kelejian, H., and D. Robinson. (1993). “Spatial Correlation: The Cliff and Ord Model and a Suggested Alternative”New Directions in Spatial Econometrics.Google Scholar
  11. Munnell, A. (1990a). “Why Has Productivity Growth Declined?” Productivity and Public Investment”New England Economic Review (January/February), 3–22.Google Scholar
  12. Munnell, A. (1990b). “How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance?” In A. Munnell (ed.),Is There a Shortfall in Public Capital Investment? Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Munnell, A. (1992). “Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth”Journal of Economic Perspectives (Fall), 189–198.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Holtz-Eakin
    • 1
  • Amy Ellen Schwartz
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Policy ResearchSyracuse UniversitySyracuse
  2. 2.Wagner School of Public ServiceNew York UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations