Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 12, pp 949–959 | Cite as

A preliminary investigation of the relationship between selected organizational characteristics and external whistleblowing by employees

  • Tim Barnett
Article

Abstract

Whistleblowing by employees to regulatory agencies and other parties external to the organization can have serious consequences both for the whistleblower and the company involved. Research has largely focused on individual and group variables that affect individuals' decision to blow the whistle on perceived wrongdoing.

This study examined the relationship between selected organizational characteristics and the perceived level of external whistleblowing by employees in 240 organizations. Data collected in a nationwide survey of human resource executives were analyzed using analysis of variance.

Results indicated that executives of larger organizations perceived a higher level of employee-voiced concerns to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, as well as a higher overall level of external whistleblowing. Executives of organizations with union employees perceived a higher level of employee-voiced concerns to the EEOC, the media, and a higher overall level of external whistleblowing. Executives of organizations in the manufacturing industry group perceived a higher level of employee-voiced concerns to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The implications of these findings are discussed, and limitations of the research are addressed. The paper concludes with several suggestions for continued research.

Keywords

Economic Growth Human Resource Regulatory Agency Employment Opportunity Preliminary Investigation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, T. R., Cochran, D. and Taylor, G. S.: 1992, ‘The Internal Disclosure Policies of Private Sector Employers: An Initial Look at their Relationship to Employee Whistleblowing’,Journal of Business Ethics, accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  2. Brabeck, M.: 1984, ‘Ethical Characteristics of Whistleblowers’,Journal of Research in Personality 18, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
  3. Daft, R. L.: 1989,Organization Theory and Design, 3rd ed. (West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota).Google Scholar
  4. Daft, R. L. and Bradshaw, P. J.: 1980, ‘The Process of Horizontal Differentiation: Two Models’,Administrative Science Quarterly 25, pp. 441–456.Google Scholar
  5. Dandekar, N.: 1990, ‘Contrasting Consequences: Bringing Charges of Sexual Harassment Compared with other Cases of Whistleblowing’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 151–158.Google Scholar
  6. Deshpande, S. P. and Fiorito, J: 1989, ‘Specific and General Beliefs in Union Voting Models’,Academy of Management Journal 32, pp. 853–867.Google Scholar
  7. Dewar, R. and Hage, J.: 1978, ‘Size, Technology, Complexity, and Structural Differentiation: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis’,Administrative Science Quarterly 23, pp. 111–136.Google Scholar
  8. Dozier, J. B. and Miceli, M. P.: 1985, ‘Potential Predictors of Whistleblowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective’,Academy of Management Review 10, pp. 823–836.Google Scholar
  9. Dworkin, T. M. and Near, J. P.: 1987, ‘Whistleblowing Statutes: Are They Working?’,American Business Law Journal 25, pp. 241–263.Google Scholar
  10. Elliston, F. A.: 1982a, ‘Anonymity and Whistleblowing’,Journal of Business Ethics 1, pp. 167–177.Google Scholar
  11. Elliston, F. A.: 1982b, ‘Civil Disobedience and Whistleblowing: A Comparative Appraisal of Two Forms of Dissent’,Journal of Business Ethics 1, pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
  12. Ewing, D. W.: 1983,Do It My Way — Or You're Fired! (E. P. Dutton, New York).Google Scholar
  13. Farrell, D. and Petersen, J. C.: 1982, ‘Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations’,Academy of Management Review 7, pp. 561–575.Google Scholar
  14. Fiorito, J., Gallagher, D. G. and Greer, C. R.: 1986, ‘Determinants of Unionism: A Review of the Literature’, in K. M. Rowland and G. R. Ferris (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 4 (JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.), pp. 269–306.Google Scholar
  15. Geeraerts, G.: 1984, ‘The Effects of Ownership on the Organization Structure in Small Firms’,Administrative Science Quarterly 29, pp. 232–237.Google Scholar
  16. Glausser, M.: 1982, ‘Factors which Facilitate or Impede Upward Communication in Organization’, Paper presented at theNational Academy of Management Meeting, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Glazer, M. P. and Glazer, P. M.: 1989,The Whistleblowers (Basic Books Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  18. Graham, J. W.: 1986a, ‘Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press Inc.), 8, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, J. W.: 1986b, ‘The Profit of Prophecy: Organizational Response to Principled Organizational Dissent’, Unpublished working paper, Loyola University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Greenberger, D. B., Miceli, M. P. and Cohen, D. J.: 1987, ‘Oppositionists and Group Norms: The Reciprocal Influence of Whistle-blowers and Co-workers’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 527–542.Google Scholar
  21. Holley, W. H. and Jennings, K. M.: 1988,The Labor Relations Process (The Dryden Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  22. Howard, J. L.: 1988, ‘Current Developments in Whistleblower Protection’,Labor Law Journal 39, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
  23. Hsu, C. K., March, R. M. and Mannari, H.: 1983, ‘An Examination of the Determinants of Organizational Structure’,American Journal of Sociology 88, pp. 975–996.Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, J. V.: 1987, ‘Ethical Tension Points in Whistleblowing’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 321–328.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, D. A. and Pany, K. K.: 1981, ‘Expose or Cover-up: Will an Employee Blow the Whistle?’,Management Accounting 59, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
  26. Jos, P. H., Tompkins M. E. and Hays, S. W.: 1989, ‘In Praise of Difficult People: A Portrait of the Committed Whistleblower’,Public Administration Review (November/December), pp. 552–561.Google Scholar
  27. Keenan, J. P.: 1988, ‘Communication Climate, Whistleblowing, and the First-Level Manager: A Preliminary Study’, Paper presented at theSouthern Management Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  28. Keenan, J. P.: 1990, ‘Upper-Level Managers and Whistle-blowing: Determinants of Perceptions of Company Encouragement and Information about where to Blow the Whistle’,Journal of Business and Psychology 5, pp. 223–235.Google Scholar
  29. Kimberly, J. R.: 1976, ‘Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique and Proposal’,Administrative Science Quarterly 21, pp. 571–597.Google Scholar
  30. Malin, M. H.: 1983, ‘Protecting the Whistleblower from Retaliatory Discharge’,University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 16, pp. 277–318.Google Scholar
  31. Massengill, D. and Petersen, D. J.: 1989, ‘Whistleblowing: Protected Activity or Not?’,Employee Relations Law Journal 15, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
  32. Miceli, M. P. and Dozier, J. B.: 1991, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Data Fudging: A Controlled Field Experiment’,Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21, pp. 271–295.Google Scholar
  33. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P.: 1984, ‘The Relationship Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-blowing: A Discriminant Analysis’,Academy of Management Journal 27, pp. 687–705.Google Scholar
  34. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P.: 1985, ‘Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistleblowing Decisions’,Personnel Psychology 38, pp. 525–544.Google Scholar
  35. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P.: 1988, ‘Individual and Situational Correlates of Whistle-blowing’,Personnel Psychology 41, pp. 267–281.Google Scholar
  36. Miceli, M. P. and Near, J. P.: 1989, ‘The Incidence of Wrongdoing, Whistleblowing, and Retaliation: Results of a Naturally Occurring Field Experiment’,Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2, 91–108.Google Scholar
  37. Miceli, M. P., Roach, B. L. and Near, J. P.: 1988, ‘The Motivations of ‘Deep Throat’: The Case of Anonymous Whistleblowers’,Public Personnel Management 17, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
  38. Nader, R., Petkas, P. J. and Blackwell, K.: 1972,Whistle-blowing: The Report on the Conference on Professional Responsibility (Grossman, New York).Google Scholar
  39. Near, J. P. and Jensen, T. C.: 1983, ‘The Whistleblowing Process: Retaliation and Perceived Effectiveness’,Work and Occupations 10, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
  40. Near, J. P. and Miceli, M. P.: 1985, ‘Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing’,Journal of Business Ethics 4, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  41. Near, J. P. and Miceli, M. P.: 1986, ‘Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: Predictions and Effects’,Journal of Applied Psychology 71, pp. 137–145.Google Scholar
  42. Near, J. P. and Miceli, M. P.: 1987, ‘Whistleblowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers?’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior 9 (JAI Press Inc.), pp. 321–368.Google Scholar
  43. Nunnally, J. C.: 1978,Psychometric Methods, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York).Google Scholar
  44. Parliman, G. C.: 1987, ‘Protecting the Whistleblower’,Personnel Administrator 32, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  45. Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P. and Jensen, T. C.: 1982, ‘Correlates of Whistleblowers Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation’,Administrative Science Quarterly 27, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
  46. Reimann, B.: 1973, ‘On the Dimensions of Bureaucratic Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal’,Administrative Science Quarterly 18, pp. 462–476.Google Scholar
  47. Rongine, N. M.: 1985, ‘Toward a Coherent Legal Response to the Public Policy Dilemma Posed by Whistleblowing’,American Business Law Journal 23, pp. 281–297.Google Scholar
  48. Sculnick, M. W.: 1986, ‘Disciplining Whistle-blowers’,Employment Relations Today 13, pp. 189–194.Google Scholar
  49. Weinstein, D.: 1979,Bureaucratic Opposition (Pergamon Press, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Westin, A. F. (ed.): 1981,Whistle-blowing: Loyalty and Dissent in the Corporation (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Barnett
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Administration and BusinessLouisiana Tech UniversityT.S. RustonUSA

Personalised recommendations