Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 5–6, pp 461–470 | Cite as

Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies

  • Donelson R. Forsyth
Behavioral Aspects Of Business Ethics

Abstract

Individuals' moral judgments of certain business practices and their decisions to engage in those practices are influenced by their personal moral philosophies: (a) situationists advocate striving for the best consequences possible irrespective of moral maxims; (b) subjectivists reject moral guidelines and base judgments on personal values and practical concerns; (c) absolutists assume that actions are moral, provided they yield positive consequences and conform to moral rules; (d) exceptionists prefer to follow moral dictates but allow for exceptions for practical reasons. These variations, which are based on two fundamental dimensions (concern for principles and concern for promoting human welfare) influence a variety of moral processes and have implications for ethical debates over business practices.

Keywords

Economic Growth Practical Reason Moral Judgment Good Consequence Fundamental Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A.: 1990, ‘Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control’,Journal of Social Issues 46(1), pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
  2. Boyce, W. D. and Jensen, L. C.: 1978,Moral Reasoning: A Psychological—Philosophical Integration (U. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln).Google Scholar
  3. Derry, R.: 1989, ‘An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 855–862.Google Scholar
  4. Fletcher, J.: 1966,Situation Ethics (Westminster Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  5. Forsyth, D. R.: 1978,Moral Attribution and the Evaluation of Action, unpublished doctoral dissertation (University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl).Google Scholar
  6. Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar
  7. Forsyth, D. R.: 1981a, ‘A Psychological Perspective on Ethical Uncertainties in Behavioral Research’, in A. J. Kimmel (ed.),New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: Ethics of Human Subject Research, No. 10 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  8. Forsyth, D. R.: 1981b, ‘Moral Judgment: The Influence of Ethical Ideology’,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7, pp. 218–223.Google Scholar
  9. Forsyth, D. R.: 1985, ‘Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral Judgment’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, pp. 264–272.Google Scholar
  10. Forsyth, D. R.: (in press), ‘Values, Conceptions of Science, and the Social Psychological Study of Morality’, in M. Azmitia, W. M. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz (eds.),The Role of Values in Psychology and Human Development (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  11. Forsyth, D. R. and Berger, R. E.: 1982, ‘The Effects of Ethical Ideology on Moral Behavior’,Journal of Social Psychology 117, pp. 53–56.Google Scholar
  12. Forsyth, D. R. and Matney, L.: 1990, ‘The Emotional Consequences of Selfish and Selfless Actions’, paper presented at the Second Annual Convention (June 1990) of the American Psychological Society, Dallas TX.Google Scholar
  13. Forsyth, D. R. and Nye, J. L.: 1990, ‘Personal Moral Philosophies and Moral Choice’,Journal of Research in Personality 24, pp. 398–414.Google Scholar
  14. Forsyth, D. R., Nye, J. L. and Kelly, K.: 1988, ‘Idealism Relativism, and the Ethic of Caring’,Journal of Psychology 122, pp. 243–248.Google Scholar
  15. Forsyth, D. R. and Pope, W. R.: 1984, ‘Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, pp. 1365–1375.Google Scholar
  16. Freud, S.: 1927, ‘The Psychopathology of Everyday Life’ (Hogarth Press, London).Google Scholar
  17. Gilligan, C.: 1982,In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  18. Haan, N.: 1978, ‘Two Moralities in Action Context’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, pp. 286–305.Google Scholar
  19. Haan, N.: 1982, ‘Can Research on Morality be “Scientific”’,American Psychologist 37, pp. 1096–1104.Google Scholar
  20. Haan, N.: 1986, ‘Systematic Variability in the Quality of Moral Action, as Defined in Two Formulations’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, pp. 1271–1284.Google Scholar
  21. Haan, N., Aerts, E. and Copper, B: 1985,On Moral Grounds: The Search for Practical Morality (New York University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  22. Hartshorne, H. and May, M. A.: 1928,Studies in the Nature of Characten (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
  23. James, W.: 1891/1973, ‘The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life’, in P. E. Davis (ed.),Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Columbus, OH).Google Scholar
  24. Kant, I.: 1873/1973, ‘Critique of Pure Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics. T. K. Abbott (trans),’ in P. E. Davis (ed.),Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Columbus, OH).Google Scholar
  25. Kelley, M.: 1989, ‘Commentary on “An empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 863–864.Google Scholar
  26. Klass, E. T.: 1978, ‘Psychological Effects of Immoral Actions: The Experimental Evidence’,Psychological Bulletin 85, pp. 756–771.Google Scholar
  27. Kohlberg, L.: 1983,Essays in Moral Development, Vol. 2 (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  28. Kurtines, W. M.: 1984, ‘Moral Behavior as Rule Governed Behavior: A Psychosocial Role-Theoretical Approach to Moral Behavior and Development’, in W. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (eds.),Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development: Basic Issues in Theory and Research (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  29. Kurtines, W. M.: 1986, ‘Moral Behavior as Rule Governed Behavior: Person and Situation Effects on Moral Decision Making’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, pp. 784–791.Google Scholar
  30. Leary, M. R., Knight, P. D. and Barnes, B. D.: 1986, ‘Ethical Ideologies of the Machiavellian’,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12, pp. 75–80.Google Scholar
  31. Schlenker, B. R. and Forsyth, D. R.: 1977, ‘On the Ethics of Psychological Research’,Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, pp. 369–396.Google Scholar
  32. Sharp, F. C.: 1898, ‘An Objective Study of Some Moral Judgments’,American Journal of Psychology 9, pp. 198–234.Google Scholar
  33. Singh, B. and Forsyth, D. R.: 1989, ‘Sexual Attitudes and Moral Values: The Importance of Idealism and Relativism’,Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27, pp. 160–162.Google Scholar
  34. Waterman, A. S.: 1988, ‘On the Uses of Psychological Theory and Research in the Process of Ethical Inquiry’,Psychological Bulletin 103, pp. 283–298.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donelson R. Forsyth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations