Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 103–115 | Cite as

Accountant ethics: A brief examination of neglected sociological dimensions

  • Timothy J. Fogarty


Traditional treatments of accountant ethics make implicit assumptions inconsistent with a sociological perspective. This paper identifies the ways in which accountant ethics have been approached both in literature pertaining to practice and the classroom. The boundaries of the topic, when its definitions are left tacit, systematically preclude many important features of ethics. Included in these are sociological treatments of the accounting profession as a group, extra-personal aspects of decision making, the stratification of accounting practice, and a sense of ethical action. The paper concludes with an illustration of how institutional theory has the potential to create a systematic sociological interpretation of accountant ethics.


Decision Making Economic Growth Stratification Implicit Assumption Institutional Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, A.: 1988,The System of Professions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G.: 1985, ‘A Fresh Look At Standards of Professional Conduct’,Journal of Accountancy (Sept.), 91–92.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, G. and R. Ellyson: 1986, ‘Restructuring Professional Standards: The Anderson Report’,Journal of Accountancy, 92–104.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, M.: 1987, ‘Moral Development and Accounting Education’,Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 27–42.Google Scholar
  5. Axline, L.: 1990, ‘The Bottom Line on Ethics’,Journal of Accountancy (Dec.), 87–92.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, A. and R. Tondkar: 1987, ‘Development of a Professional Code of Ethics’,Journal of Accountancy (May), 97–104.Google Scholar
  7. Blank, M.: 1985, ‘Socialization in Public Accounting Firm’, unpublished dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, D. and L. Parker: 1992, ‘SEC Communications to the Audit Profession: An Analysis of Enforcement Actions’,Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 297–330.Google Scholar
  9. Carlin, J.: 1966,Lawyers' Ethics: A Survey of the New York Bar (Russell Sage, New York).Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter, D.: 1991, ‘Ethics and the Accounting Profession-A Series of Unreliable Views?’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  11. Chua, F. and M. Mathews: 1990, ‘Professional Ethics, Public Confidence and Accounting Education’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  12. Copeland, J.: 1988, ‘Dealing with the Ethics Dilemma: A Shared Responsibility’,Georgia Journal of Accounting (Spring), 25–36.Google Scholar
  13. Covaleski, M. and M. Dirsmith: 1991, ‘The Management of Legitimacy and Power in Public Sector Administration’,Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 135–156.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, S. and J. Ketz: 1991, ‘Fraud and Accounting Research’,Accounting Horizons (Sept.), 135–156.Google Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’ (Feb.),American Sociological Review 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  16. Fogarty, T.: 1992, ‘Organizational Socialization in Accounting Firms: A Theoretical Framework and Agenda for Future Research’,Accounting, Organizations and Society, 129–150.Google Scholar
  17. Fogarty, T., J. Heian and D. Knutson: 1991, ‘The Rationality of Doing Nothing: Auditors' Responses to Legal Liability In An Institutionalized Environment’,Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 201–226.Google Scholar
  18. Fuglister, J., H. Meier and E. Obersteiner: 1991, ‘Does Assertiveness Training Improve the Ethical Behavior of Accounting Students?’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  19. Fulmer, W. and B. Cargile: 1987, ‘Ethical Perspectives of Accounting Students: Does Exposure to a Code of Professional Ethics Help?’,Issues in Accounting Education (Fall), 207–219.Google Scholar
  20. Galashiewicz, J.: 1985, ‘Professional Networks and the Institutionalization of a Single Mind Set’,American Sociological Review, 639–658.Google Scholar
  21. Graber, D.: 1979, ‘Ethics Enforcement — How Effective?’,CPA Journal (Sept.), 11–16.Google Scholar
  22. Grollman, W. and J. Van Hise: 1990, ‘Ethical Dilemmas of Management Accounting’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, J. and M. Reynolds: 1992, ‘Formal Codes: The Deliniation of Ethical Dilemmas’,Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1–17.Google Scholar
  24. Higgins, T. and W. Olson: 1972, ‘Restating the Ethics Code: A Decision for the Times’,Journal of Accountancy (March), 37–39.Google Scholar
  25. Hiltebeitel, K. and S. Jones: 1991, ‘Initial Evidence on the Impact of Integrating Ethics into Accounting Education’,Issues in Accounting Education (Fall), 262–275.Google Scholar
  26. Hoff, J.: 1989, ‘Students, Ethics and Surveys’,Journal of Business Ethics (Oct.), 823–825.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, M. and R. Schuler: 1972, ‘Attitudes and Behaviors’,Annual Review of Sociology, 1–24.Google Scholar
  28. Kamens, D.: 1977, ‘Legitimating Myths and Educational Organizations: The Relationship Between Organizational Ideology and Formal Structure’,American Sociological Review (April),42(2), 208–221.Google Scholar
  29. Kelly, L.: 1983, ‘The Value to the Individual Professional Man of Strict Adherence to His Code of Ethics’,Journal of Accountancy (Nov.), 140–142.Google Scholar
  30. Langenderfer, H. and J. Rockness: 1985, ‘Integrating Ethics into the Accounting Curriculum: Issues, Problems and Solutions’,Issues in Accounting Education (Spring), 58–69.Google Scholar
  31. Larson, M.: 1977,The Rise of Professionalism (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  32. Lasch, C.: 1978,The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  33. Lehman, C.: 1988, ‘Accounting Ethics: Survival of the Fitness’,Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 71–82.Google Scholar
  34. Loeb, S.: 1971, ‘A Survey of Ethical Behavior in the Accounting Profession’,Journal of Accounting Research, 287–306.Google Scholar
  35. Loeb, S.: 1972, ‘Enforcement of the Code of Ethics: A Survey’,The Accounting Review, 1–10.Google Scholar
  36. Loeb, S.: 1989, ‘Ethics Committees and Consultants in Public Accounting’,Accounting Horizons (Dec.), 1–10.Google Scholar
  37. Loeb, S.: 1988, ‘Teaching Students Accounting Ethics: Some Critical Issues’,Issues in Accounting Education, 316–329.Google Scholar
  38. Lowe, E.: 1987, ‘Ethics in Our 100-Year History’,Journal of Accountancy (May), 78–109.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, M.: 1992, ‘A Framework for Teaching Ethics to Accounting Students’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  40. Meyer, J.: 1978, ‘Strategies for Future Research: Varieties of Environmental Variation’, in M. Meyer (ed.),Environment and Organization (Josey Bass, San Francisco), pp. 352–368.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer, J. and B. Rowan: 1977, ‘Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’,American Journal of Sociology, 340–361.Google Scholar
  42. Meyer, J., W. Scott and D. Strang: 1987, ‘Centralization Fragmentation and School District Complexity’,Administrative Science Quarterly, 186–201.Google Scholar
  43. Mezias, S.: 1990, ‘An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200’,Administrative Science Quarterly, 431–457.Google Scholar
  44. Moran, M. and G. Previts: 1984, ‘The SEC and the Profession: 1934–1984, The Realities of Self-Regulation’,Journal of Accountancy (July), 68–83.Google Scholar
  45. Neu, D.: 1991, ‘New Stock Issues and the Institutional Production of Trust’,Accounting, Organizations and Society, 185–200.Google Scholar
  46. O'Leary, T. and R. Boland: 1987, ‘Self-Regulation, Public Interest and the Accounting Profession’,Research in Accounting Regulation, 103–121.Google Scholar
  47. Oliver, C.: 1991, ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’,Academy of Management of Review, 145–179.Google Scholar
  48. Orton, J. and K. Weick: 1990, ‘Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization’,Academy of Management Review, 203–223.Google Scholar
  49. Peters, T. and R. Waterman: 1982,In Pursuit of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Ponemon, L.: 1990, ‘Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective’,Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 191–215.Google Scholar
  51. Ponemon, L.: 1992, ‘Ethical Reasoning and Selection Socialization in Accounting’,Accounting, Organizations and Society, 239–258.Google Scholar
  52. Ponemon, L. and A. Glazer: 1990, ‘Accounting Education and Ethical Development: The Influence of Liberal Learning on Students and Alumni in Accounting Practice’,Issues in Accounting Education (Fall), 195–208.Google Scholar
  53. Powell, W: 1987, ‘Institutional Effects on Organizational Structure and Performance’, in L. Zucker (ed.),Institutional Patterns and Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge MA), pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
  54. Preston, A., D. Scarbrough and R. Chilton: 1990, ‘Transformation in the Moral Code and Ethics of the U.S. Accounting Profession, 1960–1988: A Tale of Changing Narratives of Legitimation’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  55. Rest, J.: 1986,Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).Google Scholar
  56. Ritti, R. and J. Silver: 1986, ‘Early Processes of Institutionalization: The Dramaturgy of Exchange’,Administrative Science Quarterly, 25–42.Google Scholar
  57. Robison, W.: 1990, ‘Subordinates and Moral Dilemmas’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  58. Ruland, R. and C. Lindblom: 1992, ‘Ethics and Disclosure: An Analysis of Conflicting Duties’,Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 259–272.Google Scholar
  59. Schlacter, P.: 1991, ‘Organizational Influences on Individual Ethical Behavior in Public Accounting’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  60. Scribner, E. and M. Dillaway: 1989, ‘Strengthening the Ethics Content of Accounting Courses’,Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 41–56.Google Scholar
  61. Sellers, J.: ‘An International Perspective on Professional Ethics’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  62. Shaub, M.: 1988, ‘Restructuring the Code of Ethics: A Review of the Anderson Committee Report and its Implications’,Accounting Horizon, 89–97.Google Scholar
  63. Shaub, M.: 1991, ‘Trends in the Cognitive Moral Development of Auditors and Accounting Students’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  64. Solomon, I.: 1987, ‘Multi-Auditor Judgment/Decision Making Research’,Journal of Accounting Literature, 1–25.Google Scholar
  65. Thomas, C.: 1991, ‘Are Younger Managers Less Ethical?’,New Accountant (March), 3–7, 25.Google Scholar
  66. Thomas, J.: 1985, ‘Justice as Interaction: Loose Coupling and Mediations in the Adversary Process’,Symbolic Interaction, 243–260.Google Scholar
  67. Tidrick, D.: 1990, ‘Disciplinary Actions by the AICPA Against Individual Members, 1980–1990’,Research in Accounting Regulation, 163–177.Google Scholar
  68. Trevino, L. and S. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Applies in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’,Journal of Applied Psychology, 378–385.Google Scholar
  69. Turner, J. and R. Jensen: 1987, ‘Recent Episodes in the “Oversight Cycle”, of Accounting Self-Regulation’,Research in Accounting Regulation, 35–50.Google Scholar
  70. Weick, K.: 1976, ‘Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems’,Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–19.Google Scholar
  71. Welton, R. and J. Davis: 1992, ‘Improving Professional Ethics: Can Ethical Behavior Be Changed?’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  72. Zucker, L.: 1987, ‘Where do Institutional Patterns Come From?’, inInstitutional Patterns and Organizations (L. Zucker, ed.) Ballinger, Cambridge MA, pp. 23–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy J. Fogarty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Accountancy, Weatherhead School of ManagementCase Wester Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations