Synthese

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 141–162 | Cite as

Piagetian epistemology: Equilibration and the teaching of science

  • Jack A. Rowell
Article

Abstract

That Piagetian epistemology has the dynamics of knowledge growth as its core consideration predetermines a need to consider it as potentially applicable to teaching. This paper addresses that need by first outlining the Piagetian theory of equilibration and then applying it to the construction of methods of teaching science.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausubel, D. P.: 1963,The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning, Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bohm, D.: 1974, ‘Science as Perception-Communication’, in Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  3. Brent, S. B.: 1978, ‘Prigogine's Model for Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems’,Human Development 21, 374–87.Google Scholar
  4. Cellérier, G.: 1984, ‘Of Genes and Schemes’,Human Development 27, 342–52.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, M.: 1986, ‘The Structure of Exchange: Piaget's Sociological Theory’,Human Development 29, 181–94.Google Scholar
  6. DiSessa, A. A.: 1982, ‘Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: a Study of Knowledge-Based Learning’,Cognitive Science 6, 37–75.Google Scholar
  7. Elkind, D.: 1982, ‘Piagetian Psychology and the Practice of Child Psychiatry’,Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 21, 435–45.Google Scholar
  8. Feyerabend, P.: 1965, ‘Reply to Criticism’, in Cohen and Wartofsky (eds.),Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, D. Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  9. Furth, H.: 1981,Piaget and Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Furth, H.: 1983, ‘Symbol Formation: Where Freud and Piaget Meet’,Human Development 26, 26–41.Google Scholar
  11. Gallagher, J. M. and D. K. Reid: 1978,The Learning Theory of Piaget and Inhelder, Brooks and Cole, Monterey.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, J. K., R. J. Osborne and P. J. Fensham: 1982, ‘Children's Science and Its Consequences for Teaching’,Science Education 66, 623–33.Google Scholar
  13. Haroutunian, S.: 1983,Equilibrium in the Balance. a Study of Psychological Explanation, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Inhelder, B. and J. Piaget: 1958,The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  15. Inhelder, B., H. Sinclair and M. Bovet: 1974,Learning and the Development of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Karmiloff-Smith, A. and B. Inhelder: 1975, ‘If You Want to Get Ahead, Get a Theory’,Cognition 3, 195–212.Google Scholar
  17. Kitchener, R. F.: 1981, ‘Piaget's Social Psychology’,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11, 253–77.Google Scholar
  18. Kitchener, R. F.: 1985, ‘Genetic Epistemology, History of Science and Genetic Psychology’,Synthese 65, 3–31.Google Scholar
  19. Kuhn, T.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Kakatos, I.: 1974, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programes’, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  21. Laudan, L.: 1987, ‘Relativism, Naturalism and Reticulation’,Synthese 71, 221–34.Google Scholar
  22. Laudan, L., A. Donovan, R. Laudan, P. Barker, H. Brown, J. Leplin, P. Thagard and S. Wykstra: 1986, ‘Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research’,Synthese 69, 141–223.Google Scholar
  23. Mackworth, N. H.: 1965, ‘Originality’,American Psychologist 20, 51–66.Google Scholar
  24. McCloskey, M.: 1983, ‘Intuitive Physics’,Scientific American 248, 114–22.Google Scholar
  25. Mays, W.: 1982, ‘Piaget's Sociological Theory’ in Modgil and Modgil (eds.),Jean Piaget. Consensus and Controversy, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London.Google Scholar
  26. Piaget, J.: 1950a,Introduction à l'Epistémologie Génétique, Vol. III: La Pensée Biologique, Psychologique et Sociologique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Piaget, J.: 1950b,The Psychology of Intelligence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  28. Piaget, J.: 1965,Études Sociologiques, Droz, Geneva.Google Scholar
  29. Piaget, J.: 1968a,Le Structuralisme, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J.: 1968b, ‘The Mental Development of the Child’, in Elkind (ed.),Six Psychological Studies, University of London Press, London.Google Scholar
  31. Piaget, J.: 1970,Genetic Epistemology, Columbia University Press, London.Google Scholar
  32. Piaget, J.: 1971,Insights and Illusions of Philosophy, New American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Piaget, J.: 1972, ‘Creativity’ inCreativity: Moving Force of Society, Eisenhower Symposium conducted at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. [Edited translation] in J. M. Gallagher, and D. K. Reid: 1978,The Learning Theory of Piaget and Inhelder, Brooks and Cole, Monterey.Google Scholar
  34. Piaget, J.: 1977a, ‘Phenocopy in Biology and the Psychological Development of Knowledge’, in Gruber and Voneche (eds.),The Essential Piaget, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Piaget, J.: 1977b,The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Piaget, J. and G. Voyat: 1979, “The Possible, the Impossible, and the Necessary’, in Murray (ed.),The Impact of Piagetian Theory on Education, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  37. Popper, K. R.: 1959,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  38. Popper, K. R. and J. C. Eccles: 1977,The Self and its Brain, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Prigogine, I.: 1978, ‘Time, Structure, and Fluctuation’,Science 201, 777–85.Google Scholar
  40. Prigogine, I., G. Nicolis and A. Babloyantz: 1972, ‘Thermodynamics of Evolution’,Physics Today 25, 23–28, 38–44.Google Scholar
  41. Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers: 1984,Order out of Chaos, Shambala, Boulder.Google Scholar
  42. Rowell, J. A.: 1983, ‘Equilibration: Developing the Hard Core of the Piagetian Research Program’,Human Development 26, 61–71.Google Scholar
  43. Rowell, J. A.: 1984, ‘Many Paths to Knowledge: Piaget and Science Education’,Studies in Science Education 11, 1–25.Google Scholar
  44. Rowell, J. A. and C. J. Dawson: 1983, ‘Laboratory Counter-Examples and the Growth of Understanding in Science’,European Journal of Science Education 5, 203–15.Google Scholar
  45. Rowell, J. A. and C. J. Dawson: 1985, ‘Equilibration, Conflict and Instruction: A New Class-Oriented Perspective’,European Journal of Science Education 7, 331–44.Google Scholar
  46. Sober, E.: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Rationality’,Synthese 46, 95–120.Google Scholar
  47. Toulmin, S.: 1962,The Philosophy of Science, Arrow Books, London.Google Scholar
  48. Vonèche, J.: 1984, ‘Introduction’,Human Development 27, 227–32.Google Scholar
  49. Vuyk, R.: 1981,Overview and Critique of Piaget's Genetic Epistemology, Vols. 1 and 2, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  50. Weil, M. and B. Joyce: 1978,Information Processing Models of Teaching, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  51. Welles, J. F.: 1984, ‘The Survival Advantage of Stupidity’,Speculations in Science and Technology 7, 17–21.Google Scholar
  52. Youniss, J.: 1981, ‘A Revised Interpretation of Piaget (1932)’, in Siegel, Brodzinsky and Golinkoff (eds.),New Directions in Piagetian Theory and Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack A. Rowell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationThe University of AdelaideAdelaide

Personalised recommendations