Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 125–132 | Cite as

Ethical corporate social responsibility: A framework for managers

  • Jacquie L'Etang


Managers encounter difficulties in developing corporate social responsibility programmes. These difficulties arise from conflicting interests and priorities. Pressures may be both internal and external and corporate social responsibility programmes usually evolve from a combination of proactive and reactive policies. The first experiences of a company are likely to be reactive, in response to requests for equipment, sponsorship or charitable donations but companies soon become aware of the benefits of planned programmes. Planning implies objectives, performance criteria and evaluation, and a rational framework for decision-taking. This paper attempts to highlight problem areas for managers and to develop a pragmatic framework of analysis which will help identify and clarify corporate social responsibilities. The paper, which is written from a UK perspective discusses the contribution of stakeholder models and highlights limitations of this approach. It develops an ethical framework focused on concepts of responsibility.


Economic Growth Corporate Social Responsibility Social Responsibility Performance Criterion Problem Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R., J. Carruthers and S. Hamil: 1991,Changing Corporate Values (Kogan Page Ltd., London).Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie (eds.): 1988,Ethical Theory and Business (Third Edition) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
  3. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1991, ‘Defining, Evaluating and Managing Corporate Social Performance: the Stakeholder Management Model’,Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12, 331–358.Google Scholar
  4. De George, R. T. (ed): 1978,Ethics, Free Enterprise and Public Policy Original Essays on Moral Issues in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  5. Dickie, R. and L. S. Rouner: 1986,Corporations and the Common Good (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame).Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’,New York Times, 13 Sept.Google Scholar
  7. Glover, J.: 1970,Responsibility (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
  8. Hoffman, W. M. and J. M. Moore (eds.): 1990,Business Ethics Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality (second edition) (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York et al.).Google Scholar
  9. Iannone, A. P. (ed.): 1989,Contemporary Moral Controversies in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  10. Ibsen, H.: 1964,Ghosts and Other Plays (Penguin, Harondsworth).Google Scholar
  11. Lepenies, W. 1991, ‘Grudge Match as Marx Rules Offside’,The Higher, 4 Oct.Google Scholar
  12. L'Etang, J.: 1994,‘Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Issues Arising’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, Feb.Google Scholar
  13. Lessnoff, M.: 1986,Social Contract (MacMillan Education Ltd., Bassingstoke).Google Scholar
  14. Mill, J. S. and J. Bentham: 1987,Utilitarianism and Other Essays (Penguin Books Ltd., Harmondsworth).Google Scholar
  15. Paton, H. J.: 1948, 1986,The Moral Law Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (Huchinson, London).Google Scholar
  16. Regan, T. (ed): 1984,Just Business New Introductory Essays in Business Ethics (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  17. Robin, W. L., M. S. Pritchard and J. Ellin (eds.): 1983,Profits and Professions: Essays in Business and Professional Ethics (Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacquie L'Etang
    • 1
  1. 1.The School of ManagementUniversity of StirlingStirlingSoctland, FK9 4LA UK

Personalised recommendations