Type A behavior and marital interaction: Hostile-dominant responses during conflict
- 65 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
Previous research has indicated that the risk conferred by men's Type A versus B behavior depends, in part, on the personality characteristics of their spouses. In the present study of 60 married couples, we found that couples consisting of two Structured Interview-defined Type A's showed a larger increase in hostile/dominant behavior during discussions of marital conflicts than did couples consisting of two Type B's or a Type A husband and a Type B wife. Couples consisting of a Type B husband and a Type A wife displayed an intermediate level of hostile dominance. These results are consistent with previous speculations about interpersonal dynamics in Type A behavior and interaction patterns which might underlie spouse effects on Type A behavior and coronary risk.
Key words
Type A behavior marital interaction marital satisfactionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Alexander, J. F. (1970). A systems approach to family interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angles, April.Google Scholar
- Bernhardson, C. S. (1975). Type I error rates when multiple comparison procedures follow a significantF test.Biometrics 31: 229–232.Google Scholar
- Blaney, N. T., Brown, P., and Blaney, P. H. (1986). Type A, marital adjustment, and life stress.J. Behav. Med. 9: 491–502.Google Scholar
- Brown, P., and Smith, T. W. (in press). Social influence, marriage, and the heart: Cardiovascular consequences of interpersonal control in husbands and wives.Health Psychol. Google Scholar
- Burke, R. J. (1982). Type A behavior of administrators and spouses' reports of marital satisfaction and well-being: Only a partial replication.Psychol. Rep. 50: 315–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burke, R. J., Weir, T., and DuWors, R. E., r. (1979). Type A behavior of administrators and wives' reports of marital satisfaction and well-being.J. Appl. Psychol. 64: 57–65.Google Scholar
- Carmelli, D., Swan, G. F., and Rosenman, R. H. (1985). The relationship between wives' social and psychological status and their husbands' coronary heart disease.Am. J. Epidemol. 122: 90–100.Google Scholar
- Chesney, M. A., Black, G. W., Chadwick, J. H., and Rosenman, R. H. (1981). Psychological correlates of the Type A behavior pattern.J. Behav. Med. 4: 217–229.Google Scholar
- Dembroski, T. M. (1978). Reliability and validity of methods used to assess coronary-prone behavior. In Dembroski, T. M., Weiss, S. M., Shields, J. L., Haynes, S. G., and Feinleib, M. (eds.),Coronary-Prone Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
- Eaker, E. D., Haynes, S. G., and Feinleib, M. (1983). Spouse behavior and coronary heart disease in men: Prospective results form the Framingham Heart Study. II. Modification of risk in Type A husbands according to the social and psychological status of their wives.Am. J. Epidemol. 118: 23–41.Google Scholar
- Ewart, C. K., Taylor, C. B., Kraemer, H. C., and Agras, W. S. (1984). Reducing blood pressure reactivity during interpersonal conflict: Effect of marital communication training.Behav. Ther. 15: 473–484.Google Scholar
- Fincham, F. D. (1985). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 2. Responsibility for marital problems.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 94: 183–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glass, D. C. (1977).Behavior Patterns, Stress, & Coronary Disease, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
- Gottman, J. M. (1979).Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Houston, B. K. (1988). Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine reactivity, global Type A, and components of Type A behavior. In Houston, B. K., and Snyder, C. R. (eds.),Type A Behavior Pattern: Research Theory, and Intervention, Wiley, New York, pp. 212–253.Google Scholar
- Houston, B. K., and Kelly, K. E. (1987). Type A behavior in housewives: Relation to work, marital adjustment, stress, tension, health, fear-of-failure, and self-esteem.J. Psychosom. Res. 31: 55–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, K. E., and Houston, B. K. (1985). Type A behavior in employed women: Relation to work, marital, and leisure variables, social support, stress, tension, and health.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48: 1067–1079.Google Scholar
- Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental Design Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, Brooks/Core, Moneterey, CA.Google Scholar
- Krantz, D. S., Contrada, R. J., Hill, R. D., and Friedler, D. (1988). Environmental stress and biobehavioral antecedents of coronary heart disease.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 333–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leary, T. (1957).Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality, Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Locke, H. J., and Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity.Marr. Fam. Living 21: 251–255.Google Scholar
- Matthews, K. A. (1988). CHD and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman quantitative review.Psychol. Bull. 104: 373–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medalie, J. H., Snyder, M., Groen, J. J., Neufeld, H. N., Goldbourt, U., and Riss, E. (1973). Angina pectoris among 10,000 men: 5 year incidence and univariate analysis.Am. J. Med. 55: 583–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Price, V. A. (1982).The Type A Behavior pattern: A Model for Research and Practice, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Ragland, D. R., and Brand, R. J. (1988). Type A behavior and mortality from coronary heart disease.N. Engl. J. Med. 318: 65–69.Google Scholar
- Rosenberger, L. M., and Strube, M. J. (1986). The influence of Type A and B behavior patterns on the perceived quality of dating relationships.J. Appl. Soc. psychol. 16: 277–286.Google Scholar
- Rosenman, R. H. (1978). The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In Dembroski, T. M., Weiss, S. M., Shields, J. L., Haynes, S. G., and Feinleib, M. (eds.),Coronary-Prone Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
- Rosenman, R. H., Brand, R. J., Jenkins, C. D., Friedman, M., Straus, R., and Wurm, M. (1975). Coronary heart disease in the Western Collaborative Group Study: Final follow-up experience of 8 1/2 years.JAMA 233: 872–877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith, T. W. (1989). Interactions, transactions, and the type A pattern: Additional avenues in the search for coronary-prone behavior. In Siegman, A. W., and Dembroski, T. M. (eds.),In Search of Coronary-Prone Behavior: Beyond Type A, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., and Sanders, J. D. (1986). Type A behavior, marriage, and the heart: Person-by-situation interactions and the risk of coronary disease.Beh. Med. Abstr. 7: 59–62.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., O'Keeffe, J. L., and Allred, K. D. (1989). Neuroticism, symptom reports, and Type A behavior: Interpretive cautions for the Framingham Scale.J. Behav. Med. 12, 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strube, J. J., Turner, C. W., Cerro, D., Stevens, J., and Hinchey, F. (1984). Interpersonal aggression and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern: A theoretical distinction and practical implications.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 47: 839–847.Google Scholar
- Sullaway, M. E., and Morell, M. A. (1990). Marital relationships and Type A-B behavior assessed using the Structured Interview, Jenkins Activity Survey, and Framingham Type A Scale,J. Behav. Med. 13: 419–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suls, J., and Wan, C. K. (1989). The relationship between Type A behavior and chronic emotional distress A meta-analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 57: 503–512.Google Scholar
- Thoresen, C. E., Telch, M., and Eagleston, J. (1981). Approaches to altering the Type A behavior pattern.Psychosomatics 22: 472–482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- Yarnold, P. R., Grimm, L. G., and Lyons, J. S. (1987). The Wiggins Interpersonal Behavior Circle and the Type A behavior pattern.J. Res. Personal. 21: 185–196.Google Scholar