Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 70, Issue 8, pp 489–498 | Cite as

Multiple outlier detection by evaluating redundancy contributions of observations

  • X. Ding
  • R. Coleman
Article

Abstract

When applying single outlier detection techniques, such as the Tau (τ) test, to examine the residuals of observations for outliers, the number of detected observations in any iteration of adjustment is most often more numerous than the actual number of true outliers. A new technique is proposed which estimates the number of outliers in a network by evaluating the redundancy contributions of the detected observations. In this way, a number of potential outliers can be identified and eliminated in each iteration of an adjustment. This leads to higher efficiency in data snooping of geodetic networks. The technique is illustrated with some numerical examples.

Keywords

Actual Number Detection Technique Outlier Detection Geodetic Network Potential Outlier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caspary WF (1987) Concepts of Network and Deformation Analysis. Monograph 11, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  2. Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (1986) Influential observation, high leverage points, and outliers in linear regression.Statistical Science, 1(3): 379–416.Google Scholar
  3. Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (1988) Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Chen YQ, Kavouras M, Chrzanowski A (1987) A strategy for detection of outlying observations in measurements of high precision.Canadian Surveyor 41(4): 529–540.Google Scholar
  5. Cross PA, Price DR (1984) A strategy for the detection of single and multiple gross errors in geodetic networks. Eighth United Kingdom Geophysical Assembly. Newcastle Upon Tyne, April.Google Scholar
  6. Ding X (1992) Precise Engineering Surveying: Applications to the Measurement of Large Scale Steel Silos. School of Civil and Mining Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. Ding X, Coleman R (1995) Sensitivity analysis in Gauss-Markov models.Bull. Géod. (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Harvey BR, Coleman R (1993) Surveying the deflection of an arch bridge to sub-millimetre precision.Aust. Surv., 38(1): 4–14.Google Scholar
  9. Hoaglin DC, Welsch RE (1978) The hat matrix in regression and ANOVA.Amer. Statistician, 32: 17–32.Google Scholar
  10. Kok JJ (1984) On Data Snooping and Multiple Outlier Testing. NOAA Technical Report NOS NGS 30, National Geodetic Information Center, NOS/NOAA, Rockville, Md.Google Scholar
  11. Kubik K, Weng W, Frederiksen P (1985) Oh, Grosserrors!.Aust. J. Geod. Photo. Surv., 42: 1–18.Google Scholar
  12. Pope AJ (1976) The Statistics of Residuals and the Detection of Outliers. NOAA Technical Report, NOS65 NGS1, National Geodetic Information Center, NOS/NOAA, Rockville, Md.Google Scholar
  13. Xu PL (1989) On robust estimation with correlated observations,Bull. Geod., 63(3): 238–252.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. Ding
    • 1
  • R. Coleman
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Surveying and Land InformationCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia
  2. 2.School of Surveying and Spatial ScienceUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations