Catalysis Letters

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 19–31

Microstructure of the activated industrial ammonia synthesis catalyst

  • W. Mahdi
  • J. Schütze
  • G. Weinberg
  • R. Schoonmaker
  • R. Schlögl
  • G. Ertl
Article

Abstract

Industrial doubly-promoted iron catalysts and model systems of singly-promoted K- and Al-iron catalysts were characterised by their catalytic performance at 1 bar pressure. The relevance of bulk nitrogen for catalytic performance is shown. The catalysts were also activated in an in-situ reaction chamber of a He-ion scattering spectrometer (ISS) and their top atomic layer elemental composition was determined after they had reached similar performance as in the microreactor tests. The bulk microstructure of these samples was investigated by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and microdiffraction.

All evidence indicates that small highly crystalline α-Fe platelets act as active phase. Their surfaces are covered to a large extent by promotor compounds which are partly present as poorly crystalline aggregates with iron oxide leaving only a small fraction of elemental iron directly exposed to the gas phase. The intimate contact between iron crystals and promoters particles prevents recrystallisation and is the key to the understanding of the structural stability of the catalyst system.

Keywords

Ammonia synthesis iron catalyst surface characterization promoter effects nitrides ion scattering spectroscopy XPS HRTEM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Schlögl, R.C. Schoonmaker, M. Muhler and G. Ertl, Catal. Lett. 1 (1988) 237.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Stoltze, Physica Scripta 36 (1987) 824.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    H.D. Vandervell and K.C. Waugh, Chem. Phys. Lett. 171 (1990) 426.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Ertl, J. Vac. Sci. A1 (1983) 1247.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Schlögl, in:Science and Technology of Ammonia Synthesis, ed. J.R. Jennings (Plenum, 1991) in press.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.C. Silverman and M. Boudart, J. Catal. 77 (1982) 208.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Rayment, R. Schlögl, J.M. Thomas and G. Ertl, Nature 315 (1985) 311.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Baiker, R. Schlögl, F. Armbruster and H.J. Güntherodt, J. Catal. 107 (1987) 221.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Baranski, A. Reizer, A. Kotarba and E. Pyrczak, Appl. Catal. 19 (1985) 417.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Ertl, M. Huber and M. Thiele, Z. Naturforsch. 34a (1979) 30.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Grunze, M. Golze, J. Fuhler, M. Neumann and E. Schwartz, Proc. 8th ICC, Vol. 4 (1985) 133.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Ertl, D. Prigge, R. Schlögl and M. Weiss, J. Catal. 79 (1983) 359.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    D.R. Strongin, S.R. Bare and G.A. Somorjai, J. Catal. 103 (1987) 289.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Nielsen,An Investigation on Promoted Iron Catalysts for the Synthesis of Ammonia, 3rd ed. (Gjellerup, 1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer A.G. Scientific Publishing Company 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Mahdi
    • 1
  • J. Schütze
    • 1
  • G. Weinberg
    • 1
  • R. Schoonmaker
    • 1
  • R. Schlögl
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Ertl
    • 1
  1. 1.Fritz Haber Institut der Max-Planck GesellschaftBerlin 33Germany
  2. 2.Institut für Anorganische Chemie der Universität Niederurseler HangFrankfurt 50Germany

Personalised recommendations