, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 9–41

The rationality of science, critical thinking, and science education

  • Harvey Siegel


This paper considers two philosophical problems and their relation to science education. The first involves the rationality of science; it is argued here that the traditional view, according to which science is rational because of its adherence to (a non-standard conception of) scientific method, successfully answers one central question concerning science's rationality. The second involves the aims of education; here it is argued that a fundamental educational aim is the fostering of rationality, or its educational cognate, critical thinking. The ramifications of these two philosophical theses for science education are then considered, and a science education which takes reasons in science as its fundamental feature is sketched.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Binkley, R. W.: 1980, ‘Can the Ability to Reason Well Be Thought?’, in J. A. Blair and R. Johnson (eds.),Informal Logic: The First International Symposium, Edgepress, Inverness, California, pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
  2. Dewey, J.: 1916,Democracy and Education, The Free Press, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ennis, R. H.: 1979, ‘Research in Philosophy of Science Bearing on Science Education’, in P. D. Asquith and H. E. Kyburg, Jr. (eds.),Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 138–70.Google Scholar
  4. Green, T. F.: 1972, ‘Indoctrination and Beliefs’, in I. A. Snook (ed.),Concepts of Indoctrination, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar
  5. Hempel, C.: 1979, ‘Scientific Rationality: Analytic vs. Pragmatic Perspectives’, in T. G. Geraets (ed.), pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
  6. Holton, G.: 1975, ‘Science, Science Teaching, and Rationality’, in S. Hook, P. Kurtz and M. Todorovich (eds.),The Philosophy of the Curriculum, Prometheus Books, New York, pp. 101–18.Google Scholar
  7. Kitcher, P.: 1985, ‘Good Science, Bad Science, Dreadful Science, and Pseudoscience’,Journal of College Science Teaching 14, 168–73.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhn, T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enlarged, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, M.: 1972,Concepts of Science Education, Scott Foresman, Glenview, Illinois.Google Scholar
  10. Moshman, D.: 1985, ‘A Role for Creationism in Science Education’,Journal of College Science Teaching 15, 106–09.Google Scholar
  11. Nagel, E.: 1975, ‘In Defense of Scientific Knowledge’, in S. Hook, P. Kurtz and M. Todorovich (eds.),The Philosophy of the Curriculum, Prometheus Books, New York, pp. 119–26.Google Scholar
  12. Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1981,The Rationality of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  13. Passmore, J.: 1967, ‘On Teaching To Be Critical’, in R. S. Peters (ed.),The Concept of Education, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 192–211.Google Scholar
  14. Paul, R.: 1984, ‘Critical Thinking: Fundamental to Education for a Free Society’,Educational Leadership, pp. 4–14.Google Scholar
  15. Peters, R. S.: 1966, ‘Reason and Habit: The Paradox of Moral Education’, in I. Scheffler (ed.),Philosophy and Education, 2nd ed., Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 245–62.Google Scholar
  16. Peters, R. S.: 1973,Reason and Compassion, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  17. Phillips, D. C.: 1985, ‘Can Scientific Method Be Taught?’,Journal of College Science Teaching 15, 95–101.Google Scholar
  18. Popper, K. R.: 1962,The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, K. R.: 1970, ‘Normal Science and Its Dangers’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, H.: 1981,Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Robertson, E. E.: 1984, ‘Practical Reasons, Authority, and Education’, in R. Roemer (ed.),Philosophy of Education 1983: Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society, Philosophy of Education Society, Normal, Illinois, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
  22. Russell, B.: 1945,A History of Western Philosophy, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Scheffler, I.: 1960,The Language of Education, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  24. Scheffler, I.: 1965,Conditions of Knowledge, Scott Foresman, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  25. Scheffler, I.: 1973,Reason and Teaching, Bobbs-Merrill, New York, first published in 1973 by Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  26. Scheffler, I.: 1973a, ‘Philosophical Models of Teaching’, in I. Scheffler,Reason and Reaching, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
  27. Scheffler, I.: 1973b, ‘Philosophies of and the Curriculum’, in J. F. Doyle (ed.),Educational Judgments, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  28. Scheffler, I.: 1974,Four Pragmatists, Humanities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Scheffler, I.: 1982, ‘In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions’, reprinted as Appendix B in I. Scheffler,Science and Subjectivity, 2nd ed., enlarged, Hackett, Indianopolis, Indiana, pp. 139–57; originally published inTeachers College Record 79, 171–86.Google Scholar
  30. Schwab, J. J.: 1962,The Teaching of Science as Enquiry, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  31. Scriven, M.: 1975, ‘Cognitive Moral Education’,Phi Delta Kappan 57, 689–94.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel, H.: 1980, ‘Discovery, Justification and the Naturalizing of Epistemology’,Philosophy of Science 47, 297–321.Google Scholar
  33. Siegel, H.: 1980a, ‘Objectivity, Rationality, Incommensurability, and More’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31, 359–75.Google Scholar
  34. Siegel, H.: 1981, ‘Creationism, Evolution, and Education: The California Fiasco’,Phi Delta Kappan 63, 95–101.Google Scholar
  35. Siegel, H.: 1983, ‘Truth, Problem Solving and the Rationality of Science’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14, 89–112.Google Scholar
  36. Siegel, H.: 1984, ‘Goodmanian Relativism’,The Monist 67, 359–375.Google Scholar
  37. Siegel, H.: 1984a, ‘The Response to Creationism’,Educational Studies 15, 349–64.Google Scholar
  38. Siegel, H.: 1985, ‘What Is the Question Concerning the Rationality of Science?’,Philosophy of Science 52, 517–37.Google Scholar
  39. Siegel, H.: 1987,Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism, Synthese Library, Vol. 189, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  40. Siegel, H.: 1988,Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education, Philosophy of Education Research Library, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  41. Siegel, H.: 1989a, ‘Epistemology, Critical Thinking, and Critical Thinking Pedagogy’,Argumentation 3, 127–140.Google Scholar
  42. Siegel, H.: 1989b, ‘Reasoning, Teaching, and Dostoyevsky'sThe Brothers Karamazov’, in P. W. Jackson and S. Haroutunian-Gordon (eds.),From Socrates to Software: The Teacher as Text and the Text as Teacher, Eighty-Eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, pp. 115–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey Siegel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations