Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 159–162 | Cite as

A response to “On Measuring Ethical Judgments”

  • R. Eric Reidenbach
  • Donald P. Robin
Article

Abstract

This article discusses the major criticisms posed in “On Measuring Ethical Judgments” concerning our ethics scale development work. We agree that the authors of the criticism do engage in what they accurately refer to as “armchair theorizing.” We point out the errors in their comments.

Keywords

Economic Growth Development Work Major Criticism Ethical Judgment Measuring Ethical 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Reidenbach, R. E., D. P. Robin, and L. Dawson: 1991, ‘An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected marketing Practices and Marketing Groups’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19, (Spring), 83–92.Google Scholar
  2. Skipper, R. and R. R. Hyman: 1993, ‘On Measuring Ethical Judgments’,Journal of Business Ethics 12, 535–545.Google Scholar
  3. Tansey, R., R. Brown, and M. R. Hyman: 1992, ‘Ethical Judgments About Wartime Ads Depicting Combat’,Journal of Advertising 11(3), 57–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Eric Reidenbach
    • 1
  • Donald P. Robin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations