, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 121–140 | Cite as

Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching

  • Ernst von Glasersfeld


The existence of objective knowledge and the possibility of communicating it by means of language have traditionally been taken for granted by educators. Recent developments in the philosophy of science and the historical study of scientific accomplishments have deprived these presuppositions of their former plausibility. Sooner or later, this must have an effect on the teaching of science. In this paper I am presenting a brief outline of an alternative theory of knowing that takes into account the thinking organism's cognitive isolation from ‘reality’. This orientation was proposed by Vico at the beginning of the 18th century, disregarded for two hundred years, and then propounded independently by Piaget as a developmentally grounded constructivist epistemology. The paper focuses specifically on the adaptive function of cognition, Piaget's scheme theory, the process of communication, and the subjective perspective on social interaction. In the concluding section it then suggests some of the consequences the shift of epistemological presuppositions might have for the practice of teaching.


18th Century Social Interaction Scheme Theory Alternative Theory Historical Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous: 1711, ‘Osservazioni’,Giornale de' Letterati d'Italia, Venice5, article VI.Google Scholar
  2. Beth, E. W. and J. Piaget: 1961,Epistémologie Mathématique et Psychologie, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Ceccato, S.: 1974, ‘In the Garden of Choices’, in C. D. Smock and E. v. Glasersfeld (eds.),Epistemology and Education, Follow Through Publications, Report 14, Athens, Georgia, pp. 123–40, Italian original presented atConvegno sull'educazione, San Marino, Italy, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Cherry, C.: 1966,On Human Communication, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Clement, J.: 1987, ‘Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Physics: The Role of Anchoring Intuitions and Analogical Validity’, in J. Novak (ed.),Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Vol. 3, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, pp. 84–97.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, P., T. Wood and E. Yackel: 1989, ‘Philosophy of Science as a Source of Analogies for Mathematics Education’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  7. Confrey, J.: 1984, ‘An Examination of the Conceptions of Mathematics of Young Women in High School’, paper presented at Annual Meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Duckworth, E.: 1987,The Having of Wonderful Ideas, Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fleck, L.: 1929, ‘Zur Krise der “Wirklichkeit”’,Die Naturwissenschaften, 17,23, 425–30. (The excerpts from this paper were translated by E. v. Glasersfeld.)Google Scholar
  10. Fleck, L.: 1935,Entstehung und Entwiklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache, Benno Schwabe, Basel, Switzerland; reprinted; Suhrkamp 1980, Nördlingen, Germany.Google Scholar
  11. Foerster, H. von: 1981,Observing Systems, Intersystems Publications, Salinas, California.Google Scholar
  12. Glasersfeld, E. von: 1982, ‘An Interpretation of Piaget's Constructivism’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie 36, 612–35.Google Scholar
  13. Glasersfeld, E. von: 1985a, ‘Reconstructing the Concept of Knowledge’,Archives de Psychologie 53, 91–101.Google Scholar
  14. Glasersfeld, E. von: 1985b, ‘Representation and Deducation’, in L. Streefland (ed.),Proceedings of the 9th Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1, State University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 484–89.Google Scholar
  15. Glasersfeld, E. von: 1986, ‘Steps in the Construction of “Others” and “Reality”’, in R. Trappl (ed.),Power, Autonomy, Utopia, Plenum, London, pp. 107–16.Google Scholar
  16. Hebb, D. O.: 1958, ‘Alice in Wonderland or Psychology among the Biological Sciences’, in Harlow and Woolsey (eds.),Biological and Biochemical Bases of Behavior, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 451–67.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, I.: 1781,Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Gesammelte Schriften, Band IV, Königlich, Preussische Akademie, Berlin, pp. 1910ff.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, first published 1962.Google Scholar
  19. Lochhead, J.: 1983, ‘Constructivist Approaches to Teaching Mathematics and Science at the College Level’, in J. Bergeron and N. Herscovics (eds.),Proceedings of 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2. PME-NA, Montreal, Canada, pp. 74–80.Google Scholar
  20. Maturana, H. R.: 1980, ‘Biology of Cognition’, in H. R. Maturana and F. J. Varela (eds.),Autopoiesis and Cognition, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 5–58.Google Scholar
  21. Nash, J.: 1970,Developmental Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  22. Piaget, J.: 1937,La construction du réel chez l'enfant, Delachaux et Niestlé, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  23. Piaget, J.: 1967a,Biologie et connaissance, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. Piaget, J.: 1967b,Six Psychological Studies, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Piaget, J. and R. Garcia: 1983,Psychogénèse et histoire des sciences, Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
  26. Pittendrigh, C. S.: 1958, ‘Adaptation, Natural Selection, and Behavior’, in A. Roe and G. G. Simpson (eds.),Behavior and Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 390–416.Google Scholar
  27. Shannon, C.: 1948, ‘The Mathematical Theory of Communication’,Bell Systems Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–56.Google Scholar
  28. Siegel, H.: 1982, ‘On the Parallel between Piagetian Cognitive Development and the History of Science’,Philosophy of Social Science 12, 375–86.Google Scholar
  29. Steffe, L. P.: 1986, ‘Principles of Mathematical Curriculum Design in Early Childhood Education’, Symposium on Early Mathematics Learning: Teacher-focused Curriculum Change,American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Steffe, L. P. and P. Cobb: 1987,Construction of Arithmetical Meanings and Strategies, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Thorndike, E.: 1966,Human Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, first published, 1931.Google Scholar
  32. Treffers, A.: 1987,Three Dimensions: A Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Education — The Wiskobas Project, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  33. Vico, G.: 1710,De antiquissima Italorum sapientia, with Italian translation by F. S. Pomodoro, Stamperia de' Classici Latini, Naples, 1858.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernst von Glasersfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Scientific Reasoning Research InstituteUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations