Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 393–472 | Cite as

Data and phenomena

  • Jim Woodward
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ackermann, R.: 1985,Data, Instruments, and Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.: 1980,Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, W. H. Freeman, San Franscisco.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, H.: 1983, ‘The Research Process’, in H. Asher, H. Weisberg, J. Kessel and P. Shively (eds.),Theory-Building and Data Analysis in the Social Sciences, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  4. Bogen, J. and J. Woodward: ‘Saving the Phenomena’,The Philosophical Review 97, 303–52.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  6. Cline, D., A. Mann and C. Rubbia: 1974, ‘The Detection of Neutral Weak Currents’,Scientific American 231, 108–19.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, H.: 1974, ‘The Seven Sexes: A Study in the Sociology of Phenomenon, or the Replication of Experiments in Physics’,Sociology 9, 205–24.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, H.: 1981, ‘Son of Seven Sexes: The Social Destruction of a Physical Phenomenon’,Social Studies of Sciences 11, 33–62.Google Scholar
  9. Converse, P.: 1970, ‘Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue’, in E. Tufte (ed.),The Qualtitative Analyses of Social Problems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, T. and D. Campbell: 1979,Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, R. T., C. G. McIlwain and B. Kurrelmeyer: 1928, ‘Apparent Evidence of Polarization in Beams of B-Rays’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)14, 544–49.Google Scholar
  12. Crease, R. and C. Mann: 1986,The Second Creation, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  13. D'Andrade, R.: 1986, ‘Three Scientific World Views’ in D. Fiske and R. Shroeder (eds.),Methatheory in Social Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, P.: 1980,The Search for Gravity Waves, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  15. Dickerson, R. E. and I. Geis: 1983,Hemoglobin: Structure, Function, Evolution and Pathology, Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
  16. Earman, J. and C. Glymour: 1980, ‘The Gravitational Red Shift as a Test of General Relativity’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 11, 175–214.Google Scholar
  17. Feynman, R.: 1985,Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman, W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Franklin, A.: 1986,The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  19. Friedman, M.: 1974, ‘Explanation and Scientific Understanding’,Journal of Philosophy 71, 5–19.Google Scholar
  20. Galison, P.: 1982, ‘Theoretical Predispositions in Experimental Physics: Einstein and the Gyromagnetic Experiments, 1915–1925’,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 12, No. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 285–324.Google Scholar
  21. Galison, P.: 1983, ‘How the First Neutral-Current Experiments Ended’,Reviews of Modern Physics 55, 477–509.Google Scholar
  22. Galison, P.: 1985, ‘Bubble Chambers and the Experimental Work Place’, in P. Achinstein and O. Hannoway (eds.),Observation, Experiment and Hypotheses in Modern Physical Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  23. Glymour, C.: 1984, ‘Explanation and Realism’, in J. Leplin (ed.),Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1970.Google Scholar
  24. Hacking, I.: 1983,Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  25. Hacking, I.: 1981, ‘Do We See Through a Microscope?’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62, 305–22.Google Scholar
  26. Hanson, N.: 1958,Pattcrns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  27. Heilbron, J.: 1982,Elements of Early Modern Physics, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  28. Holton, G.: 1978, ‘Subelectrons, Presuppositions and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute’, reprinted in,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 9, 166–224.Google Scholar
  29. Holton, G.: 1978,The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 25–83, (page references are to reprinted version).Google Scholar
  30. Hughes, I.: 1985,Elementary Particles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  31. Kitcher, P.: 1982, ‘Explanatory Unification’,Philosophy of Science 48, 507–31.Google Scholar
  32. Klayman, J. and Y. Ha: 1987, ‘Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Information in Hypothesis-Testing’,Psychological Review 94, 211–28.Google Scholar
  33. Klotz, I.: 1980, ‘The N-Ray Affair’,Scientific American 242, 168–80.Google Scholar
  34. Kuhn, T.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Kragh, H.: 1981, ‘The Concept of the Monopole: A Historical and Analytical Case-Study’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12, 141–72.Google Scholar
  36. Laymon, R.: 1985, ‘Idealizations and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation’ in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds.),Observation, Theory, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  37. Losecco, J. M., Reines, R. and Sinclair, D.: 1985, ‘The Search for Proton Decay’,Scientific American 252, 54–62.Google Scholar
  38. Marr, D.: 1982,Vision, W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Mayo, D.: 1986, ‘Cartwright, Causality and Coincidence’, in A. Fine and P. Machaner (eds.),PSA 1986, Edward Brothers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  40. Myratt, D., M. Doherty and R. Tweney: 1977, ‘Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29, 85–95.Google Scholar
  41. Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Pagels, H.: 1985,Perfect Symmetry, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Pais, A.: 1986,Inward Bound, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  44. Perrin, J.: 1923,Atoms, trans. by D. C. Hammick, Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Pickering, A.: 1981a, ‘Constraints on Controversy: The Case of the Magnetic Monopole’,Social Studies of Science 11 63–93.Google Scholar
  46. Pickering, A.: 1981b, ‘The Hunting of the Quark’,Isis 72, 216–36.Google Scholar
  47. Pickering, A.: 1984, ‘Against Putting the Phenomena First: The Discovery of the Weak Neutral Current’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 15, 85–117.Google Scholar
  48. Pickering, A.: 1984,Constructing Quarks, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  49. Pinch, J.: 1986,Confronting Nature, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenberg, A.: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  51. Schaffner, K.: 1969, ‘Correspondence Rules’,Philosophy of Science 36, 280–90.Google Scholar
  52. Stuewer, R.: 1985, ‘Artificial Disintegration and the Cambridge-Vienna Controversy’, in P. Achinstein and O. Hannoway (eds.),Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  53. Suppe, F.: 1977, ‘The Search for Philosophical Understanding of Scientific Theories’, in F. Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
  54. Taubes, G.: 1986,Nobel Dreams, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Thagard, P.: 1978, ‘The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory-Choice’,Journal of Philosophy 75, 76–92.Google Scholar
  56. Travis, G.: 1981, ‘Replicating Replication? Aspects of the Social Construction of Learning in Planarian Worms’,Social Studies of Science 11, 11–32.Google Scholar
  57. van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  58. Watkins, P.: 1986,Story of the W and Z, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  59. Weinberg, S.: 1974, ‘Unified Theories of Elementary Particle Interaction’,Scientific American 231, 50–59.Google Scholar
  60. Will, C.: 1986,Was Einstein Right?, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, J.: 1986, Review of Robert Ackermann,Data, Instruments, and Theory, Philosophy of Science 53, 455–58.Google Scholar
  62. Woodward, J.: forthcoming, ‘The Causal Mechanical Model of Explanation’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds.),Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, volume 13.Google Scholar
  63. Ziman, J.: 1978,Reliable Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Woodward
    • 1
  1. 1.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations