Advertisement

Applied Intelligence

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 297–316 | Cite as

Graph-based induction as a unified learning framework

  • Kenichi Yoshida
  • Hiroshi Motoda
  • Nitin Indurkhya
Article

Abstract

We describe a graph-based induction algorithm that extracts typical patterns from colored digraphs. The method is shown to be capable of solving a variety of learning problems by mapping the different learning problems into colored digraphs. The generality and scope of this method can be attributed to the expressiveness of the colored digraph representation, which allows a number of different learning problems to be solved by a single algorithm. We demonstrate the application of our method to two seemingly different learning tasks: inductive learning of classification rules, and learning macro rules for speeding up inference. We also show that the uniform treatment of these two learning tasks enables our method to solve complex learning problems such as the construction of hierarchical knowledge bases.

Key words

Machine learning induction graph 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.S. Michalski, “A theory and methodology of inductive learning,”Artif. Intell. vol. 20, pp. 111–161, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.R. Quinlan, “Induction of decision trees,”Machine Learning vol. 1, pp. 81–106, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Ellman, “Explanation-Based Learning: A survey of programs and perspectives,”ACM Comput. Surv. vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 165–220, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Mahadevan and J. Connell, “Automatic programming of behavior-based robots using reinforcement learning,”Artif. Intell. vol. 55, pp. 311–365, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Falkenhainer and K.D. Forbus, “Compositional modeling: finding the right model for the job,”Artif. Intell. vol. 51, pp. 95–143, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z.Y. Liu and A.M. Farley, “Shifting ontological perspectives in reasoning about physical systems,” inAAAI-90, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 395–400.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Lebowitz, “Integrated learning: controlling explanation,”Cog. Sci. vol. 10, pp. 219–240, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Pazzani, M. Dyer, and M. Flowers,” The role of prior causal theories in generalization,” inAAAI-86, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, pp. 545–550.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.P. Danyluk, “The use of explanation for similarity-based learning,” inIJCAI-87, Milan, Italy, 1987, pp. 274–276.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Hirsh, “Combining empirical and analytical learning with version spaces,” inML-89, Ithaca, NY, 1989, pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.S. Rosenbloom and J. Aasman, “Knowledge level and inductive uses of chunking (EBL),” inAAAI-90, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 821–827.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. Etzioni, “STATIC: A problem-space compiler for PRODIGY,” inAAAI-91, Anaheim, CA, 1991, pp. 533–540.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.A. Vere, “Induction of relational productions in the presence of background information,” inIJCAI-77, Cambridge, MA, 1977, pp. 349–355.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.R. Anderson and P.J. Kline, “A learning system and its psychological implications,” inIJCAI-79, Tokyo, Japan, 1979, pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Levinson, “A self-organizing retrieval system for graphs,” inAAAI-84, Austin, TX, 1984, pp. 203–206.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N.S. Flann and T.G. Dietterich, “A study of explanation-based methods for inductive learning,”Machine Learning, 1989, pp. 187–226.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L.B. Holder, “Empirical substructure discovery,” inML-89, Ithaca, NY, 1989, pp. 133–136.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L.B. Holder, D.J. Cook, and H. Bunke, “Fuzzy substructure discovery,” inML-92, Aberdeen, Scotland, 1992, pp. 218–223.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T.M. Mitchell, R.M. Keller, and S.T. Kedar-Cabelli, “Explanation-based generalization: a unifying view,”Machine Learning vol. 1, pp. 47–80, 1986.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. DeJong and R. Mooney, “Explanation-based learning: an alternative view,”Machine Learning vol. 1, pp. 145–176, 1986.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.E. Korf, “Macro-operators: A weak method for learning,”Artif. Intell. vol. 25, pp. 35–77, 1985.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G.A. Iba, “A heuristic approach to the discovery of macro-operators,”Machine Learning vol. 3, pp. 285–317, 1989.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Kuipers, “Qualitative simulation,”Artif. Intell. vol. 29, pp. 289–338, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G.G. Towell, J.W. Shavlik, and M.O. Noordewier, “Refinement of approximate domain theories by knowledge-based neural networks,” inAAAI-90, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 861–866.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Efron, “The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans,” inSIAM, Bowling Green State University: Bowling Green, OH, 1982.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olshen, and C.J. Stone,Classification and Regression Trees Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software: Belmont, CA, 1984.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.M. Weiss and N. Indurkhya, “Reduced complexity rule induction,” inIJCAI-91, Sydney, Australia, 1991, pp. 678–684.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Yamada and S. Tsuji, “Selective learning of macro-operators with perfect causality,” inIJCAI-89. Detroit, MI, 1989, pp. 603–608.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Mead and L. Conway,Introduction to VLSI Systems Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. Arikawa, S. Miyano, and A. Shinohara, “Knowledge acquisition from amino acid sequences by learning algorithms,” inJKAW92, Hatoyama, Japan, 1992, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Minton, “Quantitative results concerning the utility of Explanation-Based Learning,”Artif. Intell. vol. 42, pp. 363–391, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenichi Yoshida
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Motoda
    • 2
  • Nitin Indurkhya
    • 3
  1. 1.Advanced Research LaboratoryHitachi, Ltd.Hatoyama, SaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Advanced Research LaboratoryHitachi, Ltd.Hatoyama, SaitamaJapan
  3. 3.Advanced Research LaboratoryHitachi, Ltd.Hatoyama, SaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations